DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

- Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta... At 01:01 PM 3/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: Bill Barker wrote: It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

At 01:01 PM 3/7/2005, Mladen Turk wrote: >Bill Barker wrote: >>> >>>It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp >>>code present in CVS ? >>Well, Gump is still failing to build mod_jk against Apache 2.1.x-dev ;-). > >Yep, look at the thread at httpd-dev about making 2.1.3 as b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] New: - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28991] - webxml/webinc generation in jspc ant task ignores package param

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15555] - Setting cookie="false" appears to still use cookies.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33883] New: - openssl pkcs12 -infile/-outfile bad options in SSL Configuration HOW-TO example

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22294] - JSPC class name doesn't match Jasper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22293] - JSPC class name doesn't match Jasper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java

markt 2005/03/07 13:57:45 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Tag: tomcat_4_branch JspC.java Log: Fix bug 22293 by applying Jean-Frederic's suggested patch. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revisi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33777] - tomcat not supporting jrockit jdk

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33881] - Objects in session populate by listener requires entries in classpath for undeploy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29777] - HttpServletRequest#getParameterNames problem

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33881] New: - Objects in session populate by listener requires entries in classpath for undeploy

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Bill Barker wrote: It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp code present in CVS ? Well, Gump is still failing to build mod_jk against Apache 2.1.x-dev ;-). Yep, look at the thread at httpd-dev about making 2.1.3 as beta. First, WIN32 build can not be made because APR build

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33777] - tomcat not supporting jrockit jdk

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32278] - install4iis.js failed in Window 2000 system

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31587] - Problems with jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/configure and HP-UX 11.0

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

- Original Message - From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion about Tomcat dev" Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:26 AM Subject: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta... > Hi to all, > > It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp > code present in CVS ? > Well

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33843] - native jk connector ignores LDFLAGS when compiling

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 Makefile.in

mturk 2005/03/07 10:38:50 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 Makefile.in Log: Fix #33843 by adding defined LDFLAGS. Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/Makefile.in Index: Makefile.in ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33343] - mod_jk (v1.2.6 or newer) fails redirecting DirectoryIndex maped to tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Broken link

no it contains a virus. this has nothing to do with me their is a virus Filipe Lautert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've found a broken link at the end of this page: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/status.html and here the same problem: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-d

Broken link

I've found a broken link at the end of this page: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/status.html and here the same problem: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/status.html Section "Open Bugs". Where it says: "The list of the bugs which are in an unresolved state for Tomca

Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

Hi: I'm seeing the following unexpected behavior on Tomcat 5.5.7: Place a context configuration file in CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/localhost/myapp.xml with a mistyped docBase attribute (so as to be point to a non-existent directory). Startup and then shutdown Tomcat; Tomcat seems to delete bo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/juli/src/java/org/apache/juli ClassLoaderLogManager.java

remm2005/03/07 05:26:59 Modified:juli/src/java/org/apache/juli ClassLoaderLogManager.java Log: - private -> protected. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +11 -11 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/juli/src/java/org/apache/juli/ClassLoaderLogManager.java Index: ClassLoader

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33810] - Stream closed errors from JSP tags under load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Ok. It's good to know that we could in a near future have direct Apache / Tomcat connectivity allready bundled in HTTPD releases On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:16:31 +0100, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > And the code in mod_proxy_ajp contains all the latests jk modificati

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33869] - tomcat5 has classloading problems

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Henri Gomez wrote: And the code in mod_proxy_ajp contains all the latests jk modifications ? No. Mod_jk contains backported concepts from mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer :). Other things like domain model clustering will be ported to mod_proxy_balancer, but that's not high priority. Regards, M

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

And the code in mod_proxy_ajp contains all the latests jk modifications ? On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:24:54 +0100, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great > > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:12:34 +0100, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > > Hi to all, > > > > > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33869] - tomcat5 has classloading problems

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Great On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:12:34 +0100, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > Hi to all, > > > > It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp > > code present in CVS ? > > > > Think it will be 2.1.4 rather then 2.1.3. > mod_proxy_ajp is w

Re: Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi to all, > > It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp > code present in CVS ? > Think it will be 2.1.4 rather then 2.1.3. mod_proxy_ajp is working BTW :) . Mladen. - To unsubscribe,

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

request for tomcat-dev list admins

Could you remove these two accounts who send back to me (and probably others), any post to tomcat-dev ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional com

Apache 2.1.3 may be beta...

Hi to all, It seems Apache 2.1.3 may became beta, what about the state of ajp code present in CVS ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]