John Holman wrote:
>
> As said before I'd like to add the ability to search the directory for the
> user's dn to cover cases when a fixed pattern will not work, but will wait
> to see the fate of this patch before going ahead.
Regarding the "search, then bind" authentication; what would be the
s
John Holman wrote:
>
> > I preferred binding to the directory with supplied credentials because it
> > allows the realm implementation to use an anonymous password for the rest
> of
> > what it needs.
+1
> The only advantage I can see
> for having the realm retrieve the password is that it make
Ellen Lockhart wrote:
>
> The jakarta website encourages people to get involved; I am a little
> disappointed to not receive at least a "thanks but no thanks" response. But
> I am glad that there is now a realm implementation that will work with LDAP
> for tomcat.
This list is a little slow to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> craigmcc01/04/18 11:59:30
>
> Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java
> ContextConfig.java EngineConfig.java
> HostConfig.java
> Log:
> Catalina: Restore the recognition of ,
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> >
> > * Support for two major modes of operation:
> >
> > * SYSTEM LOGIN. Realm implementation binds itself to the server using
> > a system-level username/password, then reads the usern
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> * Support for two major modes of operation:
>
> * SYSTEM LOGIN. Realm implementation binds itself to the server using
> a system-level username/password, then reads the username and password
> attributes to perform authentication (analogous to how JDBC
Julian Payne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Jakarta-Tomcat 3.2.1 and when I upgraded to the 4.0 beta 3
> I have a propblem with my JNDI configuration.
>
> I have a servlet that uses an EJB container that requires the following
> "jndi.properties" :
>
> java.naming.factory.initial
> com.s
I'm still trying to use Realms on a per webapp context basis. This seems
to be harder than I first imagined.
Could someone from the tomcat developemt team please comment on whether
this is possible or not at all?
There are comments in the source that indicates that in theory this
should be po
Is there anyone that maintain an LXR (or cvsweb) view of the tomcat
development source, or current beta3 source somewhere?
--
- Torgeir
Btw, if I replace the instanceof test with a
getClass().getName().equals("org.apache.naming.ResourceRef")
it all works.
--
- Torgeir
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> If you don't mind specifying the resource factory class yourself, you
> don't need to modify any code at all -- just configure it in server.xml
> like this:
>
>
> ...
>type="com.mycompany.ContextPool"/>
>
>
> factory
I need to look at the behaviour of the jndi provider inside tomcat.
Are there any tricks to debugging tomcat?
--
- Torgeir
I've read in a post by Remy with subject: "Re:
Implementation in 4.0.b1",
http://w4.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2001/Mar/msg00273.html that the only
two factories supported in tomcat right now is one for getting Tyrex
managed data sources & User Transactions.
I'm interested in getting a resource f
13 matches
Mail list logo