Re: Building Question

CLR ? On Apr 10, 2005 3:33 AM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, > > it's > > a PITA for < 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are > > being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wastin

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

I voted it stable but I'm not using clustering support :( On Apr 9, 2005 8:54 PM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>>Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review > >>>the 5.5.10 codebase. > >>>I also package my fixes to the 5.5

RE: Building Question

Hi, > I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, > it's > a PITA for < 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are > being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many > people > use the source distro :). I've been building with 1.4

Building Question

I'm thinking of starting on implementing CLRs for Tomcat 5.5. However, it's a PITA for < 1.5. I wanted to check that the binary builds for TC 5.5 are being built with JDK 1.5, or, I'm probably wasting my time (not many people use the source distro :). This message is intended only for the u

HELLO

Here are your banks documents. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs changelog.xml

billbarker2005/04/09 12:30:37 Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml Log: Note SSL change, fix typo. Revision ChangesPath 1.284 +9 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml Index: changelog.xml =

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review the 5.5.10 codebase. I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug report.. I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he gets married (congratulations

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs changelog.xml

glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:58 Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt jk/xdocs changelog.xml Log: Document bug fixes Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

glenn 2005/04/09 08:44:35 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: BUG: 34357 Apache 2 JkAutoAlias segfault In some situations Apache 2 mod_jk could segfault when the JkAutoAlias directive is used. Added an additional null pointer test. Revision ChangesPath

RE: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Hi, > > Ok, this give me and Filip time for real stability testing and review > > the 5.5.10 codebase. > > I also package my fixes to the 5.5.9 codebase for some test user as bug > > report.. > > I'll let Yoav decide what he wants to do with all these builds before he > gets married (congratulati

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34357] - Seg Fault in Apache 2 mod_jk.c

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34358] - loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c

glenn 2005/04/09 08:29:14 Modified:jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c Log: BUG: 34358 loadbalance.method=[T]raffic not enbaled The lbworker->lbmethod was not being intialized from the worker.properties config. Fixed bug based on mladen's recommendation. Revision Chan

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/tools/reports tomcat_trend.pl

glenn 2005/04/09 08:24:44 Modified:jk/tools/reports tomcat_trend.pl Log: Update to support changes to error logging string format Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/tools/reports/tomcat_trend.pl Index: tomcat_trend.pl

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Peter Rossbach wrote: I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering. :( So it's safe to assume all 5.5 builds have some kind of issues with the clustering then, probably due to lack of actual production testing. >>Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible (mea

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

I thing the instability is also included at 5.5.7 clustering. >>Are you certain reverting to 5.5.8 clustering is not possible (meaning that it contains the same problems - or worse - as 5.5.9) ? If so, I think we >>need to forget about clustering stability for now, and mention that it is experim

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Peter Rossbach wrote: My customers needs the new 5.5.9 Release. The best thing is, we package a separate patch-cluster-fix and mark 5.5.9 as beta. Given the state of HEAD, and given some the 5.5.7 issues, I would like 5.5.9 to be stable. This means we would need a way to fix 5.5.9 without new maj

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Congratulation, too! Peter Yoav Shapira schrieb: Hi, The problem is that clustering only patches in HEAD may pick up incompatible changes, like the Session.getId patch. We also shouldn't do a new 5.5.10 tag based on HEAD, as it would pick up the risky stuff. Maybe one solution would be to do a

Re: [VOTE] 5.5.9 Stability

Hey, the problem is arround the keep a live handling code and the auto reconnect at SimpleTcpCluster. One thread can say: I drop the connection and open new one, then start transfer message and wait for ack. Other thread comes and see ups. the connection is not there. ( Arrg missing sychro