Re: [PATCH] Possible fix for bug #373

2000-11-28 Thread Gomez Henri
> OK, I have studied Doug's patch and do not see how it can cause any > potential > regression problems. Therefore, I've committed the patch to the 3.2 > code base. > Henri/Doug/others could you please to a fresh checkout of the > "tomcat_32" branch > and try this out? There is still time to rev

Re: [PATCH] Possible fix for bug #373

2000-11-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
OK, I have studied Doug's patch and do not see how it can cause any potential regression problems. Therefore, I've committed the patch to the 3.2 code base. Henri/Doug/others could you please to a fresh checkout of the "tomcat_32" branch and try this out? There is still time to revert the patch

RE: [PATCH] Possible fix for bug #373

2000-11-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
u >-Original Message- >From: Clinton, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 3:07 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PATCH] Possible fix for bug #373 > > >Further to my earlier message, I've been investigating the problem with >ajp13 a

[PATCH] Possible fix for bug #373

2000-11-24 Thread Clinton, Doug
Further to my earlier message, I've been investigating the problem with ajp13 and found the following. RequestDispatcher.forward() calls realResponse.finish() as its final action. However, ContextManager.service() also calls finish() on the response which results in two packets of type JK_AJP13_E