Re: (movie)

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (the list manager says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed) Is it subscribed to the -allow list? and related info on that page may help. That was indee

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat failed

Quoting Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Project: jakarta-tomcat > State: Failed > URL: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat.html > - G U M P Y Please remove whatever configuration settings are implying to Gump or

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2 failed

Quoting Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Project: jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2 > State: Failed > URL: > http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2.html > - G U M P Y > Please remove whatever configura

Re: Jakarta Collections 3.0?

Quoting Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If I remember correctly ( and if it didn't change ), tomcat needs > modeler in a parent classloader. Modeler has an optional dependency on > digester, which depends on beanutils and collections. They both depend > on logging, and modeler also depe

Re: Test [was: Re: The Mailing List Parrot.]

Quoting "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting NormW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Good morning All. > > There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send > > gets echoed (good), along with two others from

Test [was: Re: The Mailing List Parrot.]

Quoting NormW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Good morning All. > There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send > gets echoed (good), along with two others from xAT.sci.de with the same > topic field but reporting undelivered messages (bad). Since this effect only > occurs of

Re: Using Struts in Tomcat

Quoting geek J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How to and where to place Struts 1.1 package in Tomcat If I need to work on > Struts framework using JSP.? Do I need to configure anything more in my > classpath to work struts.? Do I need any app developer seperately.? You should plan including struts.jar

Re: Tomcat sessions at ApacheCon

Quoting Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Performance and optimization (Glenn) > * JSP 2.0 (Mark Roth) - well, not really about TC > * Jasper from TC 5 (Kin-Man) > * TC 5 new features (JF + Craig) - Craig has had nothing to do with TC > for a while, I wonder what he'll be talking about Bas

Re: [5.0] Property replacement

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I'd like to make a small proposal to do property replacement. Included are changes that should be made in the digester, and that I'll post on commons-dev if I have approval. - Add a get/setProperty to Container. This would allow a property inheritance across containe

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to T

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

Henri Gomez wrote: I traced TC 5.0 and Digester and suspect what could be the problem with external entities when only SYTEM is defined ie : In Digester.java, at least in the 1.5 release, resolveEntity return null if publicId is null even if systemId is set. To make it works, I just replaced :

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

Henri Gomez wrote: CF w3c.org ... relative URIs are relative to the location of the resource within which the entity declaration occurs. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-external-ent As long as Tomcat uses the Digester.parse() entry point that takes an InputSource, and properly specifies the s

Re: Logging filter (was RE: [next] What's next ?)

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, --- "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. Convert AccessLogValve to be a servlet specification 2.3 filter, i.e. That sounds wonderful and useful, but there are a few problems here. Filters don't have access to all the information that is needed

Re: Logging filter (was RE: [next] What's next ?)

joe user wrote: --- "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. Convert AccessLogValve to be a servlet specification 2.3 filter, i.e. something portable. We can define it in $CATALINA_HOME/conf/web.xml, commented out by default perhaps, and users can move the definition around as they need

Re: [next] What's next ?

Henri Gomez wrote: Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : 3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have the jvmRoute mechanism, but I th

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup CatalinaProperties.java

Remy Maucherat wrote: Jan Luehe wrote: good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader hierachy/depth is different from that in Tomcat? I honestly don't understand why we're searching parent classloaders for TLDs.

Re: Do not email me. Remove me.

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, www.cmttrading.com wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:01:27 -0700 > From: www.cmttrading.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Do not email me. Remove me. > > Do not email me.

Re: [5.0] Planning

On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:48:52 +0200 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [5.0] Planning > > Shapira, Yoav wrote: > > Howdy, > >

Re: [5.0] Listeners change

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:29:09 +0200 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [5.0] Listeners change > > Right now, all the webapp event

Re: Validation of the server.xml

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Yoko Kamei Harada wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:23:23 +0900 (JST) > From: Yoko Kamei Harada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Validation of the server.xml >

Re: Validation of the server.xml

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sabine Winkler wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:15:46 +0200 > From: Sabine Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Validation of the server.xml > > hi there, > > may be, t

Re: [5.0] Tester

On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:30:35 +0200 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [5.0] Tester > > I have put the tester back in activity

Re: How to get the container within an instance event?

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Angus Mezick wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:08:33 -0400 > From: Angus Mezick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to get the container within an instance event? > > Does anyone

Re: Patches for catalina.sh

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ronald Klop wrote: > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:29:49 +0200 > From: Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Patches for catalina.sh > > And while your at it can you

RE: [5.0] Commons dependencies

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:05:22 -0400 > From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [5.0] Commons dependencies > > > Howdy, > > >>>- mode

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realmRealmBase.java

On Wed, 28 May 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 00:13:31 +0200 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/

RE: Http version error

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Sean Reilly wrote: > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:14:06 -0600 > From: Sean Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Http version error > > Unless you formatted the email str

Re: Filter access to response object [was Re: domain-wide sessioncookies?]

ject [was Re: domain-wide session > cookies?] > > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:10:59 -0800 (PST), "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> said: > > Sharing a session across virtual hosts violates the Servlet spec > > (Section 7.3 - "HttpSession objec

Re: domain-wide session cookies?

gt; > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:44:04 -0800 (PST), "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> said: > > Under Tomcat-4 it looks like the session cookie is set in: > >> > > org/apache/catalina/connector/HttpResponseBase.java > >>

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Extra web.xml to declare compiled JSPs

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:05:26 +0100 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Extra web.xml to declare compiled JSPs

Re: domain-wide session cookies?

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Aditya wrote: > Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:40:20 -0800 > From: Aditya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: domain-wide session cookies? > > Under Tomcat-4 it looks like the session cookie is set in: > >

RE: Tomcat-user

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Mladen Turk wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:45:05 +0100 > From: Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat-user > > > > > -Or

Re: Request to Fix Tomcat Standalone 302 redirect Issue

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:44:16 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Request to Fix Tomcat Standalone 302 redirect Issue > > T

Re: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, such asSQL Queries, are still active!

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Tim Funk wrote: > > Why is a kill done instead of a System.exit()? System.exit() is absolutely the wrong answer if Tomcat is embedded into a larger server-side application, rather than run separately in the usual way. At best, you would need to make this configurable someh

RE: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, such as SQL Queries, are still active!

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Jindong Li wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:53:52 -0500 > From: Jindong Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, >

RE: Need review -- WIN32 procrun

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Access denied: Insufficient Karma > (mturk|jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/) Fixed -- this should work for you now. Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: help for a realm author

On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Tony Dahbura wrote: > Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:56:01 -0500 > From: Tony Dahbura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: help for a realm author > > Team: > When tomcat is configure

Re: authentication and filters

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:52:57 -0500 (EST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: authentication and filters > > > I have narrowed down my pro

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeansMBeanUtils.java

On 28 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 28 Jan 2003 05:29:22 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans > MBeanUtils.

Re: Cleanup of javax.servlet.context.tempdir

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:11:29 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Cleanup of javax.servlet.co

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasperJspC.java

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Hans Bergsten wrote: > Again, I'm only talking about JSPC here; I'm not arguing for removing > the package name that JspServlet adds. > >From a usability perspective, having JSPC work differently (in this regard) from runtime compilation doesn't seem like a good idea. A pa

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasperJspC.java

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Hans Bergsten wrote: > > See my previous mail; you do _not_ need to have a package statement > for the generated servlet class. Adding it just complicates life. > There is a situation when *not* having the package statement can cause big problems for users. The JSP spec do

RE: Valve question

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Filip Hanik wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:13:16 -0800 > From: Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Valve question > > what places can I define in? You mea

Re: Valve question

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Filip Hanik wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:00:13 -0800 > From: Filip Hanik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Valve question > > hi, > is it possible from the valve to get

Re: Strange Cookie behavior with ie 6 and subdomains

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michael Wyraz wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:00:45 +0100 > From: Michael Wyraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Strange Cookie behavior with ie 6 and subdomains > >

Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common*

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Aditya wrote: > Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:36:58 -0800 > From: Aditya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common* > > > On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 19:37:2

Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common*

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 19:37:28 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common* > > Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: > > > For w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat doc organization

On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:35:12 -0600 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat doc organization > > If you follow the tomcat-user list there are

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

r-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report > > On 1/2/2003 at 9:23 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > >> Nonetheless, I think the patched behavior is much more correct than the > >> current behavior and should be applied to cvs. > >> > > &g

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk workershowto.xml

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 09:23:49 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk > workershowto.xml

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500 > From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:02:09 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool > > Craig R.

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > > >> As for someone stoping the check for class modification at run time using > >> an admin interface - what's wrong with that ? > > > > I don't see a problem with that, but I've stopped using "reloadable" at > > all for my development -- reload-on

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:00:57 -0500 > From: Joseph Shraibman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: T

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > > Michael wrote: > > > Costin Manolache wrote: [snips] > >> IMO MonitorRunnable, the session expiration thread ( one per ctx ) > >> and the reloading thread ( one per ctx again ) > > > > What classes are you referring to specifically? StandardMa

Re: [PROPOSAL] EL Transition to Jakarta Commons

+1, but you'll probably also want to post this on COMMONS-DEV :-). Craig On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jan Luehe wrote: > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:48:34 -0800 (PST) > From: Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [E

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat modules

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Ok, so to paraphrase: > - Catalina core: stays in j-t-catalina/catalina > - Modules which use the Catalina API: j-t-catalina/modules (or by > component name, like j-t-catalina/cluster ?) Or maybe j-t-catalina/modules/cluster so that the individual m

Re: [VOTE] Making JMX required in tomcat5

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:22:18 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Making JMX required in tomcat5 > > The subject should be clear. The be

Re: Strange Tomcat 4.1.x release versions

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:29:54 -0800 > From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Project Management Committee List > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List

Re: CreateContext Error using Tomcat Admin

PLEASE do not cross-post messages to both TOMCAT-DEV and TOMCAT-USER. Your series of questions have been user related, and are appropriate on TOMCAT-USER. They are not appropriate on TOMCAT-DEV, which is about the development of Tomcat itself. Craig On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Laxmikanth M.S. wrote: >

Re: Tomcat App. Dev. Guide

On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:22:47 +1100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tomcat App. Dev. G

Re: Filter in Tomcat 3.3.1

Please do not cross-post questions on both the DEV and USER lists. In particular, this is a USER list sort of question. On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Laxmikanth M.S. wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:49:09 +0530 > From: Laxmikanth M.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [5] [Proposal] Adding an authorization interface

On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: > I would like to create a new interface called Authorizator(and a default > AuthorizatorBase) that will take care of those methods. I'd be a lot more willing to buy in to Authorizer and AuthorizerBase :-). The initial Realm design definitely com

Re: Tomcat 5.0: Source Code

On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, micael wrote: > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:30:50 -0800 > From: micael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat 5.0: Source Code > > Okay, taking a chance on public humiliation here. Nah, that'd be me

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

't really bother in when used sparsely, but with hunderds of >JSP, it gets a bit gruesome as time goes on and pages change. > > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One textual approach to minimizing the extra ne

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Lin wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:52 -0800 (PST) > From: Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization > > > > I sent

Re: Why can I not use attributes "lang" and "maxRows" in a customtag

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Paul Speed wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:50:34 -0500 > From: Paul Speed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Why can I not use attributes "lang" and "maxRows" in a >

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Lin wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:36:50 -0800 (PST) > From: Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization > > > So it w

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Romianowski wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:05:29 +0100 > From: Peter Romianowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization >

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Romianowski wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:22:15 +0100 > From: Peter Romianowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization >

Re: Why can I not use attributes "lang" and "maxRows" in a customtag

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Jim Cobban wrote: > Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:17:50 -0500 > From: Jim Cobban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Jim Cobban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jan Luehe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why can I

Re: Authenticator Documentation

tion > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:47 PM > Subject: Re: Authenticator Documentation > > > &g

Re: Authenticator Documentation

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > During initialization of a new webapp, Catalina uses the value of the > (which should be BASIC, DIGEST, FORM, or CLIENT-CERT) It probably would have been useful to say that the is found in the "/WEB-INF/web.xml" deployment de

Re: Authenticator Documentation

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:08:36 -0800 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Authenticator Documentation > > Browsing the documentation fo

Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper

On 14 Nov 2002, Paul Hunnisett wrote: > Date: 14 Nov 2002 20:05:07 + > From: Paul Hunnisett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper > > Thanks Craig, I'll take a look

Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Algirdas P. Veitas wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:04:36 -0700 > From: Algirdas P. Veitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based auth

Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper

On 12 Nov 2002, Paul Hunnisett wrote: > Date: 12 Nov 2002 19:38:18 + > From: Paul Hunnisett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper > > Thanks Dan, I'll try that. Ba

Re: [4.1.15] Tag tomorrow

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:01:49 +0100 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [4.1.15] Tag tomorrow > > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >

Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication

See below. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Algirdas P. Veitas wrote: > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:56:46 -0700 > From: Algirdas P. Veitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication > > Folk

Re: [Q] How to merge 2 web.xml files?

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:07:15 - > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Q] How t

Re: [VOTE] Proposed jspc refactoring

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: > Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:43:45 +0100 > From: Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed jspc refactoring > > Remy Maucherat wrote:

Re: Possible bug in RequestDispatcher?

In Servlet 2.3 (i.e. Tomcat 4.x), filters are *not* invoked on request dispatcher calls -- only on the original request. In Servlet 2.4 (i.e. Tomcat 5.x) you can optionally configure which filters should be used on forwards, includes, or both, with suitable settings in web.xml. Craig On Mon, 4 N

Re: tomcat4 user guide ( doc on webapps/ dir ) ?

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 11:39:12 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: tomcat4 user guide ( doc on webapps/ dir ) ? > > Hi, > > Is there any documen

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resourcesLocalStrings_fr.properties

On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: > De toute petite corrections ;-) ... ah ces Quebbecois! Is this going to be as bad as American versus British English speakers? :-) > > -- Jeanfrancois > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: WEB.XML not reloaded???

On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:33:43 -0500 > From: Glenn Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: WEB.XML not reloaded??? > > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >

Re: Form Based Authentication, getting login and password

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Externo wrote: > > Hello, I didn't get a response to this question on tomcat-user > so I'll give it a try here. Sorry, I write you as a last resort. Apparently, > nobody know about this. > The username is available (if you successfully logged in) via request.getRemoteUser(

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4CoyoteConnector.java

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:29:51 -0700 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:10:03 +0200 > From: Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 > > > If this refer

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: > Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:13:10 +0200 > From: Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 > > > > Haven't look

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: > Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:39:00 +0200 > From: Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 > > Remy Maucherat w

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:30:47 -0700 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution > > iasandcb wrote: > > > Fi

Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last Assurance

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, micael wrote: > Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:12:20 -0700 > From: micael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last > As

Re: THE SOURCE, LUKE: JBoss/Tomcat Mystery

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, micael wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:07:58 -0700 > From: micael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: THE SOURCE, LUKE: JBoss/Tomcat Mystery > > Below is the source index.html I am getting when I a

Re: [Volunteer Needed] - TOMCAT-DEV Moderation

eration > >Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > >I would be honoured to serve you in any way I can > >Best Wishes > >Edward Banfa > > > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:I need a volunteer to take over moderation of > >

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11Http11Processor.java

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:06:50 -0700 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/j

[Volunteer Needed] - TOMCAT-DEV Moderation

I need a volunteer to take over moderation of the TOMCAT-DEV mailing list. Basically, this involves replying "yes" or "no" to a message from the mailing list server when non-subscribers attempt to post. Most of this kind of mail falls into the following categories: * Spam * Bug reports from

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 > From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: 4.1.10 tarball is borked. > > Whoever packaged the tar

Re: Contributing patches/enhancements?

On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Eddie Ruvinsky wrote: > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT) > From: Eddie Ruvinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Contributing patches/enhancements? > > > Hello, I have a process question

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina build.xml

On 11 Sep 2002, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Date: 11 Sep 2002 09:58:54 +0200 > From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina build.xml > > On 11 Sep 2002, <[EMAIL PR

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servletJspServletWrapper.java

t; jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet > JspServletWrapper.java > > Kin-Man Chung wrote: > >>Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:41:16 -0700 (PDT) > >>From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: R

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >