You're right. It should have been "-r TOMCAT_4_1_2" (which checks out fine
for me).
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sandberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:06 PM
Subjec
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:25 PM
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSI Servlet has big problems
>
>
>
>
>>I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following
>>
>>
>command:
>
>
>>[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co
CTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: SSI Servlet has big problems
> I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following
command:
>
> [dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -D "4 months ago" jakarta-tomcat-4.0
>
> And I'm getting th
I tried an absolute date first. April didn't work. Does this work on
your end?
>have even had CVS directories in it with sticky tags already set...
>ie: keeping me from easily getting the latest without checking out
>the whole source tree from scratch.
Hmm. That is a possibility. Definitely
(resending from my progeeks.com address to avoid being filtered/delayed
by moderation.)
Dan Sandberg wrote:
>
> Ugh this is painful. I'll checkout your stuff within the next few days.
> If the architecture looks good and does have significantly greater
> functionality I will merge my changes
(resending from my progeeks.com address to avoid being filtered/delayed
by moderation.)
Don't know... have you tried an absolute date or is "4 months ago"
just an example for the list's benefit. Any date in feb/april should
be sufficiently late enough.
Hope it works,
-Paul
Dan Sandberg wrote:
I'm trying to checkout an old version of tomcat with the following command:
[dan@oogie tmp]$ cvs co -D "4 months ago" jakarta-tomcat-4.0
And I'm getting the following error:
Core dumped; preserving /tmp/cvs-serv41751 on server.
CVS locks may need cleaning up.
My version is (on Linux):
>[dan@
Ugh this is painful. I'll checkout your stuff within the next few days.
If the architecture looks good and does have significantly greater
functionality I will merge my changes into your code.
I also fixed the included variable problem and the nested include
problems. The conditional stuff
Dan Sandberg wrote:
>
> Yes, let's merge them together. How do I get to the code that you
> fixed? Were the test cases in CVS?
It's all in CVS. If you checkout the source code from some time in
December you should get it all back in util and util/ssi. It looks
like my last check-in was on
Yes, let's merge them together. How do I get to the code that you
fixed? Were the test cases in CVS?
I'd say lets get all the test cases setup, and see where my code fails
your tests. Then we can use your code wherever functionality is missing.
I thought I had checked out the head revision.
(Resending from my older address in hopes that it will help avoid
some confusion.)
Hmmm...
This is what I get for ignoring the list for a while. ;)
Note: I completely rewrote the SSI support in 4.x HEAD and had Bip
apply the patches (Amy also did some patching) for exactly the same
reasons yo
Hi everyone.
Here are more changes to the SSI code.
I have a test case ( comparing SSI behavior to Apache by using .shtml
files in different tomcat webapps / apache directories ) which I have
not included because I'm not sure where to put manual test cases like
this. If there is an apprior
12 matches
Mail list logo
