[IGNORE] Re: setURLStreamHandlerFactory--why?

2001-04-24 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Kyle F. Downey wrote: > Remy, > > Do you happen to know if the patch I submitted for the context > ClassLoader was ever inspected or merged in? I never saw a reply. > Sorry, this was a personal reply not meant for the list. --kd

Re: setURLStreamHandlerFactory--why?

2001-04-24 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Remy, Do you happen to know if the patch I submitted for the context ClassLoader was ever inspected or merged in? I never saw a reply. --kd

Re: Solaris Sparc Performance Problem

2001-04-23 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Anne Dirkse wrote: > Douglas -- > > I am experiencing the exact same set of problems, except that I'm just > beginning to experience them, so I haven't done any real testing to get > to the specifics of what is going on and the exact performance > difference that I am experiencing between Solari

[PATCH] context ClassLoader not set before init(ServletConfig)

2001-04-19 Thread Kyle F. Downey
I think there's another place the context ClassLoader should be set: right before init(ServletConfig) is called. Attached is a patch that sets the current Thread's ContextClassLoader and then to the servlet context's ClassLoader and restores it after init() completes. This ensures that the webapp

setURLStreamHandlerFactory--why?

2001-04-18 Thread Kyle F. Downey
I'm working with the latest b4-dev from CVS. Is there a reason the StandardLoader establishes a URLStreamHandlerFactory (a precious resource, since you can set it only once) just for the "jndi:" protocol? If all it's used for is to find the protocol handler, that could be done less intrusively b

Re: An alternative to JSP

2001-01-11 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Right on. HTML-in-Java vs. Java-in-HTML is a silly argument AFAIK. Neither's a very good solution long-term. The Java-in-HTML makes it near-impossible for designers to collaborate with coders, while the HTML-in-Java has that problem, plus the code bloat problem (the bytecode format will choke on

RE: search engine?

2001-01-03 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Whoops, thanks for the correction! --kd > I just found this under > > http://www.lucene.com/ > > - Paul > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kyle F. Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 9:55 AM > > To:

Re: search engine?

2001-01-03 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Try http://www.lucene.org. Open source full-text search engine. --kd > Hi, > > Does tomcat-apache provide site search functionality? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

2000-12-27 Thread Kyle F. Downey
> > Since I'm in your "tinkerer" group because I'm following the Catalina path > (like we agreed on), I will state that everything in your "conservative" > group is just as important to me in the "tinkerer" group. > > Therefore, your distinct separation of the groups is illogical and moot. > Not

Re: realm always checked?

2000-12-27 Thread Kyle F. Downey
> > If you are in a session, the authenticated principal is actually cached (in a > private variable inside the Session object). If you are not in a session, Catalina > has no choice but to authenticate you every time, because it has no way to know > that the second request came from the same per

TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor

2000-12-27 Thread Kyle F. Downey
I've been following of the TC4.0/TC3.2/TC3.3 threads for a while in silence, and wanted to make an observation. The Tomcat project really has two major types of customers: those who want an open source servlet container for their production needs ("conservatives"), and those interested in the st

realm always checked?

2000-12-27 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Quick question: why does Catalina check with the Realm implementation on every HTTP request, even after a successful authentication? Is it the responsibility of the Realm to handle caching and expiring of credentials? Seems to me that would lead to a good bit of replication of code among Realm im

Re: *beaten and battered*: JAASRealm works!

2000-12-19 Thread Kyle F. Downey
As promised, here's the code, plus docs, build.xml, etc.. http://www.amberarcher.com/apache/tomcat_contrib/tomcat_contrib-0.1.zip Feedback welcome. I probably won't be able to get up HTML docs to supplement the text docs in the package until after Xmas. I'll set up the "tomcat_contrib" project

*beaten and battered*: JAASRealm works!

2000-12-19 Thread Kyle F. Downey
Okay, after a full day's work, I have a working JAASRealm that lets you use a JAAS LoginModule (or many LoginModules) for authenticating Web clients. My company's KerberosLoginModule now happily authenticates a user against our Kerberos 5 KDC from inside Catalina. Jazzy. This is JDK 1.3-only cod