Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >
> > > > You're correct that this kind of code is appropriate (because the
> > > component
> > > > has already been started without the thread).
> > >
> > > Really ? The threadStart() call is in the start() method, and
> threadStop()
> > > is alw
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > > You're correct that this kind of code is appropriate (because the
> > component
> > > has already been started without the thread).
> >
> > Really ? The threadStart() call is in the start() method, and
threadStop()
> > is always called in stop(). How would the threa
