! (please recompile it with -DEAPI)
Well, I didn't compile it, so I can't recompile it.
I expect that a number of other users will be in the same boat.
Is there any compelling reason not to build with -DEAPI?
What will really happen if this mod_webapp.so is used?
--
Eryq
a so that we can keep track of what was
> found faulty and when it was fixed, I know, it's a big pain in the ass,
> but... :) :) :)
Not a problem. I classified the bug as UNCONFIRMED and voted
once for it. Hope that was the right thing to do.
Eryq
them off in your browser, or
by disabling them in the context, or both.
Thanks in advance,
--
Eryq, http://www.zeegee.com/eryq
WANTED: Schrodinger's Cat. Dead and/or Alive.
olaris 5.8
with mod_webapp.
5. After the 3rd recompile, "rm -rf" and start over.
You never know what garbage is lying around
that "make distclean" didn't get rid of.
Perhaps some of these advicelets are unnecessary,
but the combination worked for me.
Thanks to all who helped.
Eryq
mod_webapp.so binary for Solaris 5.8
available, built against apache 1.3.20 and dld?
Sorry to whine. I'm an open-source distributor myself
(http://www.zeegee.com/code/perl), so I'm appreciative
of the thankless tasks y'all have. I'd like to help you ferret
out t
nf and server.xml.
Ideas? TIA,
--
Eryq, http://www.zeegee.com/eryq
WANTED: Schrodinger's Cat. Dead and/or Alive.
, but:
WebAppInfo /server-status-webapp/
gives me an "Invalid virtual host name".
What do I do now?
Thanks,
--
Eryq, http://www.zeegee.com/eryq
WANTED: Schrodinger's Cat. Dead and/or Alive.
