Quoting Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> on 2002/11/3 2:24 PM, "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know you have a much better machine, but 1600 transactions does seem a
> > bit high.
>
> Not for porn.
Nah... they wouldn&
ave a much better machine, but 1600 transactions does seem a
bit high. By all means, do your own benchmarks before you commit to
anything.
Bojan
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 18:39, ryan wrote:
> 1. For a project my company is working on we have transactions
> requirements of 1600 transactions pe
(this includes signal delivery and other problems).
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
on algorithm, which is usually "lazy", so more then absolutely
necessary will be allocated etc.
> I already read in the forum Tomcat don't manage the memory, it is the
> JVM... so why the jvm use so many processes ?
This is configurable in server.xml, I think. However, if you
dreaming Pier ;-)
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 03:24, Costin Manolache wrote:
> I would like to propose a new mailing list.
>
> The list will be closed to commiters only. The main purpose
> will be discussions of security and other special issues.
> This should avoid [Cc] threads.
>
> The main target should be active c
hat in the range of 640 Mb...
> :-) (and it's just 1 web-application out of 6)
>
> Only problem? Tomcat doesn't scale "that high" :-(
Since you like segfaults better then NPE's and you seem to need performance,
maybe you should try CSP's: http://astro.temple
Quoting Eugene Gluzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please help. How can i trace this further? How do i get apache to
> generate a core file so i can see where in apache code this is? Any
> pointers for help here at all?
Have a look at this: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.htm
Just ignore... I should read my e-mail from the most recent :-(
Bojan
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 10:39, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> So, there was an MMN bump in Apache 2.0.43? From what I can tell, that's
> not the case...
>
> Bojan
>
> On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:13, Henri Gom
So, there was an MMN bump in Apache 2.0.43? From what I can tell, that's
not the case...
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:13, Henri Gomez wrote:
> We should provide new binaries for JK and JK2.
>
> I'll do JK/JK2 for Linux boxes (and FreeBSD)
>
> Who could do the same
h 3 if you don't
have time for 1.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1
Bojan
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 19:13, Henri Gomez wrote:
> If everybody agree, what about removing src/native for tomcat 3.3.2 ?
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
Just compiled and tested mod_jk 1.2.0 from CVS, Apache 2.0.42. Seems as
solid as ever... Good stuff!
Bojan
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 01:03, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Jakarta-Tomcat-Connector team is pleased to announce the
> availability of JK 1.2.0.
>
> JK, also kno
Quoting Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm agreeing with Costin. Please move this discussion to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is off-topic here.
Promise not to write a single byte on this topic on Tomcat-Dev list after this
e-mail.
Bojan
-
Quoting Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
> > All right then, let's talk about JSP's. If I host my clients' JSP's on my
> > server and a web designer puts this in (BTW, he wasn't forced, he simply
> > decided
Not if:
runtime.interpolate.string.literals = false
Bojan
Quoting Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That's what code reviews are for and in absence of that - firing your
> developers.
>
> Wouldn't I also get an out of memory with this
of Tomcat,
possibly owned by some other clients of mine. Completely unacceptable...
Web applications are collection programs and other stuff, for instance web
pages. However, web pages should not be programs because they are (usually)
maintained by non-programmers. The fact that yo
SP's actually is.
> Please no flames from the velocity disiples as I will not respond.
Why do you think anyone from Velocity crowd would flame you? I found
most users and developers to be helpful and constructive. They certainly
helped me switch from JSP's in no time at all.
Bojan
Nicely done!
Bojan
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 19:30, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Just a suggestion.
>
>
> MT.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e
explanation made
another one funny, as in "ha, ha". I was just having a few laughs,
that's all.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >
> >> In the C language we use #ifdef not #ifef :-)
> >
> >
> > Only if something like this works:
> >
> > #define #i
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In the C language we use #ifdef not #ifef :-)
Only if something like this works:
#define #ifef #idef
;-)
> -#idef AS400
> +#ifdef AS400
Bojan
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/im
template doesn't do anything but templating. The beef if
elsewhere (i.e. MVC).
Bojan
PS. Glenn, my apologies, I was just answering a direct question.
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of other forums for discussing the merits of one
> web templating technology vs another.
Sure. But it's fun :-)
Bojan
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 07:31, Matt Fury wrote:
> What's easier though? Upgrading a Tomcat server with a
> patch or re-architecting your whole site to accomodate
> for Velocity??
Short term, upgrading Tomcat. Long term, doing it in Velocity.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Sounds good. If you find nobody to build for Apache 2.0.4x on Linux, let
me know.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 21:27, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since there is no major showstoppers and
> a) The vhosts should work now
> b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved
>
> Here is the
I think this also applies to 1.3. It's just that MMN in it hasn't been
changed for a while.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 20:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hgomez 2002/09/24 03:23:51
>
> Modified:jk/xdocs faq.xml
> Log:
> Add information about MMNB (Mag
n:
1. Disable it completely in server.xml
2. Remove unwanted XML parser JAR's manually
I'm OK with any, really.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ve this release
> -1 [ ] No, because:
>
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 20:04, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Sounds good (although I have to admit I haven't compiled mod_jk from CVS
> > for a while).
>
> Just take a look, cvs should be tagged tomorrow ;)
I'll try...
Bojan
--
To unsubs
Sounds good (although I have to admit I haven't compiled mod_jk from CVS
for a while).
+1
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 20:40, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> Now that code and odc is stabilized in mod_jk 1.2.0, it could be time to
> do the release :
>
> Proposals
and easier to maintain. That was the point of my e-mail.
As for Jasper, don't know, but I'm sure there will be people that do.
Bojan
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
pirits ;-)
Anyway, there is a serious side to all this as JSP's are inherently
evil. You'll find that creating true MVC applications in Velocity is
almost trivial. I suggest you do read Jon's article. The fact that JSP's
are "official", doesn't mean they are good.
Boj
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - + user="admin" password="changeillico"/>
Shouldn't the above be "authentication", not "authentification"?
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 19:46, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Now that we have mod_jk present on JTC, what about removing it from TC
> 3.3.2 CVS ?
+1
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you'll be laughing.
Bojan
Quoting Martin Mc Atamney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a servlet which produces straight HTML. In the HTML I'd like to
> embed an applet tag. My servlet is in com.test.servlet, my applet in
> com.test.applet.
>
> I set the code value i
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 03:56, micael wrote:
> I will investigate this and do thank you.
You are welcome.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Trevor Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would also like to get an idea of how long it will be until Tomcat 5
> has been released.
Although I'm not actively participating in development, I can confidently say
that it's going to be befo
Quoting micael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to move
> particular files out of a group, so the sort of graphic tool you are
> talking about is useless to me.
Which one was the graphic tool? Not following...
Bojan
-
This mail s
s rsync a better choice for this kind of work, especially if you're
doing it while Tomcat is running. Also, rsync has sophisticated pattern
matching, which makes it, well, suitable for (remote) syncing :-)
Bojan
Quoting micael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks, Bojan, but I use a
http://rsync.samba.org/
Bojan
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 08:37, micael wrote:
> I need to copy all the files (drilled down in directories recursively) that
> end in ".jsp" to another location and write over the files in that
> location. Anyone have the command for a Red Hat 7.
e a problem with IE, mozilla allready show it at left,
> I'll fix the xsl/css
Probably something that was introduced with IE 6. I noticed some of my
web work was broken in the same way.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ ]
> mod_jk-logo15.png [ ]
> mod_jk-logo16.png [ ]
> mod_jk-logo3.jpg [ ]
> mod_jk-logo4.jpg [ ]
> mod_jk-logo5.jpg [X]
> mod_jk-logo6.jpg [ ]
>
> As logo for mod_jk documentation.
>
The surfing Tomcat!
Bojan
PS. Actually, I think we should adopt both 5 and 6 and let pe
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 23:51, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> > De: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Enviado el: 30 de agosto de 2002 1:11
> > Para: Tomcat Dev List
> > Asunto: RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 23:4
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 23:49, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> We know how r->parsed_uri.port gets his value?
Yep. It's getting it from the URL, not the headers.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
. And given the error message (An
unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM), I would
investigate the patch status of the machine quite seriously.
Bojan
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
--
To unsubs
One more thing - check if the OS has all the relevant patches. Sometimes it's
the libraries that JDK's using.
Bojan
Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Taral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Try a different JDK. This doesn't look a Tomcat prob
ine new meanings for the
> CGI spec.
Pretty cool, ha?
:-))
Bojan
-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Taral Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Try a different JDK. This doesn't look a Tomcat problem.
Bojan
> Hi
>
> I am facing strange problem at one of my customers side.
> I am using tomcat 3.3 for my devlopment and its working fine.
>
> But at one of customers s
Quoting Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not anymore. ;-) In the current 2.4 spec draft it is required to be taken
> from the Host header.
Huh, I guess that's that then. The bug does seem to be valid. At least according
to the n
/* default */
return port;
}
This doesn't seem like coming from headers, but rather from URL or as
indicated by the server itself. What do you think?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
source in the bug
report.
The real problem is that the bug report asks to go a step further and to
fake the ports when there is a load balancer or firewall in front of
Apache/Tomcat combo. I don't think we should do that - load balancer or
firewall is not part of the container.
Bojan
--
To un
lcome :-)
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
> > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >> In order to change the uid from root to a regular user, you will add
> >> user.name=...
> >> user.group=...
> >> in jk2
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In order to change the uid from root to a regular user, you will add
> user.name=...
> user.group=...
> in jk2.properties.
I'm not too familiar with this - which part here is running as root?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[E
Legend!
Bojan
On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 18:37, Henri Gomez wrote:
> The TC 4.1.9 beta rpms are available :
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.9-beta/rpms/
>
> Nota that we share now the rpms with the jpackage project (www.jpackage.org), so
> fo
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 18:56, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 00:50, Henri Gomez wrote:
> >
> > Welcome back from holidays,
>
> Thanks
>
> > hope you had a good time...
>
> Rainy ;[
ur
example to 4.1.9? My understanding is that the web server (Apache) part
doesn't care much about what's behind it, as long as it speaks the
correct protocol version. Maybe there should be a README file instead,
listing all known Tomcat version combos for a particular JTC version...
Bojan
Neat :-)
Bojan
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 19:43, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some comments regarding reverse uri mappings.
>
> This is the simplest way of accomplishing the reverse mapping (I'm not
> sure if this is correct terminology).
>
> There is addi
will then
happily serve them.
2. Anything else, rewrite to URL that match something that's in mod_jk's
space.
Bojan
On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 16:31, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, Augu
Doesn't mod_rewrite do what you want here? In combination with
mod_proxy, it can rewrite URL to URL as well, so you can get the
resulting URL back in mod_jk and then just use normal mappings. Or maybe
I'm on a totally wrong track here...
As for IIS, dunno, don't care ;-)
Bojan
Cool!
Bojan
Quoting Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:00 AM
> > To: Tomcat Dev List
> > Subject: RE: mod_jk, mod_jk2 URI spaces
>
anything not
specifically targeted for Apache goes to Tomcat. As long as this doesn't
affect current situation (and I don't see how it would) where I can set
up that Tomcat only gets what's not specifically targeted for Apache,
I'm +1. This would make mod_jk configuration really fl
. Please test and let
me know if anything is broken or just plain unacceptable.
Bojan
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> bojan 2002/07/29 19:13:05
>
> Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
> Log:
> Introduce a working ForwardDirectories implementation into mod
bojan 2002/07/29 19:13:05
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
Log:
Introduce a working ForwardDirectories implementation into mod_jk 1.2.0 for
Apache 1.3.x.
Major changes:
- mod_jk requires mod_dir
- jk_fixups() function introduced
- jk_translate() knows how
isn't included in the native build's includes. This is probably a
> known issue, but a quick search doesn't appear to reveal any
> hits. Shall I post a proper bug report?
By all means. Unless, of course, you can find such bug in Bugzilla
already. If you attach a patch with the bug
Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2. Make explicit request from jk_fixups (new function)
Actually, this would break Apache completely, because serving requests from
non-handlers is not allowed. However...
I have developed solution for this problem invol
thing else, build from source or use
the old version.
If someone contributes a binary, then by all means, it should be
published, but otherwise it shouldn't be a target.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bojan 2002/07/24 04:38:13
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
Log:
Introduce ForwardDirectories option into mod_jk for Apache 1.3.x, for
compatibility with Apache 2.x version. Does nothing for now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +5 -1 jakarta-tomcat
hanks. I'm not sure about mod_jk2 either. The latest reports show that
> > the code still doesn't work.
>
> Great to have it in jk 1.2.x.
>
> BTW, what's the default behaviour ?
Default is to let Apache do it's thing.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Try running:
./buildconf.sh
./configure --apxs2=/path/to/apxs
and then just dump the mod_jk2.so (should be in jk/build/jk2/apache2)
into your Apache *.so directory, apply the appropriate LoadModule and
you should be set.
I had problems building with ant too...
Bojan
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 17
apply something
like the above to it.
Bojan
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 14:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bojan 2002/07/23 21:48:52
>
> Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bojan 2002/07/23 21:48:52
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Save a strcmp() call.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
bojan 2002/07/23 19:38:32
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Refine directory handling a bit more. Make use of the new JkOption,
ForwardDirectories. When enabled, all unresolved directory requests go
to Tomcat. This option is disabled by default.
Revision
bojan 2002/07/23 19:36:36
Modified:jk/native/common jk_global.h
Log:
New JkOption: ForwardDirectories. If used, all unresolved directory requests
will be handled by Tomcat. By default, this option will be turned off.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +3 -1 jakarta
bojan 2002/07/23 17:44:20
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Kick out DIR_MAGIC_TYPE from jk2_handler() since it is never given to it
anyway. This will have to be resolved later for mod_jk2.
Make sure main request gets the appropriate info when the sub
onfig
> option however. JkOptions is probably fine for 1.2. Not sure where it
> should be set in Jk2.
Thanks. I'm not sure about mod_jk2 either. The latest reports show that
the code still doesn't work.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t
> *.jsp ajp13.
That would be handled by Apache anyway through the usual DirectoryIndex
machinery, so no problems there.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And I answer (to myself :-)
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> So, the unsolved questions for me are:
>
> 1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the
> request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is included in the test? It must be that its mapping
on DIR_MAGIC_TYPE test in
jk_handler(). How's that going to work in mod_jk2, I have no idea... Hopefully,
Mark will do a few tests and then we'll know more.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
be that its mapping
is 'better' than mapping of jk_translate()...
2. Or is it that jk_translate() never even gets involved during that request and
therefore never has the chance to do the mapping?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I made an initial, most likely broken commit of this code for mod_jk2.
Can you go through it as I'm making assumptions in there that I am not
sure about. They are just a parallel from mod_jk, but that could be
totally bogus.
At least there is some 'meat' for you guys to play with.
bojan 2002/07/22 16:18:38
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Initial, most likely *BROKEN* code to handle default directory files. The
code in jk2_map_to_storage() should be OK.
Most critical stuff is in jk2_handler() function, the part of code that
gt; 0 )
How do I go through this mine field? What's going to be the value of
uriEnv if r->handler is DIR_MAGIC_TYPE? If it's going to be NULL, I have
to change a lot of code in the whole function to make sure we don't bump
into a NULL pointer somewhere...
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-07-2
---
THE CODE IN mod_jk2 IS STILL BROKEN, WITH DocumentRoot LOGIC.
-
Do you want me to:
[ ] Revert it back to what it was before I put my fingers in it
[ ] Leave it alone
[ ] Attempt to apply the same stuff that's in this patch
bojan 2002/07/22 14:03:19
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Put back DIR_MAGIC_TYPE in case there is no DirectoryIndex and/or no
pysical files to stat.
Lose one stat, not really needed. Fix a typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +10 -5 jakarta
urely
selfish reasons ;-)
- map you servlet in web.xml to your liking
- read excellent Velocity User Guide and Velocity Programmers Guide
- ask about anything you'd like to know on Velocity user list; majority of the
people are very friendly and don't mind being asked questions
Have fun,
My apologies everyone... Just ignore the part of my previous e-mail marked here
with between the stars. It just plain stupid :-(
**
Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting [EMAIL
asically, static files would be preferred (I don't like the idea of involving
Tomcat if I don't need to either). Does that eliminate the objection?
Bojan
PS. I have applied ap_is_directory() call in the latest version of the patch. Do
you think I should have stuck with determining if t
>
> I think this would work and is the best short-term solution.
>
> If it is a DIR, let tomcat serve it for now.
I can implement that easily. But there is one catch: static files would get
checked first (through the code in jk_map_to_storage()) and if the match wasn't
found (either because there is no DirecoryIndex or there were no physical files
that Apache can find), the the raw directory would hit jk_handler(). Is that a
problem?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lso to DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests. Now, jk_handler() would
find the mapping (since the request is for a directory, not a file) and the
request would be served by Tomcat.
Would this work? I think it might...
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t I try to fix it properly in mod_jk 1.2.0 and let you guys do whatever
you like in mod_jk2?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bojan 2002/07/21 19:48:11
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Be a bit more specific about what is a directory.
Revision ChangesPath
1.51 +10 -13jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
t term, I think we should just let tomcat deal
> with that, until we have the fix.
Are you referring here to mod_jk2 only or both mod_jk 1.2.0 and mod_jk2?
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 22 Jul 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>
> > If there is no physical file, then nothing will get done by the patch
> at
> > all (since r->finfo.filetype is 0). It won't affect mod_dir's old
> > behaviour at all. I'm not sur
are major objections
to the code in the first place. Please consider this as just an attempt
to correct the brain dead code that involved DocumentRoot, rather then
actual file location and mixing URI's with filenames, nothing more.
Bojan
On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 08:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
&g
bojan 2002/07/21 15:34:25
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Instead of mixing URI's with filenames, which was wrong, just use filenames to stat.
This will also take care of aliases, but be warned - URI will still be passed to
Tomcat unchanged.
Revision Ch
re why would that be a must for all cases. I don't want
Java engaged if C does can do the job and faster.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e not physical and local, mod_dir and DirectoryIndex
don't make sense and should not be used
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
let people know about it
I can live with any of the above since I fully control my own
environment and can adjust accordingly.
Bojan
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 21:20, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Just to prove the concept put the following in your workers2.properties
>
> [uri:/*.jsp]
> info=
1 - 100 of 372 matches
Mail list logo