Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-04 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is a

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Filip Hanik wrote: we have a project on sourceforge to continue development of this. but we would love to integrate this into Tomcat where it really belongs. http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcat-jg It seems JavaGroup could be a great candidate as jakarta project, you even got the right look :)

RE: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Filip Hanik
age- >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:50 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: [5.0] Cluster features > > >Hi, > >I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. >Despite some licensing dicre

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Costin Manolache wrote: Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: I'll remove stuff in the Cluster API, modify some of the session classes to allow extending them in a different package, and everything in the core is then independent of the clustering. No security problems if we kept the current p

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Costin Manolache
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: >> I'll remove stuff in the Cluster API, modify some of the session >> classes to allow extending them in a different package, and everything >> in the core is then independent of the clustering. > > No security problems if we kept the current package protection > mech

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Costin Manolache
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: +1 if all new code goes in a separate module ( instead of catalina ), and is built as separate .jar(s). >>>I wanted to, however I can't do that without changing the API some stuff >>>in the session package (the damn classes are all package private

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 if all new code goes in a separate module ( instead of catalina ), and is built as separate .jar(s). I wanted to, however I can't do that without changing the API some stuff in the session package (the damn classes

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 if all new code goes in a separate module ( instead of catalina ), and is built as separate .jar(s). I wanted to, however I can't do that without changing the API some stuff in the session package (the damn classes are all package pri

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: +1 if all new code goes in a separate module ( instead of catalina ), and is built as separate .jar(s). I wanted to, however I can't do that without changing the API some stuff in the session package (the damn classes are all package private) :-P

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: >> +1 if all new code goes in a separate module ( instead of catalina ), >> and is built as separate .jar(s). > > I wanted to, however I can't do that without changing the API some stuff > in the session package (the damn classes are all package private) :-P > > I suppose

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is a

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. > Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the > task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago > by Filip Hanik. Based on what is already done, th

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is already

RE: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Shapira, Yoav
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:50 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: [5.0] Cluster features > >Hi, > >I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. >Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the >

Re: [5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is already done, the amount of

[5.0] Cluster features

2002-12-03 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I think the clustering features in Tomcat 5 should get an overhaul. Despite some licensing dicrepancies, I plan to use JavaGroups for the task (LGPL license), as well as some code which was donated a while ago by Filip Hanik. Based on what is already done, the amount of work that will have to