Re: jk2 problems with libapr.so

2002-01-22 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:12:29PM +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > I am playing with jk2 and I have noted that the loadNative() in AprImpl fails: > +++ > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > /home/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.1/webapps/jk/WEB-INF/jk2/jni/libapr.so: > /home/jakarta/jakarta-

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

2001-11-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:30:38PM -0500, Matt Goyer wrote: > I've got both binutils and libtool installed. > > How do I get it to use the GNU linker instead? Though 'ld -v' tells me > ld -v 'GNU ld version 2.11.2 (with BFD 2.11.2)' That's a good question. I'm not seeing any relevant flags or pa

Re: Mod_webapp & Solaris 8

2001-11-28 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:08:28AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:31:13PM -0500, mgoyer wrote: > > Httpd was built with gcc-3.0.1 the same version that I'm using for > > mod_webapp. > > Then, just add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0.1/lib to your LDFLAGS for > httpd. There's a t

Re: Problem compiling mod_webapp for IBM HTTP Server 1.9.19 running on AIX 4.3.3. Please help save Tomcat for a high profile project in Switzerland

2001-11-18 Thread Aaron Bannert
y the managementÂ’s desire to >use IBM HTTP Server instead of plain Apache mainly due to IBMÂ’s SSL support, which is >perceived to be more trustworthy and secure. > > > > Is my assumption right? If yes, is there a way I could generate that damn .exp >file for mod_webapp? I

Re: Re: >> Apache/Tomcat Collaboration

2001-10-01 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:10:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > What are the main advantages to using an in-process VM as opposed > > to an out-of-process VM bridged over some form of IPC (like > > mod_webapp/mod_jk/mod_

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/lib wa_config.c

2001-08-21 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 04:24:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > pier01/08/21 09:24:37 > > Modified:webapp/lib wa_config.c > Log: > Allow web-applications to be deployed as root of virtual hosts. > Thanks to Philipp Richter Cool! Would you mind posting a sample config to

Re: mod_webapp

2001-07-18 Thread Aaron Bannert
> > Nope... The official _stable_ WARP code is distributed with Tomcat 4.0, and > > resides in that CVS... The one you download from jakarta-tomcat-connectors > > is the "working copy"... As soon as I tag a "stable" version, that gets > > copied over into the official repository... > > So we will

Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [TomcatDocu mentation Redactors To Hire]

2001-07-08 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 05:11:04PM -0700, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Quoting Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > d) jakarta-tomcat-connectors (* Pier is working on this, I've > > submitted > > Hold it... Pier is working on the new build for the W

Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [TomcatDocu mentation Redactors To Hire]

2001-07-07 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Yes, we obviously need pointers in a top-level README on "where the docs > went". I'm willing to collaborate on these types of docs. On a slight tangent, I'd like to point out that we could use more STATUS and README documents

Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [TomcatDocu mentation Redactors To Hire]

2001-07-06 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:06:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > * Tomcat docs for a particular version should be delivered as one or more > web apps (not necessarily the root webapp as is current practice). That > way, the corresponding WAR files could be dropped into *any* container,

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-07-02 Thread Aaron Bannert
> Hmm, I wonder if we should do a T&R with APR to give a "release" > that is separate from httpd-2.0. I don't see any reason why we > couldn't do this. I just have no clue how to do the T&R. My > understanding is that anyone with commit privs can do that. > I'll look into it though. > > BUT,

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Aaron Bannert
>> would have to offer on this. so close, and yet... > > > > As Pier said, just add ServerName. > > > > Be nice if you took all of this info and submitted a patch for the docs. > > I'd bet someone would commit it. I know Aaron Bannert submitted a patch > &

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 06:35:29PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to > > build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply > > ask them where the tarball is, and then in our configure script, we >

Re: problem with mod_webapp

2001-06-29 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 02:31:50AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > What if (random thoughts coming out now), instead of requiring people to > build APR (since that seems the biggest source of problems), we don't simply > ask them where the tarball is, and then in our configure script, we > confi

[PATCH] Re: [J-T-C] What about ajp13 refactory in java ?

2001-06-20 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:47:23AM +0100, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > Aaron Bannert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:06:07AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > >> Apache Tomcat Connectors > >> ===

Re: [tomcat-dev] [J-T-C] What about ajp13 refactory in java ?

2001-06-20 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 09:41:19AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Aaron Bannert wrote: [snip] > > Apache Tomcat Connectors > > [snip] > > Installing Apa

Re: [tomcat-dev] [J-T-C] What about ajp13 refactory in java ?

2001-06-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:06:07AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > Apache Tomcat Connectors > > > > Introduction > > > This CVS module contains the code for the Tomcat Connectors.

Re: [tomcat-dev] [J-T-C] What about ajp13 refactory in java ?

2001-06-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Gomez Henri wrote: > > I've been lurking on this list for awhile and wading through all the > > code, and this one has been bothering me for awhile. > > Is there a way we could get > > a STATUS and README file written for j-t-c? I would do it myself, but

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_md5.c

2001-06-19 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:55:09PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hgomez 01/06/19 08:55:08 > > Modified:jk/native/common jk_md5.c > Log: > Bug fixes, bad buffer used ! > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.5 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_md5.c

Re: [tomcat-dev] [J-T-C] What about ajp13 refactory in java ?

2001-06-18 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 05:01:59PM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > I'd like to know what's the current status of ajp java on j-t-c. I've been lurking on this list for awhile and wading through all the code, and this one has been bothering me for awhile. Is there a way we could get a STATUS and README