Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27006] - libtool: install: error: cannot install `../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/apache2

mod_jk2.so is there but libjkjni.so isn't, which seems to be what its complaining about. From a previous email ... make clean build > makeOutput -> This produces the attached makeOutput file and the following error to the terminal: libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /u

[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration, and has b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27553] - Bad cookie in request logged as error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteAdapter.java

remm2004/03/09 16:00:23 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteAdapter.java Log: - Much less verbose logging when there's a bad cookie. Unexpected exceptions will be handled by service. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27167] - Apache 2.0.48 Tomcat 5.0.19 and JNI at windows xmp not working

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

PATCH jk_uriEnv.c - duplicated GET property

Good morning All. In jk_uriEnv.c, the getAttr function presently supports both "uri" and "path" as properties. However both 'properties' return the same value, namely uriEnv->uri. This patch removes "path" from the getAttr properties list only, the nett affect being that one less (duplicated) colu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27553] New: - Bad cookie in request logged as error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18250] - Specifying "%" as a parameter value causes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10903] -

This account does not exist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10903] - Unbalanced tags do not generate compile time error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27552] - minProcessors and minSpareThreads are not honored at startup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27552] New: - minProcessors and minSpareThreads are not honored at startup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24086] - [Administration]Http 500 error in "Logger" page, when use mozilla, click "back" in toolbar

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24085] - [Administration] The group and role list disappear! When "Create New User", "save" directly without filling in form.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users GroupForm.java UserForm.java

amyroh 2004/03/09 13:49:37 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users GroupForm.java UserForm.java Log: Port fix for 24085 from TC 5. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +27 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/cla

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users GroupForm.java UserForm.java

amyroh 2004/03/09 13:45:02 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/users GroupForm.java UserForm.java Log: Fix 24085 - Display group and role list when validation fails. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +26 -3 jakarta-tom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27547] - extra "\n" in jsp output

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: jk2 new shmem using APR

Hi, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>As per above, Solaris apr build appears to have bugs. As yet I have not >>>had the time to look at why. I believe there's a problem with the file rights, not with SHM self. I think the scoreboard is created by the init process, but later on when the child wants t

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27006] - libtool: install: error: cannot install `../../../build/jk2/apache2/jkjni.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/apache2

From: "Al Banard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > /bin/sh /usr/lib/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=install /bin/cp > ../../../build/jk2/apache2/mod_jk2.la `pwd`/../../../build/jk2/apache2 ... > /bin/sh /usr/lib/apache2/build/libtool --silent --mode=install /bin/cp > ../../../build/jk2/apache2/libjkjn

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq misc.xml

yoavs 2004/03/09 12:12:56 Modified:docs/faq misc.html docs/faq/printer misc.html xdocs-faq misc.xml Log: Fixed JavaRanch link. Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/docs/faq/misc.html Index: misc.html

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq misc.xml

yoavs 2004/03/09 12:11:45 Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html resources.html docs/faq misc.html docs/faq/printer misc.html xdocs-faq misc.xml Log: Added link to JavaRanch FAQ about Invoker Servlet. Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27547] - extra "\n" in jsp output

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

PATCH configwebcom.xml

Good morning All. Please find attached a patch foe what I believe is the last erroneous reference to lb:0. It left here as an attachment and replicated it below. Thanks, Norm --- configwebcom.xml.orig Fri Mar 5 0

tomcat monitor - Just in case

in case some commiters don't subscribe to tomcat-user. I plan to post the prototype tomcat monitor tonight. I just ran a couple of tests simulating 60 threads hitting the homepage on TC5.1.18. the monitor correctly registered an increase in activity while the 60 threads were hitting the serve

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17231] - POST is not work with some wml browser...

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27547] New: - extra "\n" in jsp output

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java

remm2004/03/09 10:51:29 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java Log: - Fix object name. Revision ChangesPath 1.39 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardWra

Re: mod_jk 1.2.6 and hung tomcat

Mike Charnoky wrote: > > Is there a concise reference for this problem? It is intrinsically a > tomcat issue or is it a problem with a badly behaved app? How can I > determine what is causing the hang? Is there something in the > archives that I am completely missing? In my case, Tomcat hangs

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager StatusTransformer.java

remm2004/03/09 10:39:25 Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager StatusTransformer.java Log: - Replace '?' with 0 which is easier to process using data binding tools. - Submitted by Peter Lin. Revision ChangesPath

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager status.xsd

This account does not exist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager status.xsd

remm2004/03/09 10:35:14 Modified:webapps/manager status.xsd Log: - Scema fixes, submitted by Peter Lin. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +15 -15jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager/status.xsd Index: status.xsd ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16113] - removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServletWrapper.java

kinman 2004/03/09 09:53:37 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet Tag: tomcat_4_branch JspServletWrapper.java Log: - Patch by Torsten Fohrer Fix for bug 16113: removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404 Revision Changes

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

Hi, >AFAIK you can subscribe people to the deny list as moderator by >sending a mail to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] You must >use your moderator's address when you do that. Hmm, I've tried that without success in the past and was told to contact apmail (which I did, and they took care of it). Maybe I c

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

> -Original Message- > From: Shapira, Yoav > >I know it would require lot of work to implement that, but > IMO it will > stop > >the auto subscribe programs. > > It will stop the auto-subscribe programs, but at too great an > infrastructure cost I think. Anyways, it's not my call: yo

Re: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup, and ezmlm supports this via a deny list functionality. > However, this feature is not available to list moderators such as > myself under the current setup and must be requested from the > general mail administrator. AFAIK you can

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

Hi, >Don't know if that would solve the amount of fake list subscription, but >perhaps the mechanism like one on bugzilla (for creating accounts) would >help. >I know it would require lot of work to implement that, but IMO it will stop >the auto subscribe programs. It will stop the auto-subscrib

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

> -Original Message- > From: Shapira, Yoav > Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies > > > Hi, > I don't know, I've forwarded your filtering suggestion to the > general Apache mail admin. > One other thing. Don't know if that would solve the amount of fake list

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

> > As per above, Solaris apr build appears to have bugs. As > yet I have not had > > the time to look at why. > > > > Does the above help? > > I very seriously doubt this. Apache uses shared memory for > the scoreboard > communication between the parent and child processes. In > Apache 2

mod_jk 1.2.6 and hung tomcat

Hello, I have been searching through the archives for references to an apparently common "hung tomcat problem". We have been encountering this with our tomcat installation (tomcat 4.1.24 / apache 1.3.27 / mod_jk 1.2.4) and I am trying to piece together more information on how to fix it. It se

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

Hi, I don't know, I've forwarded your filtering suggestion to the general Apache mail admin. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-Original Message- >From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:22 AM >To: 'Tomcat Developers List' >Subject: RE: [OT]

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

> -Original Message- > From: George Sexton > Subject: RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies > > I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these? > > I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be > the only one that consistently has this

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

Perhaps it is a combination of two things. On other lists like Linux-Kernel, subscribers are not clueless enough to use an auto-responder that replies to messages that have "Precedence: bulk" set. Additionally, most UNIX auto-responders will only send one notice per configurable time period (i.e.

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

Hi, >I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these? Why wouldn't it? It's a message sent to the list from a subscribed address. >I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be the only one >that consistently has this problem. This is pretty amazing considerin

RE: [OT] unsubscribe stupid users with auto-replies

I think a bigger issue is why is the list software forwarding these? I have subscribed to many other lists, and this seems to be the only one that consistently has this problem. This is pretty amazing considering the low number of subscribers. -Original Message- From: Guenter Knauf [mai

Re: jk2 new shmem using APR

jean-frederic clere wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >> >> The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support. So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's implementation is bogus, one c

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

> -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > I very seriously doubt this. Apache uses shared memory for the > > scoreboard communication between the parent and child > processes. In > > Apache 2.0, this is done

Re: jk2 new shmem using APR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > >>>The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is >>>APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support. >>>So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's >>>implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr. >> >

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core ContextManager.java

billbarker2004/03/09 07:22:11 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core ContextManager.java Log: Updating version to 3.3.3-dev. Revision ChangesPath 1.209 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/ContextManager.java Index: ContextManager.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27537] - a likely serious error in the ThreadPool.java

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Unet Requests #118361] [ANN] Release of Tomcat 3.3.2

This is an automated response. There is no need to reply. Hello, from Networking & Telecommunication Services. Your message regarding: [Unet R

[ANN] Release of Tomcat 3.3.2

The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 3.3.2. This is the latest stable release in the Tomcat 3 line, and users of Tomcat 3.x are encouraged to upgrade to 3.3.2. This release includes bugfixes from 3.3.1, as well as some new feature enhancements such as support for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16113] - removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

No such list!

to these mailing lists (who are, given the context, assume= - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email account utilization warning.

Hi, >It is a little strange that noone from the apache team has stepped >forward to clarify that these are fake... since they are being sent >to an apache mailing list after all. That depends on how you define "stepped forward." We've identified these as fake/virus emails early on. There was n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27537] New: - a likely serious error in the ThreadPool.java

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

> > APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY appears bogus on Solaris 2.8 with 0.94 > > and CVS (1.0). > > > > First of all why? What is the reason, apr or solaris? Looks like it is apr. > > How can you change the apr build as mod_jk2 builds apr when > > trying to make apr for apache 1.3.x? Using Suns complie

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is > > APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support. > > So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's > > implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building ap

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

> The entire shm support will be available _only_ if there is > APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY support. > So if the particular platform doesn't implement that, or the apr's > implementation is bogus, one can disable that when building apr. APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY appears bogus on Solaris 2.8 with 0.94 and CV

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9737] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when sending just parameter name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

RE: jk2 new shmem using APR

Yoav, Can you kill this account? Think that anyone posting to this list during last few days receives the message stating that this account doesn't exists. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 12:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PR

jk2 new shmem using APR

Hi, I'm working on a new shmem for JK2 implementation using APR (It took me more then I've expected :-). After having few different implementations, here is what I propose: Use the shared memory (anonymous where applicable) through apr_rmm. The entire shm support will be available _only_ if th

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/conf jk2.manifest

remm2004/03/09 03:44:04 Modified:jk/conf jk2.manifest Log: - Add two JARs for Tomcat 5 (untested). Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/conf/jk2.manifest Index: jk2.manifest

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25245] - [RFE] it should be possible to stop/start/reload web-apps

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27527] - Cannot run under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27517] - The pageEncoding attribute is not used, when charset value is set.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JkUriSet bug.

NormW wrote: > Good morning All > > In Mod_Jk2, jk_UriEnv.c, line 419, jk_uriEnv.c. > there is is a test to determine which end > of a URL template string has the *, to determine if the 'match type' should > be PREFIX or SUFFIX. > [ if (uri[strlen(uri) - 1] == '*') { ] > > A URL template f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] - Servlet invoked twice with JK2 when response is not read completely.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] - Servlet invoked twice with JK2 when response is not read completely.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] New: -

This account does not exist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27534] New: - Servlet invoked twice with JK2 when response is not read completely.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu