Thanks a lot! I appreciate the extra effort.
Sean
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [4.1.27] Builds uploaded
>
>
> Sean Reilly wrote:
> >
>
> (Note: I decided to skip the LE builds, because I am lazy and people
> have been confused by them; I'll add them this WE if there's
> some demand)
>
I for one would love to see the LE builds. We find them very useful; our build
process is also tailored to th
String getHeaderString() {
> StringBuffer result = new StringBuffer();
> Vector keys = headerhash.getKeys();
> for(int idx = 0; idx < keys.size(); idx++) {
>result.append(keys.elementAt(idx)+":
> "+headerhash.get(keys.elementAt(idx)));
>
nal Message-
> From: Claudio Bisegni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Http version error
>
>
> yes there are tow space you think this is the problem???
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at
let;jsessionid= HTTP/1.1
> User-Agent: WSDA_SWCLIENT
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream
> Content-length: 19
> FRAMEWORK_VERSION: 0.0WSDAFM
>
> but the error remain
>
> I flow this rewest acros a socket
> any idea?
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 10:14 PM, Sea
Unless you formatted the email strangely, you have an invalid HTTP request.
The directive (POST) the URI, and the version must all be on the first line.
Also, the tag in the Content-Length header shouldn't be there (I assume
that's an email formatted thing, but just in case).
So the request shou
ajor version change
of Tomcat + a JVM change wouldn't incur much more overhead than testing a major
version change of Tomcat alone. Does anyone have any
comments/opinions/counterarguments? Or should I just shut my trap and concentrate on
the other reasons requiring J2SE 1.4 is a bad idea
CVSZilla (http://homepages.kcbbs.gen.nz/~tonyg/) supports this kind of functionality
quite nicely.
Sean Reilly
Software Architect, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> (snip)
>
> One last general request that is not fo
list seem to be), we're
probably a pretty good example. We served 52,708 page views yesterday (of definitely
non-static content) from two dual p3 800mhz boxes, and when cpu usage goes over 5% on
either machine, we get seriously upset.
http://usediron.point2.com
Sean Reilly
Prog
jikes?
Sean Reilly
Programmer, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13084] - jsp compilation with jikes fails
soon as the
context is ready to process requests.
Sean
Sean Reilly
Programmer, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Stefanos Karasavvidis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:55
: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
> Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
>
>> Sean Reilly wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted bug #11091
>>> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:20 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month
Sean Reilly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted bug #11091
> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July
23rd.
> Since then, nobody besides
anyone looked into this bug at all? Are there any plans to fix it?
Any comments at all would be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Sean
Sean Reilly
Programmer, Point2 Technologies, Inc.
(306) 955-1855
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
