> That's more feasible, but it also has a different set of issues:
>
> * Configuring the current generation of web connectors causes 90% of the
> user gripes about Tomcat. Anyone who needs evidence should subscribe
> to TOMCAT-USER and start answering all the questions about configuring.
We
>
> - Performance tuning for Java2 JVMs (particularly HotSpot) focuses
> your attention on different areas than JDK 1.1. Trying to optimize
> for both increases the effort required, and could lead to conflicts
> where you want to do things differently on different platforms.
Well,
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> * Dependence on Java2 as a base platform. This is not just an issue
> of using the collections classes (although that's part of it). Consider
> a few other issues:
Once again - there is no problem with using Java2 for tomcat modules in
3.x.
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> There seems to be consensus growing around these three names. Does that
> meet with everyone's agreement? If so, I can create the new repositories
> and set up the permissions stuff later today.
+1
( Regarding the name for the third:
+0.7 fo
On Mon, 7 May 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> [snip]
> In TC 4.0, I think about the excellent works from Bip Thelin
> (TC 4.x Clustering). What make it specific to TC 4.x ?
>
Here lies the crux of the difficulties in sharing significant code
(beyond the kind of stuff you suggested for toolbox).
On Mon, 7 May 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> The title of the thread was about "Collaborative Development" :!
>
> The objective of the new repositories are to help share some code
> between all the Tomcats.
>
> While working on using ajp12/ajp13 java code from Tomcat 3.3 CVS,
> I quickly realize
The title of the thread was about "Collaborative Development" :!
The objective of the new repositories are to help share some code
between all the Tomcats.
While working on using ajp12/ajp13 java code from Tomcat 3.3 CVS,
I quickly realize the need for a common toolbox handling
http related ob
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> Mutsaers
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 7:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative
> Development
>
>
> >> "Bip" == Bip Thelin <[EMAI
+1
I think that to have a jakarta-tomcat-sandbox makes sense too...
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: viernes 4 de mayo de 2001 19:18
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] N
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development
>
>
> Over the last few weeks, there has bee
>> "Bip" == Bip Thelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bip> I guess more or less the only reason why TC4 hasn't been
Bip> released as final is because the Servlet/Jsp spec's aren't
Bip> final so when those get final I'll guess that we'll start
Bip> working towards a "real" TC4 release
+1
Amy
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development
> Over the last few weeks, there has be
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Bip Thelin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I've said it before, and i'll say it again -- 3.2 is in maintenance mode,
> > > and doesn't need any further focus for enhancements. Time spent p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I've said it before, and i'll say it again -- 3.2 is in maintenance mode,
> > and doesn't need any further focus for enhancements. Time spent providing
> > enhancements there would be better spent f
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > +1 for separate repository, but I preffer
> >
> > "jakarta-tomcat-modules" or some common repository.
> >
> > Reason: connector and jasper are just particular modules that could be
> > used in multiple versions of tomcat ( like 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 o
. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development
Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
major
+1
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
> collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
> major areas:
>
> * Web connectors
>
> * A new Jasper (the "jasper34" proposal)
>
> and efforts have begun in the HEAD br
Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
> collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
> major areas:
>
> * Web connectors
>
> * A new Jasper (the "jasper34" proposal)
>
> and efforts have begu
On Fri, 4 May 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Did these CVS will be like the jakarta-servletapi and jakarta-watchdog ?
>
The would be like jakarta-servletapi and jakarta-watchdog in the sense
that whey would be separate CVS repositories (with a separate
checkout). They would be unlike Watchdog
>Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
>collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
>major areas:
+1 for the split.
>
>* Web connectors
>
>* A new Jasper (the "jasper34" proposal)
>
>and efforts have begun in the HEAD branch "proposals" director
On Fri, 4 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> +1 for separate repository, but I preffer
>
> "jakarta-tomcat-modules" or some common repository.
>
> Reason: connector and jasper are just particular modules that could be
> used in multiple versions of tomcat ( like 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 or 4.1 ). T
+1 for separate repository, but I preffer
"jakarta-tomcat-modules" or some common repository.
Reason: connector and jasper are just particular modules that could be
used in multiple versions of tomcat ( like 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 or 4.1 ). There
are other pieces that could be developed in the common r
Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on
collaborative development, across the various Tomcat branches, on two
major areas:
* Web connectors
* A new Jasper (the "jasper34" proposal)
and efforts have begun in the HEAD branch "proposals" directory of the
jakarta-tomcat repos
23 matches
Mail list logo
