Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ?
>
+1 for the postponement(sp?)
Also, +1 for 5.5.12 (Sol8 and Suse 9.2)
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
d up by a
> better understandable overal lb design. I expect, that we will find the
> need for bigger changes to lb.
>
+1
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"If you c
Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >
> > 3. Lists
> >c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
Last I looked, there were more people on the committers list
than those who are actually on the PMC, iirc.
--
========
On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote:
We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new
workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for "Busyness", and
updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any
feedback or suggestions from the mailing list
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>
> [X] Stable -- good build
> [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it?
>
Testing so far is positive.
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://
use them
as a guide.
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
llect and tally votes
(I propose Henri Yandell)
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"There 10 types of people: those who read bina
On Mar 23, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The PMC Chair has "ultimate" authority, since the position is board
appointed and results in the Chair being a VP of the ASF. There's
no precedent for "sharing" the role or having a "co-Chair.&q
normal
committer, no more, no less.
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
ch an ASF weenie and
understand and embrace the Apache Way... It can be a
"political" and "managerial" kind of position and any candidate
should realize that sad fact :/
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL P
Costin Manolache wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I would agree if people did not think I deserved PMC
> > member status. I would be honored to accept, but would 100% understand
> > if there were, well... thoughts that it was unwarranted :)
>
> I
>
True, but the proposal should specify the Chair that has been
voted on my the pre-PMC. The board usually appoints the person
that the PMC has "chosen"
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]
s. I would be honored to accept, but would 100% understand
if there were, well... thoughts that it was unwarranted :)
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"
Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> +1 for both of all.
>
> Should I understand they will works more on HTTPD related stuff and of
> course JK ?-)
>
Yep, that's my intent :)
--
=======
Jim Jagielski
jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > I'd like to request commit privs for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors
> > tree. I will be working mostly on the apache/mod_jk
> > integration aspects to complement what is going on
> > in the httpd mod_proxy
I'd like to request commit privs for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors
tree. I will be working mostly on the apache/mod_jk
integration aspects to complement what is going on
in the httpd mod_proxy side.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > There's been talk, at least on the HTTPD side of things, to
> > have the balancer mechanism be open to external weighting
> > methods (for the httpd proxy module)... But it's only
> > gone so far
the balancer mechanism be open to external weighting
methods (for the httpd proxy module)... But it's only
gone so far as "it sure would be nice."
--
=======
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http:/
On Feb 5, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
1) Eclipse support (nobody has mentioned a different IDE yet)
http://subclipse.tigris.org/
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"
> >>
> >>What's your opinions on moving Tomcat as top level project ?
> >>
+1... If you want reasons/opinions, I can offer them. :)
--
===========
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]
At 10:42 AM -0800 1/10/03, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> >
>> > Glenn Olander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > 5) The strength of the PRNG is largely irrelevant
>> >
bers
between 1 and 1,000,000 you will, after a point in time, have
duplicate numbers. In fact, all will be duplicated over some time.
Valid and "trusted" session ids should be random and unique at the
same time. PRNG takes care of one aspect.
--
=========
't included. Did you build with support
for DSOs (for Apache)?
--
===========
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little
23 matches
Mail list logo
