[GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-5/jakarta-tomcat-5 failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration, an

Recent Patches - Tab 'Fix'

Good afternoon All. Attached are three patches requested by an under-cover tab policeman. No offence intended, but I'm obliged to assist the police in this matter. Norm --- changes.txt.orig Fri Feb 27 20:09:16 2004 +++ cha

PATCH for jk_worker_status.c

Good afternoon All. Please find attached a minor change to allow a display option. Norm --- jk_worker_status.c.orig Fri Feb 27 20:49:26 2004 +++ jk_worker_status.c Sat Feb 28 14:08:27 2004 @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ jk2_worker_status_displayScoreboardInfo(env, s, s->workerEnv ); retur

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27309] New: - NPE in ApplicationHttpRequest.java:546

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27307] New: - Suggestions to improve JNDI/DataSource Howto

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

While we're at the subject of fixing broken links, the README.txt link on Tomcat 5's introduction page: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/introduction.html is still broken -- (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/README.txt) -- Ankur Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15642] - Null pointer in org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector that did not happen in org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

Amy Roh wrote: K. I can reproduce the problem with 4.1.30 build but not in the workspace. Looks like the latest org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector with allowTrace didn't get tagged for 4.1.30. 4.1.30 tag has outdated o.a.c.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector 4.1.30 was tagged about one month befor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27300] - SMAP line numbers incorrect when JSP comments are present

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25508] - JNDI Does Not Set Up "comp" namespace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems inthe adminapplication

Hi Jeff, I've not seen the first post from you, so ignore if that isnt your problem... > I just did the following steps: > 1) downloaded jakarta-tomcat-4.1.30.zip from jakarta.apache.org > 2) unzipped the zip file > 3) edited conf\tomcat-users.xml, adding the "admin" and "manager" roles > to the "t

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

Yeah, that's what it looked like. Larry's backport of the "allowTrace" stuff in the connector code came after the TOMCAT_4_1_30 tag, whereas in the admin application, the file that wanted to look for the allowTrace, in EditConnectorAction.java WAS tagged with 4.1.30 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/27/04

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

K. I can reproduce the problem with 4.1.30 build but not in the workspace. Looks like the latest org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector with allowTrace didn't get tagged for 4.1.30. 4.1.30 tag has outdated o.a.c.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector Amy ---

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problems inthe adminapplication

I'm wondering if it is fixed in the head of CVS in some manner, then >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/27/04 3:57:05 PM >>> Just rebuilt Tomcat 4 from CVS, followed your steps and I do not see this problem. (Win XP, JDK1.4.2_03). > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Tulley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problems inthe adminapplication

Just rebuilt Tomcat 4 from CVS, followed your steps and I do not see this problem. (Win XP, JDK1.4.2_03). > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Tulley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: allowTrace attribute causing probl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15572] - Catalina's -nonaming command line option does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

I just did the following steps: 1) downloaded jakarta-tomcat-4.1.30.zip from jakarta.apache.org 2) unzipped the zip file 3) edited conf\tomcat-users.xml, adding the "admin" and "manager" roles to the "tomcat" user 4) Start up Tomcat (catalina start) 5) hit http://localhost:8080 6) Navigate to the "

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java

markt 2004/02/27 14:43:09 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Catalina.java Log: Fix bug 15572. Ensure the catalina.useNaming property is set before executing the digester so the -nonaming command line option has an effect. Patch provided by Gary Benson.

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

I can't reproduce this one either. Clean install might be the answer... > Yeah, I saw this on a newly-downloaded Tomcat 4.1.30 on SUSE linux 8.2, > java 1.3.1 (Sun?) I first saw it on NetWare, JVM 1.4.2. I thought it > was something I had done wrong on NetWare, so I quickly tried it on > Linux

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

Yeah, I saw this on a newly-downloaded Tomcat 4.1.30 on SUSE linux 8.2, java 1.3.1 (Sun?) I first saw it on NetWare, JVM 1.4.2. I thought it was something I had done wrong on NetWare, so I quickly tried it on Linux. Let me try a restart as you suggest, and try it on Windows with a clean download

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm UserDatabaseRealm.java

markt 2004/02/27 14:08:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm UserDatabaseRealm.java Log: Provide an implementation for getName() and getPassword(). Found this whilst trying to use CLIENT-CERT authentication with the Sun web services devel

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm UserDatabaseRealm.java

markt 2004/02/27 14:03:03 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm UserDatabaseRealm.java Log: Provide an implementation for getName() and getPassword(). Found this whilst trying to use CLIENT-CERT authentication with the Sun web services devel

RE: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the adminapplication

Hi Jeff, I tested this before the 4.1.30 release, and just retested it, and it continues to work for me without your patch. Since the protocolHandler doesn't support the "allowTrace" property, the setProperty() is unnecessary in Tomcat 5.0.x and shouldn't make a difference in Tomcat 4.1.30. It i

Re: allowTrace attribute causing problems in the admin application

Actually, if I am not mistaken, the attached txt file patches the problem. An IntrospectionHelper.setProperty was needed for allowTrace. On 5.0.x this was done "automatically" by setting a property in the setAllowTrace setter. Then the properties were set into IntrospectionHelper en masse later.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include jk_worker.h

Good morning All. >From my source, a 302 code is "Found - the requested resource lies temporarily under a different URI", which doesn't seem to match very closely the text of the default noWorkerMsg. Speaking of which, the word 'temporary' in the #define noWorkerMsg should be 'temporarily'. Norm

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c

Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:07 AM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c hgomez 2004/02/27 01:07:23 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_

Re: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Michal Kostrzewa wrote: Hi, I think the files http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf and http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf are broken. When attempting to open them Acrobat Reader repo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15400] - doTrace implementation cannot handle multiple header names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

allowTrace attribute causing problems in the admin application

When I browse to a Coyote Connector in Tomcat's admin in 4.1.30, I get an HTTP 500 error - "Error retrieving attribute allowTrace". I know the allowTrace functionality was added about a month ago, and was not a required attribute on the connector. This functionality works in Tomcat 5.0.19, but no

Re: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

> A manual copy seems to work fine. Note size difference, before: > -rw-rw-r-- 1 remm jakarta 46121 Feb 14 11:27 serverStartup.pdf > after: > -rw-rw-r-- 1 remm jakarta 46175 Feb 27 11:40 serverStartup.pdf > Thank you very much! everything is OK now :) Good to see such a beautiful diagrams!

RE: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Howdy, >>Maybe it occurs because I upload the docs using a zip. I'll try to >>improve this in the next release. > >Good theory, I didn't check that. But I think for right now I'll >overwrite the PDFs on the site with the ones from CVS manually. Thanks, A manual copy seems to work fine. Note si

RE: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Howdy, >Maybe it occurs because I upload the docs using a zip. I'll try to >improve this in the next release. Good theory, I didn't check that. But I think for right now I'll overwrite the PDFs on the site with the ones from CVS manually. Thanks, Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any att

Re: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, I think the files http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0- doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf and http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0- doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf are broken. They're broken on the web site, but they're OK in

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

mturk 2004/02/27 11:28:51 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c Log: Remove the SF_NOTIFY_AUTH_COMPLETE define checking. If someone wishes to compile jk2 he will anyhow need the platform SDK. Any sdk since year 2000 has that defined in the httpfilt.h Revisio

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsw

mturk 2004/02/27 11:15:45 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsw Log: Change the dependencies so that VS7 makes correct solution file Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +6 -6 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsw Index: isapi.dsw

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 Makefile.apxs.in Makefile.in NWGNUmakefile mod_jk2.dsp

truk2004/02/27 11:14:33 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 Makefile.apxs.in Makefile.in NWGNUmakefile mod_jk2.dsp Log: Remove HAS_PCRE and add HAS_AP_PCRE. From Guenter Knauf. apache2 doesn't need --with-pcre now and is silently ignored. pcre suppor

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c jk_uriMap.c

truk2004/02/27 11:10:07 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c jk_uriMap.c Log: Use apache pcre functions when HAVE_AP_PCRE is defined. From Guenter Knauf. Revision ChangesPath 1.54 +16 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c Index: jk

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27300] - SMAP line numbers incorrect when JSP comments are present

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

HI, >Ok, two have gone. >I'm sending you the header's of the rest two I receive. > > >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good, we're making progress. I've booted [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] off tomcat-dev, in addition to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I unsubscribed earlier. Hopefully you'll

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TextOptimizer.java

kinman 2004/02/27 10:54:34 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TextOptimizer.java Log: - Fix bugzilla 27300: Wrong Smap when jsp comments are present Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +3 -6 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/sh

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp

mturk 2004/02/27 10:53:30 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp Log: Remove unneeded linker paths to apr and pcre libraries. Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsp Index: isapi.dsp ==

RE: Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Howdy, >I think the files > >http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0- >doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf > >and > >http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0- >doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf > >are broken. They're broken on the web site, but they're OK in CVS: h

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp isapi.dsw

mturk 2004/02/27 10:48:22 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp isapi.dsw Log: Remove unneeded link targets to apr libraries. Use the dependencies instead. Revision ChangesPath 1.25 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23610] - unknown SSI directives

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:07 AM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c > hgomez 2004/02/27 01:07:23 > > Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c > L

Are the docs: serverStartup.pdf and requestProcess.pdf broken?

Hi, I think the files http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/requestProcess/requestProcess.pdf and http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/architecture/startup/serverStartup.pdf are broken. I've tested in under linux with gs and under Windows with Acrobat Reade

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27300] New: - SMAP line numbers incorrect when JSP comments are present

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27299] - Using -security and port 80 causes crash

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

> -Original Message- > From: Shapira, Yoav > > Nonetheless, I've sent new unsubscribe instructions to the > above three addresses, which I can do as a moderator for > tomcat-dev. Try sending a message to this list in a few > minutes and see if you still get all three responses, or i

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

> From: Guenter Knauf > I dont use a > SPAM mailer such as Outlook; so chances that a worm has > subscribed to one of those lists from my machine is == 0. :-). > In addition I believe that many do just the same as I: they > have a separate account for list post, and a white list which > o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27299] New: - Using -security and port 80 causes crash

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3888] - WebappClassLoader: Lifecycle error : CL stopped

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

Hi, > There are a variety of causes. We've seen a great increase in the > number of 'smart' spam mailers than can subscribe themselves to our > lists. Accordingly, the amount of things like the above has increased. > The fact that only you get these three messages suggest it's your > computer or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17668] - mod_jk2 does not handle multiple wildcards in one regular expression

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

Hi, >In fact I'm receiving tree mails on each post i make (_very_ annoying ). > >1. Thank you for your enquiry or message. (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >2. Dear PC Mechanic Supporter, (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >3. Thank you for your email to The Bridal Shop. (from >[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >The second one

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27296] - Session may be used before being declared valid

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27296] New: - Session may be used before being declared valid

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

> From: Jeff Tulley > > This has happened to a few people in the last few months. > Whomever from radgametools that is subscribed here needs to > unsubscribe out of curteousy to the rest of the group, or > subscribe on of these "accepted" > addresses they list. > In fact I'm receiving tree

Re: [OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

This has happened to a few people in the last few months. Whomever from radgametools that is subscribed here needs to unsubscribe out of curteousy to the rest of the group, or subscribe on of these "accepted" addresses they list. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/27/04 6:33:38 AM >>> Anyone has a clue wh

RE: jk2 buglets

Hi Greg, > Same sort of issue: > [Fri Feb 27 15:12:08 2004] (error ) [jk_shm.c (163)] shm.create(): error > creating /tmp/cr.sandwich.pfizer.com_81.shm 2117992 22 0x1f5020 Invalid > argument > [Fri Feb 27 15:12:08 2004] (error ) [jk_shm.c (238)] shm.create(): error > mmapping /tmp/cr.sandwich.pf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27216] - Problem start app with document base containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: jk2 buglets

> > /* First make sure the file exists and is big enough > */ > rc=apr_file_open( &file, shm->fname, > APR_READ | APR_WRITE | APR_CREATE | APR_BINARY, > APR_WREAD|APR_WWRITE|APR_WEXECUTE, > globalShmPool); Thanks Guenter, Same sort of iss

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.rc

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yoavs 2004/02/27 07:14:09 Modified:coyote/src/test/org/apache/coyote SimpleAdapter.java http11/src/test/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 FileTester.java RandomAdapter.java TestAdapter.java jk/native/domino con

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.rc

On 27 Feb 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently many C files don't have the license? This is bad. The insert_license.pl script from almost the same location that holds the Java file you've used worked quite well for me to mass add licenses to files in Gump. You'd probably need to add

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.rc

yoavs 2004/02/27 07:14:09 Modified:coyote/src/test/org/apache/coyote SimpleAdapter.java http11/src/test/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 FileTester.java RandomAdapter.java TestAdapter.java jk/native/domino config.h jk/na

jakarta-tomcat-catalina changed to Apache License 2.0

Hi, I've finished migrating this module to license 2.0, added the NOTICE file, and tested a clean anonymous build from scratch -- no problem. I've also hand-inspected a dozen or so files to make sure they're fine, again no problems. Assuming no objects, I'll proceed with jakarta-tomcat-connectors

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27293] - Date computation incorrect, causing If-Unmodified-Since failure

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java

remm2004/02/27 07:06:54 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java Log: - Bug 27293: Fix if-unmodified-since check, using the old-and-simple trick of adding 1000. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +2 -2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27293] - Date computation incorrect, causing If-Unmodified-Since failure

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278. Seems to be a problem with 16bits int ? Sure :-). Well I'd like to use apr types on all function calls, returning APR_STATUS, etc... Ok, but for next release,

RE: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

> -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez > > While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278. > > Seems to be a problem with 16bits int ? > Sure :-). Well I'd like to use apr types on all function calls, returning APR_STATUS, etc... Some work has already been done,

Moving to license 2.0

Hi, I've started migrating the jakarta-tomcat-catalina module to the Apache License v2.0 per the instructions in http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html. I assume no one else is doing this at this time, so no conflicts or issues should arise? I should be done within a few hours, depending o

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the release. Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!! While you take a look at IIS, could you investigate the BR #15278. Seems to be a problem

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_shm.c

hgomez 2004/02/27 06:25:32 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_shm.c Log: Revert to old code until APR shm problem is fixed... Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +85 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c Index: jk_shm.c

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c

hgomez 2004/02/27 06:24:57 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c Log: Move translate to APR_HOOK_MIDDLE and make sure mod_rewrite will be before us Revision ChangesPath 1.69 +8 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c Inde

RE: jk2 buglets

Hi, > Permissions should be ok. It does create a file, but with 0 size (even > though we have set something like 16m) > ie: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root other 0 Feb 27 12:31 > cr.sandwich.pfizer.com_81.shm > Compared to the old version (same config bar the name and old conector > used) >

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

Hi, > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR. sure, agreed; and I work closely together with those maintaining Apache at Novell, as well as with the core OS folks; but I cant expect that I have mmap support in APR before the next half year... > I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16331] - don't override the default port for the channelSocket

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object... That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR. I agree, but let fix this pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14177] - modJk value used for jkConfig

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

Henri Gomez wrote: > Guenter Knauf wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review >> >> >> >> http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff > > > Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object... That is a work-around... The correct would be to fix APR. > > --

jk2 : init child

I'm looking now why jk2_init() can't find child XXX in scoreboard. The MPM should BEFORE after us ? : ap_hook_child_init(jk2_child_init, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_LAST); - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

Q: why was jk2 doc removed from TC5?

Hi, found yesterday that the jk2 folder belows tomcat-docs is now removed, and the link now goes online to apache.org? what was the reason for this change? Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2. Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean the IIS port. Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make

RE: jk2 buglets

> -Original Message- > From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 February 2004 13:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: jk2 buglets > > > Hi Greg, > >> look at your apr.h for APR_HAS_MMAP and tell us how this is set... > > > #define APR_HAS_MMAP 1 > > tha

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

Henri Gomez wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> Mladen Turk wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2. >>> Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean >>> the IIS >>> port. >>> >>> Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff Seems ok for me, I commit if nobody object... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-m

[OT] [FW: Please update your email address...]

Anyone has a clue why I'm receiving this on each mail send to this group? > -Original Message- > From: Autoresponder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Please update your email address... > > Reply-To: Autoresponder <[

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

jean-frederic clere wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfie

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

Hi, > Let's go Guenter, send the patch for review http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_shm.c.diff thanks, Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

Hi, >> -Original Message- >> From: jean-frederic clere >> > >> > Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we >> can make the >> > release. >> >> Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!! >> > How did you came to that number? > I'm seeing only 25 of them. I've also have

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

Mladen Turk wrote: > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: jean-frederic clere >> >>>Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we >> >>can make the >> >>>release. >> >>Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!! >> > > > How did you came to that number? http://nagoya.a

RE: jk2 buglets

Hi Greg, >> look at your apr.h for APR_HAS_MMAP and tell us how this is set... > #define APR_HAS_MMAP 1 thats strange. Is is possible that there's a permission issue with creating the file? Can you please try to configure the shm file to be created in a public writable dir, f.e. /t

Re: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

jean-frederic clere wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I finally have a couple of days to spare on JK2. Since Henri is doing great job on Apache side, I'm willing to clean the IIS port. Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we can make the release. Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help i

RE: JK2 Close to 2.0.4

> -Original Message- > From: jean-frederic clere > > > > Are there any pending issues that I can help with, so we > can make the > > release. > > Bugzilla reports 59 bugs... Help is _needed_ !!! > How did you came to that number? I'm seeing only 25 of them.

Re: [PATCH] jki_shm.c revert code removal v1.35-v1.36

Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi all, I would like to get the MMAP code back into CVS which was removed with version 1.36: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_shm.c?r1=1.35&r2=1.36 This code would enable the scoreboard working on NetWare; and probably on other p

RE: jk2 buglets

> Hi, > > Testing the jk2-2.0.3 cvs we seem to get this error, which > makes 2.0.3-dev > > useable for us. > you mean 2.0.4-dev? > > > I can only assume others are not seeing this (apache 1.3.26 > + mod_perl) on > > Solaris 2.8 (sparc). Has anyone had any success with 1.3.x > on Solaris >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27276] - JAASCallbackHandler gives erroneous warning due to buggy implementation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

  1   2   >