Re: [POLL] Configuration API of tomcat5

2002-08-09 Thread Costin Manolache
On Fri, 09 Aug 2002 02:24:32 -0700, Remy Maucherat wrote: >> 1. JMX as low-level configuration API. The question is - should we >> follow the path of JBoss and make everything that is configurable an >> MBean, and base the entire architecture on JMX ? The benefits: - >> standard API >> - reasonab

Re: [POLL] Configuration API of tomcat5

2002-08-09 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: > Few questions: > > 1. JMX as low-level configuration API. > The question is - should we follow the path of JBoss and make everything > that is configurable an MBean, and base the entire architecture on JMX ? > The benefits: > - standard API > - reasonably clean > - ea

[POLL] Configuration API of tomcat5

2002-08-08 Thread Costin Manolache
Few questions: 1. JMX as low-level configuration API. The question is - should we follow the path of JBoss and make everything that is configurable an MBean, and base the entire architecture on JMX ? The benefits: - standard API - reasonably clean - easy to integrate with other apps using JMX