DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21529] New: - Bug in org.apache.catalina.authenticator.DigestAuthenticator

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Jan Luehe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable > Remy, > > > Jan Luehe wrote: > > > >> Currently, the limit up to whi

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
Well, it seems that the consensus is for the default servlet. That's where I'll make the changes for 3.3. - Original Message - From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:35 AM Subject: RE: [RFC] Handling the

Trying to make a patch, confused by Tomcat's CVS setup

2003-07-11 Thread David Wood
Hi, I have two patches for outstanding bugs of 4.1.24. I'm trying to pull down sources via CVS, both to make sure these patches are still needed, and to build the patch files themselves. I followed the instructions here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html I pulled out files tagged TOM

Re: tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-11 Thread Bob Lee
Steven, I did modify Jasper (Tomcat's JSP engine) a couple years back to support scripting languages in the JSP scriptlets. Though I don't have intimate knowledge of the Tomcat internals, they are pretty well documented, I do use it, and this type of low-level development is my specialty (and

Re: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:57:54AM -0700, David Rees wrote: > > System 4: > Dual Mips R10k 225MHz, SGI Java 1.4.1 SGI IRIX I was mistaken about the CPU freq of this machine, it really has 2 R10k 180MHz CPUs, not 225MHz. -Dave -

Re: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:10:21AM -0700, James Courtney wrote: > I didn't see an attachment that time. Thanks as this is interesting > stuff for Java development of any kind, not just Tomcat! Stupid me. Is attached now. -Dave import java.sql.*; import java.util.*; public class TestDatePerf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21524] New: - Thread Leak

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Bug in org.apache.catalina.authenticator.DigestAuthenticator

2003-07-11 Thread adam . hathcock
line 317: qop = removeQuotes(currentTokenValue); needs to be: qop = currentTokenValue; I was using the Tomcat 4.1.24 code as an example for Digest Authentication and discovered that the hashes weren't matching in my code. Since "auth" was being stripped to "ut", the hashes were screwed up. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16113] - removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Make output buffer size limit configurable

2003-07-11 Thread Jan Luehe
Remy, Jan Luehe wrote: Currently, the limit up to which the size of an org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer may grow is identical to the original buffer size: public OutputBuffer(int size) { bb = new ByteChunk(size); bb.setLimit(size); ... cb = new CharChunk

RE: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread James Courtney
David, I didn't see an attachment that time. Thanks as this is interesting stuff for Java development of any kind, not just Tomcat! Jamey James Courtney InPhonic, Inc. -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20663] - Cannot shutdown Tomcat gracefully

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20663] - Cannot shutdown Tomcat gracefully

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread David Rees
Here are the results from the last version of the TestDatePerf program I sent out. Below are the results from 3 different systems when run for 1 million iterations. Here's how I interpret the results: The program verifies the synchronization performance issue. Dual-CPU machines take a huge perfo

Re: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread David Rees
David Cassidy said: > > I've done some tests with the below code > hope this helps David, Could you give this version a try, and run it for 1 million iterations instead of just 10k? I'll be posting my results shortly for a couple of different machines shortly. The new version keeps the theoreti

tomcat job opportunity

2003-07-11 Thread Steven Pincus
Greetings.I work for an executive search firm in NY and am currently looking, on behalf of my client, for a Tomcat software engineering with a solid understanding of Tomcat internals. I can provide more details about the role and the client when we speak. I was hoping you or someone you kno

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21456] - logs/context lost when restarting Context

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16113] - removing then replacing a jsp page continues to give a 404

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21456] - logs/context lost when restarting Context

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21456] - logs/context lost when restarting Context

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3614] - bug in manager webapp

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

RE: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Keith Wannamaker
Hi Bill, I am partial to handling it in the default servlet. I agree the root context can't speak definitively for all contexts, but I think it has a better chance of knowing a proper response than the connector. Keith | -Original Message- | From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21504] New: - Possible clash of workdirs where compile JSPs are stored

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12263] - response.sendRedirect won't send to Tomcat SSL

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21503] New: - [PATCH] Need to add special emphasis for windows service to setting JAVA_HOME

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21502] New: - [PATCH]Manager doesn't use correct method to get number of active sessions

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12263] - response.sendRedirect won't send to Tomcat SSL

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: - Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL Bill Barker wrote: This is really a Request-For-Comments, I'm not proposing a

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq connectors.xml

2003-07-11 Thread funkman
funkman 2003/07/11 03:57:20 Modified:docs/faq connectors.html docs/faq/printer connectors.html xdocs-faq connectors.xml Log: Add q about jk2 config file location based on tomcat user conversation http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10578489323&r=1&w

[GUMP] Build timed out - jk2

2003-07-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init.taskdef: guess.os: [echo] build

Re: java Date related classes synchronization bottlenecks

2003-07-11 Thread David Cassidy
I've done some tests with the below code hope this helps David 10 Processor Sun Sparc 2i 400Mhz (Solaris 2.8) jdk 1.4.0-b92 time java TestDatePerf 1 1 real0m2.096s user0m1.901s sys 0m0.142s time java TestDatePerf 2 1 real0m4.848s user0m4.240s sys 0m1.372s time

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21489] - Catalina-ant task: problem with config parameter

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21489] - Catalina-ant task: problem with config parameter

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21489] - Catalina-ant task: problem with config parameter

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21472] - JDBCRealm: Auth ok but Not Authorized

2003-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:29 PM Subject: Re: [RFC] Handling the '*' URL > Bill Barker wrote: > > This is really a Request-For-Comments, I'm not proposing anything. I'm