Re: [FAQ] jGuru FAQ Update

As I said in my original post, I had it daily for a few days so I could work out the kinks. It's weekly now (and has been for over a week). Sorry for the confusion. - A On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:40:26AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Su

Re: [TC4] jakarta-regexp.jar

> >The problem you are having can be easily resolved by simply editing your > >local jakarta-turbine-4.0/build.properties or your > >${user.home}/build.properties > > Why could still use symlink as I do in my RPM :) > > ln -s jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar jakarta-regexp.jar Yes, these are all possibl

Re: [TC4] jakarta-regexp.jar

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:58:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Do you have a position on including a jakarta-regexp.jar (or a > > jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar or a jakarta-regexp-1.3-dev.jar) directly in > > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/lib so we

Re: [TC4] jakarta-regexp.jar

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:35:43PM -0700, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 7/19/01 7:08 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > P.S. I'd like to propose that jakarta-regexp project name all their > > jars jakarta-regexp.jar no matter what version they are. This doesn't > > affect the de

[TC4] jakarta-regexp.jar

The build files for tc4 refer to jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar. However, the regexp project currently builds a file called "jakarta-regexp-1.3-dev.jar". The jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar is nowhere to be found, so the build breaks for someone (like me) following the instructions for a clean checkout-and-build

Re: Nice script to change all those cvsroots?

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:22:32AM +0200, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > Has anyone got a nice script to replace the jakarta.apache.org cvsroot to > the cvs.apache.org cvs root? This does all and only what you want: find . -name Root -print | grep CVS | xargs perl -pi -e 's/jakarta\.apache\.org/

Re: [DOC] INSTALL.txt

Neat! It might be better to split "INSTALLATION" into two separate sections, one for Windows, one for Unix. HOWTOs work best with fewer conditionals. - A On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 08:23:10PM -0400, Rob S. wrote: > Along the right line? Used the formatting from the TC4 readme files. > > Needs

Re: OT - HTML dev-list filter?

I don't know how but I'd +1 it. Actually I do know how, sort of -- ezmlm-make has an option -x that configures it with "extras" including html rejecting. But I'm not sure how to apply it to a running list. ezmlm is kind of unfriendly. Read through the ezmlm FAQ for info. One annoying thing I r

Re: [FAQ] jGuru FAQ Update

Sure, it could, but (a) I don't think one message a week will be enough traffic to bother anyone, and (b) sometimes developer-related FAQs show up on the Tomcat list. Also, usually it's developers who can answer these FAQs (or augment them) so I'd like to wave them under their noses and see if an

[FAQ] jGuru FAQ Update

otify - Hi. You asked to be notified daily when certain jGuru.com items get new entries. You can shut email notification off at the FAQ home page(s) or: http://www.jguru.com/guru/notifyprefs.jsp ++ JavaServer Pages (JSP) FAQ: http://www.jguru.com/faq/JSP How can I prevent Micros

Re: [anoncvs@jakarta.apache.org-error]Connection refused

The Apache CVS server was reconfigured over the weekend. Try again soon. - A On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 12:45:54PM +0100, Morrison, John wrote: > Try > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic > login > > J. > > -Original Me

Re: Suggestions (was Re: hello everyone (regarding documentation))

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:39:12AM +0200, Alex Fernández wrote: > Hi Hiten! > > hiten pandya wrote: > > i am planning to start my own documentation project for Tomcat 3.3 and 4.0. > > The different thing about this project is that, i am going to port all of > > the tomcat documentation to XML Doc

Re: First day - RE: PROPOSAL: Tomcat docs

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:37:55AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > We might not need to spend as much time on the generic "how to build a web > application" stuff, now that other resources are available -- and focus on > the stuff that is important for configuration, like all the stuff that

Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [TomcatDocu mentation Redactors To Hire]

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:06:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > * Docs should live in the source tree of the project that they > are about. Although Henri's suggestion for jakarta-tomcat-docs > is noble, what you'll find in practice is that there is very little > documentation tha

Re: Tomcat Documentation Project

On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:34:39PM -0500, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-) > > > > Thats a strong word, some parts are very good, some could use work. Agreed; I was just using the term from a prior thread. > > 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomc

Tomcat Documentation Project

Leaving aside the issue of file format for just one second... Are we agreed on the following? 1. Tomcat documentation sucks :-) 2. There needs to be a new CVS project called jakarta-tomcat-doc. My reasoning is that we want to avoid the fragmentation of documentation into different trees for 3