JSP implicit writer (out) vs. response.getWriter()

2003-11-22 Thread Karl Goldstein
Hi all, I recently started working with Tomcat (4.1.29) and ran into an inconsistency between the implicit "out" variable in a JSP and response.getWriter(). Consider this JSP: Me first. <% response.getWriter().println("Me second"); %> I was surprised to discover that the out of this is: M

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10040] - SingleSignOn valve unbounded memory use

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23881] - SingleSignOn and FormAuthenticator in embedded tomcat

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23881] - SingleSignOn and FormAuthenticator in embedded tomcat

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: SingleSignOn Valve and FormAuthenticator Principal Caching

2003-11-22 Thread Brian Stansberry
Hi, Your timing is good to bring this up. We should definitely compare notes. Last night I committed a patch to JBoss that deals with this issue (classes can be found in the JBoss CVS in the org.jboss.web.catalina.tc4 package; most are in the authenticator subpackage). The JBoss patch is rea

RE: SingleSignOn Valve and FormAuthenticator Principal Caching

2003-11-22 Thread Filip Hanik
open a bug, submit your patch to that bug, and someone will get to it :) Filip -Original Message- From: Nelson, Luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SingleSignOn Valve and FormAuthenticator Principal Caching I believe that

catalina.policy to avoid "no object DCH for MIME..."

2003-11-22 Thread Jun Inamori
Hi, We faced the same problem as: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg48320.html The message reports the exception when sending e-mail. It looks like this: javax.activation.UnsupportedDataTypeException: no object DCH for MIME type text/plain at javax.mail.Transpor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20073] - no object DCH for MIME type text/plain

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20073] - no object DCH for MIME type text/plain

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20714] - response charset defaults to iso-8859-1 where java 1.4.2beta ignores file.encoding and use platform default encoding...

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24563] - Problem with SSL authentication

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu