CTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:16:45PM -0800, Bill Barker wrote:
>> However, it is the corr
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:16:45PM -0800, Bill Barker wrote:
> However, it is the correct value to pass to Tomcat. Tomcat correctly uses
> this
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:08:48PM +0100, Günter Knauf wrote:
> > Hi Henri,
> > > Th
rBeek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PATHCH] ./jk/native2/server/apache2/jk_service_apache2.c
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:08:48PM +0100, Günter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> > Thanks to resubmit the latest patc
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:08:48PM +0100, Günter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Henri,
> > Thanks to resubmit the latest patch for jk/jk2 on Apache 2 to see if
> > everybody agree
> ok.
> With APR 1.0 apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed without replacement.
> I believe that the patch below is the correct repla
Hi Henri,
> Thanks to resubmit the latest patch for jk/jk2 on Apache 2 to see if
> everybody agree
ok.
With APR 1.0 apr_sockaddr_port_get() was removed without replacement.
I believe that the patch below is the correct replacement to archive _same_ behaviour
as with apr_sockaddr_port_get() before
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Hi Henri,
In JK 1.2.x for Apache 2 we're using :
s->server_name = (char *)ap_get_server_name(r);
...
apr_sockaddr_port_get(&port,r->connection->local_addr);
s->server_port = port;
Do you agree with this, if so I'll do the same for jk2
no, apr_sockaddr_por
Hi Henri,
> In JK 1.2.x for Apache 2 we're using :
> s->server_name = (char *)ap_get_server_name(r);
> ...
> apr_sockaddr_port_get(&port,r->connection->local_addr);
> s->server_port = port;
> Do you agree with this, if so I'll do the same for jk2
no, apr_sockaddr_port_get() was rec
Günter Knauf a écrit :
IMHO, this is wrong. The server port isn't necessarily the port being
listened on. See bug report and patch, long ignored:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
ok, but its as wrong as before - my patch doesnt change the behaviour from what I
see, and
Günter Knauf a écrit :
IMHO, this is wrong. The server port isn't necessarily the port being
listened on. See bug report and patch, long ignored:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
ok, but its as wrong as before - my patch doesnt change the behaviour from what I
see, and t
> IMHO, this is wrong. The server port isn't necessarily the port being
> listened on. See bug report and patch, long ignored:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
ok, but its as wrong as before - my patch doesnt change the behaviour from what I see,
and this is what I can
IMHO, this is wrong. The server port isn't necessarily the port being
listened on. See bug report and patch, long ignored:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:08:28PM +0100, Günter Knauf wrote:
> # patch for APR 1.0 compatiblity
> #
> --- jk_servi
oops, take two: forgot to remove the obsolete port var.
# patch for APR 1.0 compatiblity
#
--- jk_service_apache2.c.orig Tue Sep 30 18:16:14 2003
+++ jk_service_apache2.cWed Jan 21 17:43:14 2004
@@ -343,7 +343,6 @@
static int JK_METHOD jk2_init_ws_service(jk_env_t *env, jk_ws_service_t
13 matches
Mail list logo
