cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans mbeans-descriptors.xml

amyroh 2002/09/04 18:57:19 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans mbeans-descriptors.xml Log: Add "swallowOutput" attribute to Context MBean. Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +6 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/context context.jsp

amyroh 2002/09/04 18:56:40 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_en.properties ApplicationResources_es.properties webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/context

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Amy, I was in the middle of reviewing the admin app when Remy called for the Tomcat 4.1.10 vote. I'll provide complete feedback when I have time to finish my review. Regards, Glenn Amy Roh wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >>> Glenn Nielsen wrote: >>> Remy Mauc

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Collector.java Generator.java Node.java

luehe 2002/09/04 16:45:29 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Collector.java Generator.java Node.java Log: Renamed "isHasXXX()" to "hasXXX()" Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12200] - Translation error thrown when accessing fragment scoped variables

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:48 AM Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java > bobh2002/09/04 11:48:08 > > Modified:coyote/sr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12322] New: - Port *.8080 in LISTEN state after tomcat shutdown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12107] - ContentType header value is set as null while using taglib/include directive

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler PageInfo.java Parser.java Validator.java

kinman 2002/09/04 15:54:54 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler PageInfo.java Parser.java Validator.java Log: - Fixed 12107: Null content type when a tag file is used. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +3 -12 jakarta-tomcat-jas

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12321] New: - StackOverflow Exception when a tag defined by a tag file is called within a tag file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12319] - Compile Error when a Classic Tag is nested in the jsp:attribute of a Simple Tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12318] - Compile Error when a Classic Tag is nested in the jsp:attribute of a Simple Tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12319] - Compile Error when a Classic Tag is nested in the jsp:attribute of a Simple Tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12318] New: - Compile Error when a Classic Tag is nested in the jsp:attribute of a Simple Tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12319] New: - Compile Error when a Classic Tag is nested in the jsp:attribute of a Simple Tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> Glenn Nielsen wrote: >> >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable >>

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java

bobh2002/09/04 11:54:02 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java Log: - Oops, fix the tabs (I also fixed my .emacs to preven

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java

bobh2002/09/04 11:48:08 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteResponse.java coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteResponse.java Log: - I noticed that RequestDumperValve was unhappy, so I

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider > releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. > > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable > Amy > > If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which > should be addres

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12310] New: - Problems with Cookie processing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12299] - Setting cookie doesn't work in all cases.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Problem with individual jars and Security Manager in TC4.1.10

Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade a production installation running TC 4.0.4 to lastest 4.1.10. So far, so good ( still using Jasper 1 ), but I think there is a problem with the configuration of catalina.policy for individual jar files. On catalina.policy it says to use: grant codeBase "jar:file

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12269] - body-content attribute of tag directive needs to be compared in a case insensitive manner

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java TagFileProcessor.java

kinman 2002/09/04 10:59:11 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java TagFileProcessor.java Log: - Fix 12269: accepts lower case body content types. Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12282] - NPE thrown when a tag defined by a tag file is specified as a fragment in the attribute of a tag defined by tag file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TagFileProcessor.java

luehe 2002/09/04 10:27:11 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler TagFileProcessor.java Log: Fixed 12282: NPE thrown when a tag defined by a tag file is specified as a fragment in the attribute of a tag defined by tag file

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11775] - Admin app looking for wrong attribute "user" in Data Sources config

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11826] - Error rthrown on Console after configuring Global JNDI resource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11826] - Error rthrown on Console after configuring Global JNDI resource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12110] - Database connection does not work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspUtil.java

luehe 2002/09/04 09:58:57 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspUtil.java Log: Added javadoc comment for toClass() method Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +9 -3 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspUtil.java

Errors for building mod_jk

Hi Experts, Greetings! I am using APache(1.3) and Tomcat (4.0.4) on IBM AIX (5.1) System. I am havin high time in integrating APache and Tomcat. Binary "mod_jk" is NOT available for IBM AIX System - so I try to build it using following procedure but get ERRORS. I tried to execute "./buildconf

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12283] - If a tag implementing SimpleTag is invoked within a tag file a NPE is thrown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java

luehe 2002/09/04 09:39:23 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java Log: Fixed 12283: If a tag implementing SimpleTag is invoked within a tag file a NPE is thrown Revision ChangesPath 1.88 +11 -7 jakarta-tomcat-jasper

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12307] - Fix > in docs to be > where appropriate

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12307] New: - Fix > in docs to be > where appropriate

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating

[ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable I only just installed 4.1.10 today. I hit a lot of problems with my existing apps that run fine on 4.0.3 because of this bug with jsp:param tags. Having a null value for a jsp:param value causes a NullPointerException. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11091] - Tomcat (4.1.7 - 4.1.9)-LE-jdk14 ignores error page specified in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

hmm... it was working well for me. Maybe it was a whitespace issue? At any rate your version should have essentially the same effect. -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:58 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12306] New: - Tomcat 4.1.10-LE-JDK14 admin webapp doesnt work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE : [vote] Possible logos for mod_jk documentation

back to the list. My vote goes for : mod_jk-logo5.jpg BTW, artwork contributions are welcomed so if you have some nice logos, just send them to the list. regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: > Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: > >> Sean Reilly wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I posted bug #11091 >>> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd. >>> Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is >>> still assigned to [E

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

bobh2002/09/04 08:53:49 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - fix url to xerces (not under "old_xereces2" dir anymore) Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.default =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11091] - Tomcat (4.1.7 - 4.1.9)-LE-jdk14 ignores error page specified in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12260] - Cannot access some contexts. WAR files do not run.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/bin jspc-using-launcher.bat

patrickl2002/09/04 08:32:53 Modified:jasper2/src/bin jspc-using-launcher.bat Log: Append %PATH% for all Windows platforms since the %0 DOS bug is not limited to Windows 9x platforms Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -7 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/bin/jspc-usi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin shutdown-using-launcher.bat startup-using-launcher.bat tool-wrapper-using-launcher.bat

patrickl2002/09/04 08:31:18 Modified:catalina/src/bin shutdown-using-launcher.bat startup-using-launcher.bat tool-wrapper-using-launcher.bat Log: Append %PATH% for all Windows platforms since the %0 DOS bug is not limited to Windows 9

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11091] - Tomcat (4.1.7 - 4.1.9)-LE-jdk14 ignores error page specified in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11091] - Tomcat (4.1.7 - 4.1.9)-LE-jdk14 ignores error page specified in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Volunteering

On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 10:00, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > Hi everyone > I'd like to volunteer to help with tomcat ;) I've been using it for a > while, read the Apache guidelines, looked at the source code a bit, and > been developing in Java for a few years. > > >From Remy's message, it sounds like

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

Remy, I don't think Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz is in old_xerces2. The URL should be http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-j/Xerces-J-bin.2.1.0.tar.gz. Dave > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 September 2002 14:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

[5] logout() and Basic Authentication

Hi, The Servlet 2.4 spec includes HttpSession.logout(). My question is, how should Tomcat handle a logout() when the webapp is using "Basic Authentication" ? Basic Authentication is described in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt Chapter 2. My assertion is: Once a remote user has logged in o

RE: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

Sean, The error still exists.. I fixed the directory structure and can get other exceptions to work fine, but when I though and map a javax.servlet.jsp.JspException it fails every time.. I think it happens before it checks to see where to forward the error as I have looked at that code in the j

RE: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

Here are the contents of the attachment. The directory structure is as follows: Error.jsp and test.jsp would be in the web-app's main directory web.xml goes in a WEB-INF subdirectory Sean -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wedn

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider > releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. > > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X ] Stable > From the DTD validation point of view, the performance seems better with Xerces 2.1 (informal t

Re: Abuse@verizon.net

jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > Each time I am replying a message of the list I am getting a message > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Advert or complain?). > > Has any one received this kind of message? I don't, but I suspect your mail server has been placed on a spam mail list and now monitor

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> Glenn Nielsen wrote: >> >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. [ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable >>

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config server.xml service.xml

glenn 2002/09/04 07:09:50 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config server.xml service.xml Log: Add docs for debug attribute Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +6 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/server.xml Index: server.xml ==

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Glenn Nielsen wrote: > >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >>> I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider >>> releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. >>> >>> >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [X] Beta >>> [ ] Stable >>> >>> >>> If not voting stable, ple

Volunteering

Hi everyone I'd like to volunteer to help with tomcat ;) I've been using it for a while, read the Apache guidelines, looked at the source code a bit, and been developing in Java for a few years. >From Remy's message, it sounds like maybe more people are needed to help with the admin webapp? I

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

remm2002/09/04 06:39:32 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Update to Xerces 2.1.0. Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.default ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 build.properties.sample

remm2002/09/04 06:38:50 Modified:.build.properties.sample Log: - Update to Xerces 2.1.0. Revision ChangesPath 1.50 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.properties.sample Index: build.properties.sample ===

Re: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

David Oxley wrote: > Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the > LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it). I plan to propose to get rid of the LE edition with 5.0.x. The idea would be that: - we bundle a parser, since not even the one included in JDK 1.4 would work

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Glenn Nielsen wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider >> releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. >> >> >> [ ] Alpha >> [X] Beta >> [ ] Stable >> >> >> If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of item

Re: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: > >> >> >> Hans Schmid wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 with the XML >>> Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 are currentzly >>> in the build system. >>> >>> Has anyone tried t

Re: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

David Oxley wrote: >Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the >LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it). > >Does Sun JDK1.4 come with Xerces or Crimson? I thought I read that it was >supplied with a version of Xerces, but the source that comes with it has >org.apac

Re: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: > > > Hans Schmid wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 with the XML >> Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 are currentzly >> in the build system. >> >> Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ? >>

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider > releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. > > > [ ] Alpha > [X] Beta > [ ] Stable > > > If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which > should be addressed bef

Re: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

Hans Schmid wrote: >Hi, > >as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 >with the XML Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 >are currentzly in the build system. > >Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ? > Yes, I have done some tesing and it works fine. I

RE: [TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

Also, you probably ought to include the XML parser (Xerces 2.1.0) with the LE edition of TC5 (If it does fix it). Does Sun JDK1.4 come with Xerces or Crimson? I thought I read that it was supplied with a version of Xerces, but the source that comes with it has org.apache.crimson. stuff in it.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12299] New: - Setting cookie doesn't work in all cases.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Hi, > >[ ] Alpha >[ ] Beta >[X] Stable > Stable. Been using it in our staging environment (exact copy of production) since the day it came out, without any problems. I agree that this has been the RC period. I don't think there are any showstopper bugs, and I don't think we'll get a lot more

[TC 5] XMLSchema validation and Xerces 2.1.0

Hi, as far as I understand, there are problems in Tomcat 5 with the XML Schema validation. A hack in Tomcat plus Xerces 2.0.1 are currentzly in the build system. Has anyone tried the new Xerces release 2.1.0 yet ? If 2.1.0 fixes the XML Schema problems it might be worth including it in Tomca

[Patch] Jasper2 4.1.10 added sets and gets for some vars

Changes for org.apache.jasper.JspC --- old/JspC.java 2002-08-21 13:56:03.0 -0400 +++ new/JspC.java2002-09-04 08:20:57.0 -0400 @@ -201,6 +201,18 @@ private boolean listErrors = false; private boolean showSuccess = false; +public void setListErrors(boolean b

Re: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: > Sean Reilly wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I posted bug #11091 >> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd. >> Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is >> still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> The recent test miles

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c

hgomez 2002/09/04 04:41:20 Modified:jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c Log: Corrected typo (missing ;) Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_jni_worker.c Index: jk_jni_worker.c ==

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

David Oxley wrote: > Remy, > > If people vote for stable will it be released as an 'rc' for a week or so > before being declared stable? The httpd project didn't do it AFAIK. Why would we ? You can consider the "RC period" is right now, also (the build is available to both devs and users). Re

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c

hgomez 2002/09/04 04:35:13 Modified:jk/native/common jk_jni_worker.c Log: First try to make use of JNI of iSeries (AS/400). We don't dynamically load the JVM libraries (dll/shared) but instead use it directly (mod_jk should be compiled with JVM SRVPGM). I'll have to fin

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h jk_connect.c jk_global.h jk_map.c jk_msg_buff.c jk_msg_buff.h jk_pool.c jk_pool.h jk_util.c

hgomez 2002/09/04 04:31:33 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c jk/native/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c jk_ajp_common.h jk_connect.c jk_global.h jk_map.c jk_msg_buff.c jk_msg_buff.h jk_pool.c jk_pool.h

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [ ] Alpha > [X] Beta > [ ] Stable > > > I think the 4.1.x is great however, I would like to see BUG#11662 resolved: >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662 > > The sharing of global resources is a great asset but cannot be fully utilised until >t

RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating

[ ] Alpha [X] Beta [ ] Stable I think the 4.1.x is great however, I would like to see BUG#11662 resolved: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662 The sharing of global resources is a great asset but cannot be fully utilised until the bug is resolved. Regards Asar Khan > --

Re: [5] [GUMP-PATCH] Make Tomcat 5 descriptor work (hopefully)

On 04 Sep 2002, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you would have gotten something like "Dropping project > jakarta-tomcat-5 as it depends on jakarta-site-5 which doesn't > exist" or similar. s/site/servletapi/ Stefan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additio

Re: [5] [GUMP-PATCH] Make Tomcat 5 descriptor work (hopefully)

On 03 Sep 2002, Bob Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, your changes to your changes have been checked in. I've seen it, thanks - and you'll be getting your first nag mail rather soon. > TC5 knows about all it's dependencies (see the "download" target in > TC5's build.xml), So there is q

RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating

Remy, If people vote for stable will it be released as an 'rc' for a week or so before being declared stable? Dave. > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 September 2002 09:59 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [4.1.10] Stability rating >

Re: [4.1.10] Stability rating

[ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable I think the 4.1.10 is better than the 4.0.4. Cheers Jean-frederic Remy Maucherat wrote: > I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider > releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. > > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable >

Re: Tomcat 4.1.10 and tag pooling problem

Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > I have been testing tomcat 4.1.10 with our web application, > which uses i18n tag from jakarta-taglibs. When running > it under 4.1.10 with jsp default settings in web.xml it > produces very odd results - it seems that each i18n tag > return same string to page (the s

Tomcat 4.1.10 and tag pooling problem

Hi, I have been testing tomcat 4.1.10 with our web application, which uses i18n tag from jakarta-taglibs. When running it under 4.1.10 with jsp default settings in web.xml it produces very odd results - it seems that each i18n tag return same string to page (the string might be the one the first

[4.1.10] Stability rating

I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line. [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which should be addressed before a milestone can be released as stable. T

mod_webapp.so & upload

Hello, I realised à webmail in JSP/Servlet on Linux RedHat 7.2 / Apache 1.3.26 / Tomcat 4.0.1 and I've a problem... I can't upload file to the server. This is a bug of the connector mod_webapp.so (method toRead() return char between -128 to 127 instead of 0 to 255 http://nagoya.apache.org/bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12286] New: - NullPointerException in JDBCStore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Bug 11091 has now been untouched for over a month

Sean Reilly wrote: > Hi, > > I posted bug #11091 > (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11091) on July 23rd. > Since then, nobody besides myself has posted a comment to it, and it is > still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The recent test milestone (4.1.10) released on August 30th d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12285] - jsp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12285] - jsp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12285] - package

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12285] New: - package

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12249] - tomcat binds to IP addresses it is configured not to bind to

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Abuse@verizon.net

Hi, Each time I am replying a message of the list I am getting a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Advert or complain?). Has any one received this kind of message? Is someone not receiving my replies? (last was on topic: "Making A Donation (mod_jk for Mac OS X)"). Cheers Jean-frederic -- To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12249] - tomcat binds to IP addresses it is configured not to bind to

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [4.1.10] New test milestone released

Jan Luehe wrote: > Costin, > > >>Something like: >> >> >> >>"> >> >>It'll fist generate a duplicated declaration ( once at top level, >>once at block level ) for _jspx_sub_1, and then look for a >>variable named 'sub' that is not declared. > > > I am unable to reproduce your problem. The ab

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12260] - Cannot access some contexts. WAR files do not run.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

  1   2   >