Re: [5.0] JARs handling, and other 5.0.3 changes

2003-06-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, All that as part of an effort to reduce Tomcat memory footprint (to make it more suitable for large scale deployments), I'm just curious how the two go together? Wouldn't large-scale deployments care less if tomcat's memory footprint was larger? It's typically the s

RE: [5.0] JARs handling, and other 5.0.3 changes

2003-06-12 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, >All that as part of an effort to reduce Tomcat memory footprint (to make >it more suitable for large scale deployments), I'm just curious how the two go together? Wouldn't large-scale deployments care less if tomcat's memory footprint was larger? It's typically the small (micro, on chips,

[5.0] JARs handling, and other 5.0.3 changes

2003-06-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I plan to try to get rid (as much as I can) of JAR URLs inside the Catalina (and Jasper) processing, because of the issues which (still, unfortunately :-( ) plague them in the JDK. I will use the fact that all the JAR URLs returned by the classloader are actually file based. I hope that wa