DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5952] - Refence to $JAVACMD in tomcat.conf incorrect in RPM dist

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanUtils.java

2002-11-21 Thread billbarker
billbarker2002/11/21 20:44:10 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanUtils.java Log: Relaxing the restrictions on creating Valve MBeans. There is no functional change for Catalina Valves. For custom Valves, they only need to impleme

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Alexander Leyke wrote: >>I used BootstrapService because it didn't create the 8005 shutdown >>socket. My tests were done with 4.0. >>You can create your own wrapper, use CatalinaService directly or >>call Bootstrap ( if you don't mind 8005 - in your case it doesn't >>matter too much since you'll h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14282] - mod_jk/ajp13 returns wrong response after bad chunk-encoding request

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2002-11-21 Thread Alexander Leyke
Costin Manolache wrote: I used BootstrapService because it didn't create the 8005 shutdown socket. My tests were done with 4.0. You can create your own wrapper, use CatalinaService directly or call Bootstrap ( if you don't mind 8005 - in your case it doesn't matter too much since you'll have a s

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Alexander Leyke wrote: >>You can configure a different starter ( TomcatStarter did work >>with an older version of BootstrapService - now you can't use >>the 4.1 version of BS without daemon ). You can probably try >>to just configure it to use o.a.catalina.startup.Bootstrap. >>( or a different st

Re: [DONATION] procrun

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Looks good. Is this your code ( or code you have copyright to ) ? >> >> IMO the best way would be to make a proposal and add it to j-t-c, >> it seems very related with the jk_nt_service and mod_jk jni mode. >> >> If you want it to be a standalon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14722] - Missing/invalid string resource for StandardSession

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2002-11-21 Thread Alexander Leyke
Costin Manolache wrote: In jk2, all those strings are eliminated ( from C side ), we also eliminate the buffer allocation ( we reuse the same jbyteArray and C array, with code to eventually support NIO - that cuts 2 memcpy and few other small things ). We also reduce the number of JNI calls to

Re: [DONATION] procrun

2002-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: Looks good. Is this your code ( or code you have copyright to ) ? IMO the best way would be to make a proposal and add it to j-t-c, it seems very related with the jk_nt_service and mod_jk jni mode. If you want it to be a standalone and separated program - I think it woul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14736] - Unable to set servlet init parameters from web.xml and application context

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14736] - Unable to set servlet init parameters from web.xml and application context

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: howto extend catalina with mbeans

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Jakob Praher wrote: >> Right now catalina can be extended with Valves or connectors or >> listeners. >> Some of them (like jk connector ) can define MBeans. The major problem >> is having the admin interface recognize them - it should work >> but I never tried. > > I'll have to look at them. >

Re: howto extend catalina with mbeans

2002-11-21 Thread Jakob Praher
Am Don, 2002-11-21 um 19.29 schrieb Costin Manolache: > The solution is not yet very well defined. yup. I have experienced the same. > > Right now catalina can be extended with Valves or connectors or listeners. > Some of them (like jk connector ) can define MBeans. The major problem > is havin

Re: howto extend catalina with mbeans

2002-11-21 Thread Jakob Praher
Am Don, 2002-11-21 um 19.29 schrieb Costin Manolache: > The solution is not yet very well defined. yup. I have experienced the same. > > Right now catalina can be extended with Valves or connectors or listeners. > Some of them (like jk connector ) can define MBeans. The major problem > is havin

RE: [DONATION] procrun

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DONATION] procrun > > > Looks good. Is this your code ( or code you have copyright to ) ? > My own. > IMO the

Re: JK2 module for AOLserver

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Alexander Leyke wrote: >>The JNI channel is special because it is single-threaded ( a doors channel >>will use the same type of code ), and that has some implications in >>how the request is processed - but the data encoding is the same. >> >> > Does it mean that in-process worker is a performan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14741] - TagFiles with same name in different tag directories overwrite the generated java files

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [TOMCAT] Disabling Server shutdown port?

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 I don't know if this is known - the socket channel has a feature to specify a "range" - if the port is taken it'll try the next one. This allows a single config file to be used for a pool of tomcats ( i.e. simpler config for load-balancing ). Costin Mladen Turk wrote: > > >> -Origin

Re: howto extend catalina with mbeans

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
The solution is not yet very well defined. Right now catalina can be extended with Valves or connectors or listeners. Some of them (like jk connector ) can define MBeans. The major problem is having the admin interface recognize them - it should work but I never tried. I already committed some

Re: Tagging JK2_2_0_2

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 I'll try to add a bit more documentation ( and re-test ) the config stuff ( reloading etc ) as well as the chunked fix. Costin Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > There has been lots of changes since 2.0.1 like: > > - Regular expressions for uri mapping > - Duplicating global directives > - Fixin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14741] - TagFiles with same name in different tag directories overwrite the generated java files

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [DONATION] procrun

2002-11-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Looks good. Is this your code ( or code you have copyright to ) ? IMO the best way would be to make a proposal and add it to j-t-c, it seems very related with the jk_nt_service and mod_jk jni mode. If you want it to be a standalone and separated program - I think it would be better to propose it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14282] - mod_jk/ajp13 returns wrong response after bad chunk-encoding request

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c

2002-11-21 Thread costin
costin 2002/11/21 09:58:35 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c Log: Same fix for jk2. Don't send initial chunk for chunked encoding. The reason the data is sent for POST - in almost all cases tomcat will read it ( required by the spec - to process the data ). This wa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2002-11-21 Thread costin
costin 2002/11/21 09:53:48 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: Do not send the initial chunk for chunked encoding ( only for regular POST ). Ajp13 servers ( tomcat x.y, etc ) expect this initial chunk only if a content-length is specified. ( this is just an ini

RE: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread John Trollinger
Well d/l optimizeit and realized it would take a few weeks for me to understand what it is trying to tell me.. > Just to double check against tomcat 4.1.12, the memory usage > seems normal to me John. After tomcat starts up, it is using > 23megs. My webapp loads when tomcat starts up, so you

Re: JkCoyoteHandler does not respect port attribute inserver.xml

2002-11-21 Thread Jeff Tulley
This has been fixed, I think. There was a checkin by Costin to jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java - on 30/Oct/2001 So, I'm guessing that means Catalina 4.1.14 or so? Jeff Tulley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (801)861-5322 Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.nove

RE: Tagging JK2_2_0_2

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > > I remember that a FIONBIO was causing me some problems it > seems there is a #if 0 #endif So the code between is not used > any more. Could we remove it? > Yes... That was my invention after all (blocking blocked socket) ;-). /* When a socket is created, it

Re: Tagging JK2_2_0_2

2002-11-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, There has been lots of changes since 2.0.1 like: - Regular expressions for uri mapping - Duplicating global directives - Fixing POST on JNI - etc... I'm planning to tag the JK2 on Monday 25th. Any objections to that? I remember that a FIONBIO was causing me some proble

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c

2002-11-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: That's like you said ... ;) Is there a Java implementation withouth threads? I do not think so. If not then, we should disable jni for non-threaded apr. Make that dependent of HAVE_JNI. There is no need to compile in the JNI for non-threaded servers. Yes. But that is even

RE: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread John Trollinger
This is the examples with the install.. What I don't understand is why there is a difference when compiled vs uncompiled and the diff is always there. When we run our tests if our jsp pages are uncompiled the diff is about 170 meg.. That is what causes me to be a little nervous. I will try optim

Re: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread peter lin
This is from the examples jsp right? or are they from your webapp? the latest optimizeit has a leak finder feature. you may want to download the trail version and give it a shot. from the data it looks like a lot of objects are promoted to old memory from heap. It doesn't necessarily constitute a

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
That's like you said ... ;) Is there a Java implementation withouth threads? If not then, we should disable jni for non-threaded apr. Make that dependent of HAVE_JNI. There is no need to compile in the JNI for non-threaded servers. Or simply... #ifndef APR_HAS_THREADS #error You will need to ena

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14742] New: - jsp:setProperty mangles character set with param=

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c jk_channel_un.c jk_logger_file.c

2002-11-21 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/11/21 08:23:59 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_socket.c jk_channel_un.c jk_logger_file.c Log: Add FD_CLOEXEC to prevent log file and sockets beeing opened in a son process. Submitted by Martin Kraemer. Revision ChangesPath 1.45

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14741] New: - TagFiles with same name in different tag directories overwrite the generated java files

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread John Trollinger
When I run the examples with -verbose:gc this is what I get (just the snippits at the end) >From uncompiled jsp pages [GC 14707K->13665K(28412K), 0.0059002 secs] [GC 15521K->15518K(28412K), 0.0128997 secs] [GC 17374K->16086K(28412K), 0.0092266 secs] [GC 17942K->16258K(28412K), 0.0086307 secs] [G

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c

2002-11-21 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/11/21 08:08:32 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c Log: Allow no-threaded APR. - But no-threaded APR won't work anyway - Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_jni.c Index: jk_worker_jni.c

Re: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread peter lin
Just to double check against tomcat 4.1.12, the memory usage seems normal to me John. After tomcat starts up, it is using 23megs. My webapp loads when tomcat starts up, so your numbers may be lower. The system has 256megs of memory and 750mhz cpu. after I I hit all the pages in /examples/jsp/

howto extend catalina with mbeans

2002-11-21 Thread Jakob Praher
hi all, first of all kudos for the 4.1.x release - working with jmx is simply great ;-) I have a question, how to best extend catalina through jmx: for instance I have a special connector mbean or adaptor mbean, that I want to load into catalina. is there a way (for instance in the server.xml c

Re: Tagging JK2_2_0_2

2002-11-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, There has been lots of changes since 2.0.1 like: - Regular expressions for uri mapping - Duplicating global directives - Fixing POST on JNI - etc... I'm planning to tag the JK2 on Monday 25th. Any objections to that? I have some patches to commit. I will mail when I ha

[DONATION] procrun

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, I would like to donate the following code to the Apache community. The main reason for that is missing of decent service dispatcher for the Tomcat. The application can be run either as a service, console application, dll, or windows application. Needs some work and testing, but it can be IMO

Re: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread peter lin
that is unusual. I've done baseline performance tests with the standard examples and haven't seen that kind of behavior with 4.1.10-12. Can you start tomcat with verbose:gc and see what kind of output you're getting. Just because the memory allocated to Java is 58megs at the end, it doesn't mean

Tagging JK2_2_0_2

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, There has been lots of changes since 2.0.1 like: - Regular expressions for uri mapping - Duplicating global directives - Fixing POST on JNI - etc... I'm planning to tag the JK2 on Monday 25th. Any objections to that? Also we still need to do a lot of work on the docs (hope that John will h

Re: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread Holger Brozio
I think we should define memory leak. During the precompilation of the jsp pages, the resulting class files are also loaded by the classloader. This means of course, that the memory size increases. It is up to the garbage collector to remove the loaded classes from memory. In other words, it depen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14165] - Deleting a directory with compiled jsp pages causes FileNotFoundException on recompile

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14165] - Deleting a directory with compiled jsp pages causes FileNotFoundException on recompile

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Javac memory leak

2002-11-21 Thread John Trollinger
Ok, I did some testing running 4.1.14 as a service... Now my knowledge of memory management is not so good so this might mean nothing. When running as a service if I goto every example jsp page (the examples that come with the install) Compiled Memory starts at 37872 and ends at 39048 Not comp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14165] - Deleting a directory with compiled jsp pages causes FileNotFoundException on recompile

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14165] - Deleting a directory with compiled jsp pages causes FileNotFoundException on recompile

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14165] - Deleting a directory with compiled jsp pages causes FileNotFoundException on recompile

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14736] New: - Unable to set servlet init parameters from web.xml and application context

2002-11-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Does anyone care....

2002-11-21 Thread Steven Velez
OK... I will put the jk2 connector on my development machine and merge the changes at my next opportunity. Thanks again for your help. .-.| Steven Velez oo|| Software Engineer /`'\| alventive (\_;/) | 678-202-2226 -Original Message-

RE: [TOMCAT] Disabling Server shutdown port?

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > You should use the BootstrapService class instead of > Bootstrap. Silly me ... ;-(. What about ChannelSocket can it be disabled too ? Something like: public void init() throws IOException { // Fin

Re: [TOMCAT] Disabling Server shutdown port?

2002-11-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Can we disable the server shutdown port? I was thinking if I set the port to 0, then the StandardServer shouldn't create the shutdown socket. The reason for that is cause the embedded TC doesn't really need that if the JNI is the only communication channel. Server could be

[TOMCAT] Disabling Server shutdown port?

2002-11-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Can we disable the server shutdown port? I was thinking if I set the port to 0, then the StandardServer shouldn't create the shutdown socket. The reason for that is cause the embedded TC doesn't really need that if the JNI is the only communication channel. Server could be shut down from 'insi

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2002-11-21 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hgomez 2002/11/21 01:42:36 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml Log: No timeout to be set in AJP13 connector, it's the webserver responsability to drop unused connections Revision ChangesPath 1.65 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalin

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2002-11-21 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2002/11/21 01:42:36 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml Log: No timeout to be set in AJP13 connector, it's the webserver responsability to drop unused connections Revision ChangesPath 1.65 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf/server.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/confinstall server_2.xml

2002-11-21 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2002/11/21 01:39:41 Modified:resources/confinstall server_2.xml Log: No timeout to be set in AJP13 connector, it's the webserver responsability to drop unused connections Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/confinstall/server_

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelSocket.java

2002-11-21 Thread hgomez
hgomez 2002/11/21 01:32:17 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelSocket.java Log: Report timeout exception as such Revision ChangesPath 1.27 +7 -7 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/ChannelSocket.java Index: ChannelSocket.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include jk_bean.h

2002-11-21 Thread mturk
mturk 2002/11/21 01:03:39 Modified:jk/native2/include jk_bean.h Log: Get rid of the one-shot worker initialization scheme. It doesn't work as it should, and it slows down the load balacer. Once when service channel will be introduced it will take care of that. Revision Ch

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c jk_channel_jni.c jk_channel.c

2002-11-21 Thread mturk
mturk 2002/11/21 01:03:18 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c jk_channel_jni.c jk_channel.c Log: Get rid of the one-shot worker initialization scheme. It doesn't work as it should, and it slows down the load balacer. Once when service channel will

Re: [JK2] jni channel doesn't send POST data (WAS: [JK2] Apache2add read-ahead for POST data)

2002-11-21 Thread jean-frederic clere
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache It's most likely a bug. I know Nacho is using JNI with IIS - and the code looks fine. Yeah, it was... Just fixed it in the cvs. We were sending reply msg and the handler was feeding post msg. Oops I fill a bit guilty for