DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java

billbarker2002/10/04 00:03:09 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java Log: Use Craig's URL class to from the redirect request. This gives us normalisation as well as freeing us from unwanted protocols. Revision Change

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

I also agree that Tomcat should support as many platform as possible regardless of its J2SE version according to the philosophy of Java. Definitely Servlet 2.4 API wants Java 2(i.e. J2SE 1.2 or later), so it is enough for Tomcat to require at least J2SE 1.2 essentially. The problem is JSP 2.0. I

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

To clarify - my main concern is the second part of 'write once, run everywhere'. Right now JDK1.4 is just not 'everywhere', and I don't think any cool feature would justify sacrificing this. At this moment the 'everywhere' is defined ( at least IMO ) by the free VMs ( kaffe, GCJ, etc ) - just l

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution > Costin Manolache wrote: > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > > > > >>Hi all, > >>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java

billbarker2002/10/03 20:36:27 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java Log: Change the URL from Java's to Craig's. This mea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13084] - jsp compilation with jikes fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>Before starting to release 5.0.x milestones, I would like to propose >>having only one distribution for Tomcat 5.0.x, and standardize on what >>the LE distribution contains (so well, it's more the other distribution >>which gets

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

Some reference is here: http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/jsp/ JavaServer PagesTM 2.0 Preview Implementation Early Access v1.0 which is based on Tomcat 4.1 requires J2SDK 1.4. -Original Message- From: iasandcb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13270] New: - Container's AJP13 handler does not setTcpNoDelay on accept

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

You can find the requirement of J2SE 1.4 on Page 18, "Relation To JSP 1.2" Requiring the Java 2 platform, version 1.4 or later. and Page 20, "Related Documents" Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.4 in JSP 2.0 spec proposed final draft PDF document. (I also replie

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

I also agree with you on the fact that JSP 2.0 spec doesn't mention about any detailed relationship between JSP 2.0 and J2SE 1.4. The spec and other related documents (JSR-152 official page) states possilbe use of NIO from J2SE 1.4 for better performance. I imagine a new generation Java web conta

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

You can find the JSP 2.0 requirement of J2SE 1.4 on Page 18, "Relation To JSP 1.2" Requiring the Java 2 platform, version 1.4 or later. and Page 20, "Related Documents" Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.4 I have been very concerned with this requirement since J

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java

luehe 2002/10/03 17:30:48 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime PageContextImpl.java Log: PageContext.removeAttribute(name, scope) and PageContext.getAttributeNamesInScope(scope) now throw IllegalArgumentException when being passed an inv

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12558] - Unable to capture fragment evaluation in a Writer if the fragment writes to the default 'out'

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime BodyContentImpl.java JspContextWrapper.java PageContextImpl.java

luehe 2002/10/03 16:50:11 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime BodyContentImpl.java JspContextWrapper.java PageContextImpl.java Log: Fixed 125

cvs commit: jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr154/src/share/dtd j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd j2ee_1_4.xsd web-app_2_4.xsd web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd

kinman 2002/10/03 16:01:44 Modified:jsr152/src/share/dtd web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp JspContext.java PageContext.java jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/el ELException.java Ex

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13223] - JSP pages in XML syntax do not compile properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 2:37 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java > Bill Barker wrote: > > >> I doesnt have any problems with redi

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/s erver JkMain.java

> De: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Costin Manolache > Enviado el: 3 de octubre de 2002 23:40 > > Ok.. this should be fixed too, but i doenst understand why > it works for > > me using Coyote/JK2.. because i have the JSSE jars on my > ext dir simply? > > Are you using JDK1.4 ( in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12346] - Constant Refreshes crash "Framed" Web Applications in TOMCAT

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

[PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-5: javadocs, API changes and new file

NEW FILE (in jakarta-servletapi-5.newfiles.tar): - jsr154/src/share/dtd/j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd (Required by latest j2ee_1_4.xsd) CHANGED FILES: jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/JspContext.java: - getAttribute(name): Remove IllegalArgumentException for non-existent s

Re: please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file

Look here, http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-dbcp/v1.0/ On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 17:44, Shih, John wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I like to use DBCP to connect to Oracle JDBC driver. > > Would you please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file? So I can put > it in

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/s erver JkMain.java

Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: >> De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Enviado el: 3 de octubre de 2002 22:52 > > >> It seems that o.a.c.tomcat4/5.CoyoteResponse is using >> java.net.URL instead >> of Craig's o.a.c.u.URL or (the same class for 3.3) >> o.a.t.u.net.URL. AFAIK, >> changing the

Fwd: Weird seg fault on Mac OS X for mod_jk2 + Apache2

On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Costin Manolache wrote: >> Command:httpd >> PID:853 >> >> Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) >> Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS (0x0001) at 0x736f0028 >> >> Thread 0 Crashed: >> #0 0x90001600 in strlen >> #1 0x900023e0 in vfprintf

please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file

Dear Sir, I like to use DBCP to connect to Oracle JDBC driver. Would you please show me how to download the DBCP API jar file? So I can put it into $CATALINA_HOME/common/lib DBCP uses the Jakarta-Commons Database Connection Pool. It relies on number of Jakarta-Commons componenets: Jakarta-Comm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13264] - JspWriter.clear()/clearBuffer() doesn't reset the remaining buffer size as returned by JspWriter.getRemaining().

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

Bill Barker wrote: >> I doesnt have any problems with redirs with Coyote/jk2 using https in >> IIS, AFAIK the only use URL class had, was to try to get a absolute RUL >> or something like that, with a Method Craig did many time ago this >> should be unnecssary... >> >> I wonder how do you did the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13264] New: - JspWriter.clear()/clearBuffer() don't reset the remaining buffer size as returned by JspWriter.getRemaining().

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13263] - javax.servlet.request.key_size not following servlet spec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13263] New: - javax.servlet.request.key_size not following servlet spec

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

SSL Client-Auth

Hi. I have been looking into a problem with Tomcat5, ClientAuth=false, and JSSE in JDK1.4 and it seems like the JSSE has a problem. Namely if you build an SSL socket, then later decide you need to exchange certs with the client (ie. CLIENT-CERT), then the SSlSocket.startHandshake() m

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

> De: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 3 de octubre de 2002 22:52 > It seems that o.a.c.tomcat4/5.CoyoteResponse is using > java.net.URL instead > of Craig's o.a.c.u.URL or (the same class for 3.3) > o.a.t.u.net.URL. AFAIK, > changing the import statement in CoyoteResponse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13223] - JSP pages in XML syntax do not compile properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

- Original Message - From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:36 PM Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java > I doesnt have any problems with re

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:14 pm, Henri Gomez wrote: > Steve Downey wrote: > > Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able > > to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a > > complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't us

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

I doesnt have any problems with redirs with Coyote/jk2 using https in IIS, AFAIK the only use URL class had, was to try to get a absolute RUL or something like that, with a Method Craig did many time ago this should be unnecssary... I wonder how do you did the tests? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13144] - Scriplet comment breaks JSPs silently

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13004] - Error in page compilation when comment is place at the end of scriptlet and the scriptlet is the last line in the jsp page.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13258] New: - During form-based authentication a POST turns into a GET

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution > iasandcb wrote: > > > First all, I vote > > > > +1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution > > -1 [

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13144] - Scriplet comment breaks JSPs silently

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10267] - Comments in scriptlets break subsequent sections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13144] - Scriplet comment breaks JSPs silently

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

+1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions But...The only problem I see is the Xerces version included in 1.3 doesn't support XML Schema. So if people turn on validation, the parser will not work for Servlet 2.4/JSP 2.0I recommend we make it clear in the i

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/mx DynamicMBeanProxy.java

costin 2002/10/03 12:34:47 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/mx DynamicMBeanProxy.java Log: A fix in the object name ( ',' needs to be used as separator ). Also added unregister - need for reloads. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +19 -5 jakarta-tomcat-conn

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:30:47 -0700 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution > > iasandcb wrote: > > > Fi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

kinman 2002/10/03 12:29:38 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: - Fix 13144. Revision ChangesPath 1.105 +4 -3 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java Index: Generator.java ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java

costin 2002/10/03 12:31:31 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java Log: If only Ajp connector is used, nobody will initialize the https: handler and redirects for https sites will fail ( a URL constructor is used somewhere ). PR: 11657 Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTEC

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

kinman 2002/10/03 12:25:19 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: tomcat_4_branch Generator.java Log: - Fix 13144: Ending comment eats up line following. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13256] New: - jk2.socket not created in 4.1.12 connector

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 09:14 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: > Steve Downey wrote: >> Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be >> able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as >> to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13223] - JSP pages in XML syntax do not compile properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

iasandcb wrote: > First all, I vote > > +1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution > -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions > > > Next, I'd like to make this clear: Tomcat 5 is based on JSP 2.0 spec, > which requires J2SE 1.4. Therefore Tomcat 5 also can't run without J2SE > 1.4 ideally. However, I fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13254] - Page compilation errors missing resource entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13254] New: - Page compilation errors missing resource entries

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13223] - JSP pages in XML syntax do not compile properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13223] - JSP pages in XML syntax do not compile properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

Oops! sorry, I missed my vote. +1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions -Original Message- From: iasandcb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:06 AM To: 'Tomcat Developers List' Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribu

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

First all, I vote +1 [ ] Yes, remove the LE distribution -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions Next, I'd like to make this clear: Tomcat 5 is based on JSP 2.0 spec, which requires J2SE 1.4. Therefore Tomcat 5 also can't run without J2SE 1.4 ideally. However, I found that the new catalina engine an

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:14 pm, Henri Gomez wrote: > Steve Downey wrote: > > Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able > > to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a > > complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't us

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi all, > > Before starting to release 5.0.x milestones, I would like to propose > having only one distribution for Tomcat 5.0.x, and standardize on what > the LE distribution contains (so well, it's more the other distribution > which gets removed). > > It has some adva

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c

jean-frederic clere wrote: >> :-) Sorry about 'horrible'. >> >> What I meant is - the elements like and almost everything >> else have an identical meaning as the standard XHTML or docbook element. >> It's a mix of elements - to do something that is already done and >> standard and accepted. >

RE: [PROPOSAL] Splitting docs for JK2

Mladen Turk wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >> +0 (Ok but can't help right now) > > Could you check: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/docs/ Looks good. Can you check in ? Henri: would you mind if we remove the reference to ajp14 ?

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 13:24, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > +1 [X] Yes, remove the LE distribution > -1 [ ] No, keep both distributions > simpler is better. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: > > > Henri Gomez wrote: > >> Steve Downey wrote: >> >>> Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be >>> able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as >>> to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doe

Re: Weird seg fault on Mac OS X for mod_jk2 + Apache2

Han Ming Ong wrote: > I added a super simple workers2.properties file in the same dir and > tried to start apache. I got a seg fault. Here's the stacktrace from > Mac OS X default crash logger: > > Command:httpd > PID:853 > > Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) > Codes: KERN_IN

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

[5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

Hi all, Before starting to release 5.0.x milestones, I would like to propose having only one distribution for Tomcat 5.0.x, and standardize on what the LE distribution contains (so well, it's more the other distribution which gets removed). It has some advantages: - it is slightly smaller (le

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteInputStream.java

costin 2002/10/03 10:20:52 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteInputStream.java coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteInputStream.java Log: Added available(). PR: 12870 Revision

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

Henri Gomez wrote: > Steve Downey wrote: > >> Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be >> able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as >> to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't >> use either directly. >> >> Xerce

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12870] - CoyoteInputStream does not implement the available() method

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13253] New: - Migration problems with Tomcat 4.1.10. Please help.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12694] - POST requests fail after server failover

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

remm2002/10/03 10:08:24 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Update to c-l 1.0.2 (and Ant 1.5.1 is now recommended for building Tomcat). Revision ChangesPath 1.39 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.defa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml

costin 2002/10/03 09:57:49 Modified:jk/xdocs index.xml jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml Log: Added the 'version' common property. Few addition and fixes in the description of jk2. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +23 -7 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xd

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

This causes all 181 Watchdog JSP tests to fail. I don't know why yet, and it's probably something simple, but it's not a good sign. On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > remm2002/10/03 05:56:39 > > Modified:.build.properties.default > Log: >

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime JspContextWrapper.java

luehe 2002/10/03 09:50:05 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime JspContextWrapper.java Log: Changed class comment Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +9 -5 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime/JspCont

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c

Costin Manolache wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: > > >>Costin Manolache wrote: >> >>>Mladen Turk wrote: >>> >>> >>> >-Original Message- >On Behalf Of Costin Manolache > >Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on >why/how :-) ? > > >>>

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13132] - missing declaration of variable

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13081] - ScriptingVariableVisitor#setScriptingVars does not account for scriptlet scopes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

Steve Downey wrote: > Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able to get > rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a complete > build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use either directly. > > Xerces is a different issue. There was

probably bug in JSP in tomcat 4.0.5??

hi, I got little problem with Tomcat 4.0.5 (I don't know if this version is still in develoment) it appears in taglibs, specially in JSP and i think it's bug.. before i report i'm asking you is it (I hope i'm wrong this time) It goes like this: i have this kind of tags: ShowContent

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2 configweb.xml configtc.xml

mturk 2002/10/03 08:34:10 Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configweb.xml configtc.xml Log: Add new splitted documents Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -592jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configweb.xml Index: configweb.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebex.xml configwebcom.xml configtcex.xml

mturk 2002/10/03 08:33:41 Added: jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebex.xml configwebcom.xml configtcex.xml Log: Add new splitted documents Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configwebex.xml Index: configwebex.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs menu.jk2.idx

mturk 2002/10/03 08:32:51 Modified:jk/xdocs menu.jk2.idx Log: Split the jk2 menu. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +12 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/menu.jk2.idx Index: menu.jk2.idx ===

Re: Is Compile Failure? was Re: Need some clarifications

Actually, with the recent release of commons-logging, we should be able to get rid of the explicit LogKit and Log4J. They're there so as to get a complete build of commons-logging. Tomcat 5 itself doesn't use either directly. Xerces is a different issue. There was a bug that was preventing Tomc

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Costin Manolache wrote: >> Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- On Behalf Of Costin Manolache Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on why/how :-) ? >>> >>>Sure, like everyone else ;). >> >> >> Ye

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13241] - Tomcat 4.1.12 / Webapps:Examples / Disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13173] - NPE thrown by ELException.toString() if not originally created with a root cause exception.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13164] - Compliance issue - VariableResolver.resolveVariable() fails to throw an ELException for an unresolvable variable.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13241] - Tomcat 4.1.12 / Webapps:Examples / Disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13241] - Tomcat 4.1.12 / Webapps:Examples / Disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

  1   2   >