> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 9. lipanj 2002 20:20
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] RegisterNatives
>
>
> > that out. The
> > apr_initialize for IIS should be call
> De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: 9 de junio de 2002 10:39
> There is one potential problem about portability
> (apr_initialize call in
> native initialize),
> cause there is no need to call that from apache so I ifdef
> that out. The
> apr_initialize for IIS should be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 9. lipanj 2002 18:04
> To: Mladen Turk
> Cc: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] RegisterNatives
>
>
> Few questions:
>
> - Do we still need Sy
we compute for standalone mode )
Costin
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 8. lipanj 2002 22:38
> > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [PROP
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 8. lipanj 2002 22:38
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] RegisterNatives
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > Are there any reason why
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Are there any reason why are we loading jkjni, or mod_jk2 for inprocess
> mode.
> I think that the same can be accomplished using JNI RegisterNatives.
> Further more you can build the mod_jk as static module then.
> It would IMO require and some minor java
Hi,
Are there any reason why are we loading jkjni, or mod_jk2 for inprocess
mode.
I think that the same can be accomplished using JNI RegisterNatives.
Further more you can build the mod_jk as static module then.
It would IMO require and some minor java refactoring just to know when
to load the jk
