cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java

2004-01-07 Thread amyroh
amyroh 2004/01/07 21:32:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java Log: Fix bugzilla 25878 - Add HostConfig after new Host is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4663] - Broken Pipe under some load

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Exception in RealmBase

2004-01-07 Thread Mark Woon
Hi all, I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone will responsd. I have a custom Realm implementation that extends org.apache.catalina.realm.RealmBase. It used to work in 4.x, but in 5.0.16, I'm getting the following exception on startup: 21:17:29,719 ERROR RealmBase:1092 - Can't register null

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11846] - Class loader problem

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11875] - AuthenticatorBase accessControl call makes unnecessary allocations

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java

2004-01-07 Thread markt
markt 2004/01/07 15:38:13 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java Log: - Fix bug 11875. A (very) minor optimisation but it closes a bug report. - Patch provided by Per Kreipke Revision ChangesPath 1.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread markt
markt 2004/01/07 15:34:31 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java Log: - Apply same patch as for bug 11682 to second ExpandWar.expand() Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +6 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/cata

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
OK, will do. Mark On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:52 PM, Remy Maucherat [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: > > What I found was the .war was uploaded to > > work\Standalone\localhost\bug11682 and then expanded to webapps. > > If I used a path of xyz then the .war was expanded t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11867] - Default Context in TC 4.0.4-B3

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: What I found was the .war was uploaded to work\Standalone\localhost\bug11682 and then expanded to webapps. If I used a path of xyz then the .war was expanded to webapps\xyz regardless of the name of the .war Ah ok. Nice :) (I didn't remember, but I did code that :) ) I think your

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
What I found was the .war was uploaded to work\Standalone\localhost\bug11682 and then expanded to webapps. If I used a path of xyz then the .war was expanded to webapps\xyz regardless of the name of the .war Mark On Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:41 PM, Remy Maucherat [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8611] - Sealed .jar files in WEB-INF/lib always fail to load second class

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that I am doing something stupid. This is what I did. Whilst looking into bug11682 I created a very simple web app (just index.jsp) made a war and then tried to deploy it via ant. I modified the build.xml from the manager how-to and added

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHostDeployer.java

2004-01-07 Thread Mark Thomas
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that I am doing something stupid. This is what I did. Whilst looking into bug11682 I created a very simple web app (just index.jsp) made a war and then tried to deploy it via ant. I modified the build.xml from the manager how-to and added the task below. Whe

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:50:32AM +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: > Me too... > The JK2 IMO is a pretty dead project. > Henri tried to boost that forcing the APR as a default, we did some work, > but it is agin stalled. Could someone put a big warning statment on the web site about this? Honestly, 90

[5.0.17] Tag next week

2004-01-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
I plan to tag 5.0.17 sometimes next week (earlier = better :) ). I'll commit a few fixes until then. (and 4.1.30 will follow some time later) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25965] - RequestDispatcher fails after cross context include

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25965] - RequestDispatcher fails after cross context include

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25965] New: - RequestDispatcher fails after cross context include

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24943] - Tomcat 5.0.14 / Windows 2000 Service does not start

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: HttpSession handling

2004-01-07 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, >Yes, the spec is not in sync with the javadoc. Neither one has been changed >since the version 2.2 of the spec. Which one should one trust more? Ask the JSR expert group for clarifications. >The reproduction code and the server log is shown below. I used tomcat Please open a bugzilla i

RE: HttpSession handling

2004-01-07 Thread Jarno . Peltoniemi
>Howdy, >>Reading the servlet spec raised a couple of thoughts about http session >The servlet spec v2.4, I hope? The servlet spec v2.4, final release. >>"SRV.7.6 Last Accessed Times >>The getLastAccessedTime method of the HttpSession interface allows a >>servlet >>to determine the last time th

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Glenn Nielsen a écrit : Rather than look at different architectures for implementing a web server connector to Tomcat I would rather focus on improving the connector. Digging into jk2 has been on my list of things to do but I haven't had time yet. mod_jk 1.2 with Apache 2 is working well enough fo

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25958] New: - Request.setCharacterEncoding doesn't work properly if you send form via get method and if you go to another page via link

2004-01-07 Thread Jess Holle
Note that Sun suggests use setCharacterEncoding() for exactly this purpose in their new "how-to" article at http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Intl/MultilingualJSP/. Amongst other things they say (under the heading "Handling Request Parameter Encodings" and after having described

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23929] - request.setCharacterEncoding(String) doesn't work

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25958] - Request.setCharacterEncoding doesn't work properly if you send form via get method and if you go to another page via link

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25958] New: - Request.setCharacterEncoding doesn't work properly if you send form via get method and if you go to another page via link

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25744] - Silent Installation Errors Out in 5.0.16

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25744] - Silent Installation Errors Out in 5.0.16

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25744] - Silent Installation Errors Out in 5.0.16

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25955] - Java Virtual Machine

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25955] New: - Java Virtual Machine

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25953] New: - Add ability for Realm authentication to tell the user the reason for auth failure

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Rather than look at different architectures for implementing a web server connector to Tomcat I would rather focus on improving the connector. Digging into jk2 has been on my list of things to do but I haven't had time yet. mod_jk 1.2 with Apache 2 is working well enough for me. I like the concep

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] New: - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

2004-01-07 Thread remm
remm2004/01/07 00:57:24 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Update NSIS again. - Use a property for SF location. Revision ChangesPath 1.115 +13 -7 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.default

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: Bill Barker > Sent: 7. siječanj 2004 9:22 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Jk2 object model > > > > > > I'm interested if jk2 could "plug" into more applications - > there aren't > > that many generic "connectors". KDE has one specialized for >

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:06 PM Subject: Re: Jk2 object model > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > > > From Costin Manolache > > > >>Sent: 6. siječanj 2004 8:11 > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subje

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-07 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: From Costin Manolache Sent: 6. siječanj 2004 8:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Jk2 object model jean-frederic clere wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: I remember some time ago Mladen (?) was suggesting to use C++ for jk2 instead of the pseudo-OO programming. I am -1