Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-06 Thread Ken Horn
coste (Frisurf)" To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [5.0] In

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-06 Thread Lacoste (Frisurf)
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 18:40, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Great ! > > If you could come up with a better name for the "substract" method ;-) > It's supposed to be the opposite of append. I found this: >From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.44 [gcid

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-06 Thread Chris Brown
> If you could come up with a better name for the "substract" method ;-) > It's supposed to be the opposite of append. prepend() ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Great ! If you could come up with a better name for the "substract" method ;-) It's supposed to be the opposite of append. The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web services, as long as they use t

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-05 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Great ! > > If you could come up with a better name for the "substract" method ;-) > It's supposed to be the opposite of append. > > The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web > services, as long as they use the Tomcat rea

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Great ! If you could come up with a better name for the "substract" method ;-) It's supposed to be the opposite of append. The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web services, as long as they use the Tomcat reader. Hopefully, I'll be able to writ

Re: [5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-05 Thread Costin Manolache
Great ! Costin Remy Maucherat wrote: > I've committed input optimization similar to the OutputBuffer used in > the Coyote adapter. It appears to work ok (although > BufferedWriter.readLine still needs to be implemented). > > I'm against porting this patch to 4.1.x, as it is a risky change (whi

[5.0] Input optimization

2003-01-05 Thread Remy Maucherat
I've committed input optimization similar to the OutputBuffer used in the Coyote adapter. It appears to work ok (although BufferedWriter.readLine still needs to be implemented). I'm against porting this patch to 4.1.x, as it is a risky change (which will need lots of testing) with only a few ca