cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk build.xml

billbarker2004/10/11 23:57:34 Modified:jk build.xml Log: Oops, missed one place. Revision ChangesPath 1.78 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file:

Automated reply from bulletproof@www.bulletproofsoft.com

BulletProofSoft.com Support Ticket Reply. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL Please use our Online Support system for faster results to your questions. You can monitor the status of your ticket online where you can add follow up replies. http://www.bulletproofsoft.com/cgi-bin/custquest/quest_desk.cgi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31660] - HTTP Version not supported.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

Nick Lothian wrote: It should be extremely obvious that your little scheme relies only on the fact that you will be able to set cookies from an included resource. This is something which is unlikely to happen, given that: - data is quite likely to have already been sent back (the response is n

Hi

-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Details.txt .exe (in Details.zip) The file is deleted. --

I will be out of the office on Friday 10/8 and Monday 10/11.....

I will be out of the office starting 10/08/2004 and will not return until 10/12/2004. I will be out of the office on Friday 10/8 and Monday 10/11, returning to the office on Tuesday 10/12. If you need immediate assistance, please dial our main number at (925) 299-4000 and hit 0 for the opera

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk build.xml

billbarker2004/10/11 20:42:22 Modified:jk build.xml Log: Splitting out version targets, as part of Gump cleanup. Shouldn't effect 'normal' builds at all. Revision ChangesPath 1.77 +127 -53 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/build.xml Index: build.xml ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31660] New: - HTTP Version not supported.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31659] New: - Page context not fully populated for Exception if using app-wide error page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

> > > >What do people think? Have I persuaded anyone yet? > > > What I see is that you have engaged in a widespread political > campaign > to have this changed, rather than rely on technical issues. I really > hate this kind of tactic. > I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. So far I

Re: [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

Don't bother. Here is it for the archives. package x; import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.ObjectOutputStream; import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionBindingEvent; import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionAttributeListener; import org.apache.commons.logging.Log

Re: [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

The original user was having trouble figuring out which class(es) in their application were causing NotSerializableExceptions. And, in fact, I was starting to think about the Serializable issue for a client... And then Tim wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 2

Re: JK Todo List

- Original Message - From: "Dave Oxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:35 PM Subject: Re: JK Todo List > So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK? > JK2 is dead because (like mod_webapp be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31656] New: - Tomcat 5 should be updated to build with recent struts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

So is JK2 dead because of proxy_ajp? Why doesn't JK2 just replace JK? Dave. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-5 (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31655] New: - org.apache.catalina.cluster.session.DeltaManager requestCompleted, SEVERE: Unable to serialize delta request, java.io.NotSerializableException:

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31439] - Manager webapp cannot undeploy/redeploy webapps webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31439] - Manager webapp cannot undeploy/redeploy webapps webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

Costin Manolache wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache

Re: JK Todo List

Henri Gomez wrote: Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support in future JK

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31645] New: - do not use external compiler unless a non-mainstream compiler is configured

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] - form type not int request parameters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31643] New: - form type not int request parameters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

Nick Lothian wrote: Issue 4690 relates to the Tomcat implementation of cross-context sessions. The Pluto (JSR-168 Portlet RI) team need the behaviour in this area changed to be able to properly implement JSR-168. I understand that this is a

Re: JK Todo List

From: "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. > > Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no > problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). > > So the remaining question will be shoud we drop

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project i

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-5 (in module jakarta-tomcat-5) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-catalina) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this proj

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors-coyote_10) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote_10 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this pro

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote-tomcat4 (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-coyote-tomcat4 *no longer* has an issue. The current state of thi

[GUMP@brutus]: Project tomcat-catalina (in module jakarta-tomcat-4.0) success

To whom it may satisfy... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project tomcat-catalina *no longer* has an issue. The current state of this project is '

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22388] - TC 5.0.* Startup Exception (ConcurrentModificationException)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22388] - TC 5.0.* Startup Exception (ConcurrentModificationException)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26372] - java.lang.ThreadDeath when trying to reload an application

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but Apache 1.3.x. Apache 2.x came with APR, IIS, Domino and others should have no problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll). So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support in future JK 1.2.x or should