[PATCH] Bug 23267

The attached patches address a couple of issue highlighted by bug 23267 - zero length contexts caused a NPE on contextFile.getParentFile() - another exception on contextPath.substring(1) for zero length contexts I also removed the filename.equals("ROOT") test as I couldn't see anywhere in the doc

Re: [PATCH] Bug 23267

Mark Thomas wrote: Thanks for looking at this. I'll look into porting the necessary deployer changes to get this working on TC4. I didn't test with TC 4. Maybe the patch can stand alone by itself, and is relevant. But I know the deployer doesn't handle well similar situations. Remy -

RE: [PATCH] Bug 23267

Thanks for looking at this. I'll look into porting the necessary deployer changes to get this working on TC4. Mark On Saturday, September 27, 2003 1:26 PM, Remy Maucherat [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: > > > Resending. I have been having email problems recently. Apologies i

Re: [PATCH] Bug 23267

Mark Thomas wrote: Resending. I have been having email problems recently. Apologies if this is received twice. The attached patches address a couple of issue highlighted by bug 23267 - zero length contexts caused a NPE on contextFile.getParentFile() - another exception on contextPath.substring(1

Re: [PATCH] Bug 23267

Mark Thomas wrote: Resending. I have been having email problems recently. Apologies if this is received twice. The attached patches address a couple of issue highlighted by bug 23267 - zero length contexts caused a NPE on contextFile.getParentFile() - another exception on contextPath.substring(1)

[PATCH] Bug 23267

Resending. I have been having email problems recently. Apologies if this is received twice. The attached patches address a couple of issue highlighted by bug 23267 - zero length contexts caused a NPE on contextFile.getParentFile() - another exception on contextPath.substring(1) for zero length co