Remy,
I checked the cvs and found there are some number of changes in the
writer and response in coyote starting from 4.1.12. (See the diff from
4.1.12). Many of the changes are started at around 4.1.15/16.
I think there is the problem in the roll out procedures, especially when
a release is
What if:
1. load balancer receives a request for http://server/
2. does httpd return http://server:81/ in Location? (I don't think so)
And also what if
1. load balancer receives a request for http://server/somecontext/index.jsp?
Punky
Filip Hanik wrote:
I should also note that this scenario wor
"50c0e-5b0-3af1f126;3d4965c6"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 1456
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Language: en
Expires: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:23:18 GMT
Connection closed by foreign host.
=========
Punky Tse wrote:
> Neil,
>
Neil,
I will try tonight if I encounter the same problem. BTW, if you can
choose, why not move to httpd 2.0? At least Pier and me support it! ;-)
Punky
Neil Cronin wrote:
> I'm trying to build mod_webapp for apache 1.3.26. I grabbed webapp and
> apr from cvs.apache.org. it seems to build
Same for me. The "native one" works. Try follow the instructions at:
http://www.eyesbeyond.com/freebsddom/java/jdk13.html
- Punky
>
> TC runs well on the FreeBSD I have access to:
> +++
> bash-2.04$ uname -a
> FreeBSD deejai2.mch.fsc.net 4.6-RC FreeBSD 4.6-RC #4: Thu May 30
> 00:09:26 CEST
Guys,
I got 302 status in requesting the following URL:
1. http://punknix.homeip.net/examples/servlets/
but this one is ok:
2. http://punknix.homeip.net:8080/examples/servlets/
Can you see the difference? Why the first one doesn't work (I mean, the
page does not forward?) Then I go into a
Pier,
>
> All those new things in "configure" have been tested only on MacOS/X, if
> someone gets around to do it before tomorrow evening, I'd like to know if I
> screwed up something on the other systems (J.F., Henri, Punky... Can you
> just run "./configure" with the new options? Make sure you
>
>
>My priorities are kinda right... Get laid off by Sun in november, go on a
>long vacation in December (basically trying to get all my stuff toghether),
>find a new job in January, and start working on February...
>
>Sorry...
>
It's ok. ;-)
>No, I didn't, but I'm sure that my inbox will start
+1 for the patch
-Punky
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Urg, I'm stupid some days :
>>
>>for mod_webapp
>>
>>#define WA_MODULE_BASEVENDOR "Apache Software Foundation"
>>#define WA_MODULE_NAME "mod_webapp"
>>#define WA_MODULE_BASEREVISION "1.2.0-d
>
> That still doesn't change the fact that whatever is in JK for versioning is
> utterly complicated, is completely different from what the Apache folks have
> done so far (look at both 1.3 and 2.0 trees), and I don't want to look up at
> a manual on how to interpret the va_version.h header ever
> Well, it seriously look ugly though... Ok, I admit it might be a PITA cuz in
> Windows we can't simply do a `cat VERSION` and get that number in somewhere,
> but boy that wa_version header looks ugly...
I admited that it is ugly. See below.
>
> Just the fact that we somehow have an "area to
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>>Punky, I appreciate your effort, but IMO, wa_version.h is way
>>too utterly
>>complicated. I'd add -DWEBAPP_VERSION="x" to CFLAGS from
>>the autoconf
>>magicness, and go from there...
>
>
> Hum, I just commited wa_version.h and it's really similar to
> what Jean-Frede
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "Punky Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I had been make this patch for a very long time (3/4/5 months). And
>>send to this list several times... If you like, just grap my patch and
>>comit.
>>
>>(wa_version.h
Henri,
>
> What about reporting webapp version at init time,
>
> [Thu May 02 21:44:38 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.35 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.35OpenSSL/0.9.6
>DAV/2 mod_jk/1.2.0 configured -- resuming normal operations
>
>
> could be
>
> [Thu May 02 21:44:38 2002] [notice
]
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Punky Tse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent
Pier,
You have done a very good job. After your "renovation" work, it
compiles and runs on FreeBSD without error. Bravo!! \^o^/
Cheers,
Punky.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Autoconf is _only_ required when building straight out of CVS, you can
>
Henri,
I have no problem in my linux box. My conf:
===
ServerName punknix.homeip.net:80
#LoadModule webapp_module modules/mod_webapp.so
LoadModule webapp_module modules/libwebapp.so
WebAppConnection conn warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples conn /example
Pier,
Thanks! Before that, I would just like to send you some patches on 2.0
side. But you are faster than me. And it builds prefectly on my Linux
box now.
Questions and Comments:
- I notice that the mod_webapp module name changed from mod_webapp.so to
libwebapp.so. (I spent some time to
Rempy,
> * New Coyote HTTP/1.1 connector
Do you plan to replace the old HTTP connector and set it as default? +1 for
this.
> Comments ?
>
> Remy
Punky
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
> Has anyone successfully been able to connect Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 4.0.
>
> The webapp interface has the following error when loading Apache:
> Cannot load /apache2/modules/mod_webapp.so into server: ld.so.1:
> /cdldevel2/loy/apache2/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
> /cdldevel2/loy/ap
> >
> > Pier,
> > Yeah.. You are correct. This guy replied privately to me that
mod_webapp is
> > now working on his box after he build the source from CVS.
> >
> > For the pre-built binary, shouldn't we provide two sets of binaries (1.3
and
> > 2.0), or just remove the them from the site?
>
> B
> >> [root@bicaweb_dev webapps]# $APACHE_HOME/bin/apachectl start
> >> Syntax error on line 220 of /opt/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
> >> Cannot load /opt/apache2/modules/mod_webapp.so into server:
> >> /opt/apache2/modules
> >> /mod_webapp.so: undefined symbol: ap_table_get
> >> /opt/apache2/bin/apa
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
>
> > I've defined HAVE_UNIXSOCKETS, and i'm making the ifdefs with that it
> > seems to me a little better, i think that not having unix sockets ( at
> > least with that name :) maybe is more common than only win32?..
>
> That's fine. The goal is
>
> Thanks for your quick response. I'm glad to hear you got it running. That
> certainly gives hope!
>
You are welcome. ;-)
> I've tried mod_webapp and mod_jk and get the same error for each. I
> downloaded:
> - jakarta-tomcat-4.0.3.tar
> - mod_webapp.so (downloaded the binary)
>
I buil
> I don't know if this is a bug or something I am doing wrong, but I've
> contacted several people via the Tomcat forums and found that two of them
> had abandoned Apache 2.0 and went back to 1.3 because they could not get
> this to work.
>
> Environment:
> - Redhat Linux 7.1
> - Apache 2.0
> -
> It DOESN'T... Before, all constants were defined in Constants.java, and the
> pr_warp_defs.h was generated from it, so that with each build we were sure
> that the WARP definitions were correct, and if something did went wrong,
> simply the baby wouldn't have built...
I support pr_warp_defs.h b
> >>
> >>I recalled that lib/pr_warp_defs.h was failed to be generated when
> >>Constant.java had been moved.
> >>
> >>See the diff:
>
>>http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/lib/Makefil
e.
> >>in.diff?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&diff_format=h
> >
> >
> > If someone would have cared t
>
> The problem described is a compilation problem and isn't related to to the
make install. I had this problem when I tried to compile the source after
downloading it a while ago. The problem is caused by the constants TYPE_...
not being defined anywhere in the source. To solve this problem I
Glenn,
>
> It can be viewed at:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/bugreport.html
>
> Please review it and make suggestions for improvements.
>
How about add links for a list of opened bug list (both TC3 & 4)?
This one is for TC4:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCON
make install? I don't run it. I manually copy mod_webapp.so from
apache-1.3/.libs to libexec directory. README.txt should have all
information you need.
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Noaman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 9:18 PM
S
How about create a new doc titled "Tunning/Troubleshooting" and add to
Tomcat doc?
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 AM
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnect
Erik,
Final call: Can send the followings in this list?
1. OS and Apache version
2. complete step and arguments to run configure scripts in "httpd" and
"mod_webapp"
3. complete httpd.conf
4. httpd -l
5. httpd -V
I will try to repeat your steps.
Regards,
Punky
- Original Message -
Fro
Erik,
Have you set "ServerName" directive? Or any "" defined?
Regards,
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Lotspeich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: Problems with mod_webapp. Please read!
Erik,
I have similar config. But I have no problem for it. Did you run
"apachectl configtest" to prove your config is correct?
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Lotspeich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 6:18
sage -
From: "Donna Molinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Punky Tse'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Donna
Molinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:15 AM
Subject:
ch problem.
Regards,
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Donna Molinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Punky Tse'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Donna Molinari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tomcat Developers
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This line is wrong:
WebAppDeploy /web/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/examples warpConnection
/examples
/web/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/examples is not a web application name. It
is a file location. Instead,
WebAppDeploy examples warpConnection /examples
should work.
see the description
JF,
It works! Thanks.
And last time I said I will submit mod_webapp version patch for apache-1.3.
It is now ready, together with the one for apache-2.0. Please review.
Punky
--- jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Done, please test
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-frederic
>
I get the lastest cvs snapshot and get the following error
---8<-
Finishing up
checking for APR compilation flags... ok
checking for Makefile targets... lib apache-2.0
creating ./config.status
creating ./Makefile
creating ./Makedefs
creating ./lib/M
Something like you haven't defined ServerName directive. It is required for
mod_webapp for some reasons.
Can you show me the httpd.conf?
- Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Lotspeich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:39 AM
Subject: Pr
Hi,
I now resend the patch to report mod_webapp version.
The new file "wa_version.h" should be placed under "include/" directory.
However, it is for httpd-2.0 only. I will make another patch for 1.3 once
my patch is accepted.
JF, could you please take a look on this patch?
You can see what's
e
this one.
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Patch] add version information to mod_webapp in Server Header
>
Hi,
I have added server version information of mod_webapp for httpd-2.0. Please
take a look to the patches. I have modified mod_webapp.c and added a new
file wa_version.h. wa_version.h should be placed under
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/include.
By adding this patch, httpd-2.0 will retur
> AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
> will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and unlikely to
> change, except bugfixes.
>
> Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
> the current set of modules. Even if there ar
Minor patch, I think it is just a typo error
Punky
__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
build.properties.sample.patch
>
> The current build system has gotten to be a mess (again) in the last few
> months.
>
Jon,
I worked very hard every few days in this month to make my TC4 built
successfully May be I was the one who found more frustrated than you.
Although I see that there are active changes to the build sy
Reme,
Thank you for commiting the patch. And it works now.
One other thing is that I need to have xalan.jar inclued in my classpath so
that the tomcat-doc target can be built sucessfully. I read from
BUILDING.txt that the xalan.jar is not a prerequsite but just a
recommendation to have it set.
Seems like only need this should work
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/examples/build.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 build.xml
20,21c20,21
<
<
---
>
>
--- [EMAIL P
> >
> > P.S. What hacker I mean is: The one who read the source code and make
> > change to it so that the whole system get benefit from it. So you are
> > hacker. (but me not yet). The guy who break the system is
> > cracker, or black
> > hacker to be specific.
> ??? A cracker is a criminal
> >2) How about moving Developing Interceptors, Valves and Connectors, and
> >Using Tomcat Utility Classes to a seperate Developer Guide?
> >They are only
> >useful for real hackers.
>
> Don't forget what make Apache HTTP server so successfull.
> The number of modules built for Apache 1.2/1.3 AP
> > 3) How about putting all the installation and configuration of Tomcat
> > standalone first, and then followed by some chapters (advanced topics)
about
> > Running Tomcat behind web servers?
>
>
> It's already organized that way. See the first paragraph of the
> "editorial notes:"
> >>I think
> First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
> like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
> steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
> quick-and-dirty "impatient" install is available to the people who can
Alex,
Please see my comment below:
1) The details of the TOC looks better than my version.
2) How about moving Developing Interceptors, Valves and Connectors, and
Using Tomcat Utility Classes to a seperate Developer Guide? They are only
useful for real hackers.
3) How about putting all the in
>
> "Developer" in the sense of this sentence is a Tomcat
> developer. "User" is the people that just want to download, install,
> configure, and utilize Tomcat as a servlet container.
>
Agree. That's why I suggested that we need to separate Developer Guide from
User/Administrator Guide. I be
Rob,
Please see below for rephrased version of Introduction and Administrator
Guide.
>
> 0) Introduction
>
>- Why use tomcat, what does it do and what doesn't it do?
>- Feature list as from tomcat 3 and as from tomcat 4 (group together
> features and in which versions they appear/
See comments below.
> And currently when you update documentation, you could have
> 2 or 3 branchs to updates (TC 3.2, 3.3, 4.0).
>
> But there is many common areas (realms, connectors) and
> we should avoid such duplication effort...
>
> What about starting a jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project, whe
>
> You should just be able to override "tomcat.build" and
> "tomcat.dist" properties in your local build.properties file. One of the
> advantages of the build.properties approach is that you can override *any*
> property definition in Ant, not just the ones that were passed from the
> build.sh o
> #1. I have been able to compile Tomcat 4 for the FIRST time in about 6
> months without a lot of painful work. Woo hoo!
>
Agree. I have the same experience before. But a few days ago I tried
again, I did it. How amazing. Thanks a lot, guys.
Now my only complain for building TC4 from cvs is
APR is not a feature of Apache 2.0, but a library/shared object/DLL that
Apache 2.0 makes use to. It provides a bundle of functions like file I/O,
sockets, IPC, threading, etc. While the API is in C, it is portable to
almost all platforms, even the oddest OS/2 and BeOS.
In C world, it is a ver
And I think it is also good to state in the mail-announcement and in the
jakarta website that the b2 have such security vulnerability when b3 is
rolled out.
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001
Henri,
To see if APR could run on AS/400, you just need to download the
Apache2.0alpha drop and build it. If the httpd could run properly than APR
works on AS/400!
Have fun!
Punky
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday
> >
> > IBM JDK:
> > java version "1.3.0"
> > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> > 1.3.0)
> > Classic VM (build 1.3.0, J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build
> > cx130-20001124 (JIT enabled:
> > jitc))
> >
> > brien
It's not Tomcat's problem. It is your JDK's problem. It is a know issue fo
> Let's say, webapp needs to use 10% of APR, but that 10% represents 90% of
> its complexity (shmem, mutexes, I/O)... Even if it's not final when Tomcat
4
> goes final, that shouldn't prevent us from using it... It's a good
library,
> and why doing ourselves what others are already doing (and are
> Are you volunteering to help do that? :-) If so, that would be great.
>
> Craig McClanahan
>
But I don't know the underlying architecture of mod_webapp. How is it
different from mod_jk? Is it not using the ajp protocol? And can you give
me some pointers?
(plesase don't point me to
http://
>
> Oh, let me see... APR can't be built as static library? (i.e. libapr.a).
If
> it can be built as static library, we don't create a new problem to the
> user. But obviously, the work has shifted to the one who build mod_webapp
> (Sam or Pier?), and of course the developer have to know how to b
- Original Message -
From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: mod_webapp status?
> >
> > I agree and that's the main advantage of APR. But you'll see on
>
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 6:21 AM
Subject: RE: mod_webapp status?
> >> I'm rewriting it using APR... As we speak...
> >>
> >> Pier (under the snow in Dublin)
> >>
> >
>
> APR is a great piece of
e below.
Punky
==
$ telnet localhost 8080
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to ws-punky-tse.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD /index.html HTTP/1.0
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 2572
Last-Modified: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12
Hi guys,
I read from some threads that Costin mentioned that 3.3 is a refactoring
of 3.2 code. Here I found an article about Refactoring:
http://www.sdmagazine.com/articles/2000/0012/0012b/0012b.htm
Enjoy!
Merry X'mas
Punky
Hi,
Craig and Pier: Let's fix it! We have a beautiful build tool (Ant) ,
why can't we have a good build system?
My build scripts for 3.2 and 3.3 runs great. So, I try to write build
script for TC4. But I failed. Like Jon, I found that it is too hard to
build.
Still, I haven't tr
70 matches
Mail list logo
