jasper package

2002-08-18 Thread Yunfeng Hou
Jasper has command line option to set package name, but not true for JspServlet, I made some change to give user a chance to set the packageName in the servlet init parameter. What I have done is add getPackageName to Options class, modify JspServlet and ClassLoader to recognize this parameter, r

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/examples/WEB-INF/classes/sessions DummyCart.java

2002-08-18 Thread billbarker
billbarker2002/08/18 20:28:41 Modified:src/examples/WEB-INF/classes/sessions DummyCart.java Log: Make session value Serializable. With this, the session example makes a good test case for Context reloading. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat/s

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread costinm
I think the relevant section is 4.2 - and it says: It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one "field-name: field-value" pair, without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each separated by a comma. So g

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread Steve Downey
On Sunday 18 August 2002 11:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My understanding - the HTTP spec doesn't ( and can't ) define a complete > list of headers supporting multiple values. That's impossible given that > additional headers are supported. > The spec does exactly that. It enumerates the pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11805] - admin webapp supports only MemoryRealm

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10629] - include directive fails when referencing Parent Path within a WAR

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11802] - jsp:include causes an error when working directly from war

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11805] New: - admin webapp supports only MemoryRealm

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread costinm
My understanding - the HTTP spec doesn't ( and can't ) define a complete list of headers supporting multiple values. That's impossible given that additional headers are supported. If the servlet spec requires getHeader() to return the 'concatenated value for multi-headers' - then the spec can't b

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Steve Downey wrote: > On Sunday 18 August 2002 08:39 am, Remy Maucherat wrote: > >>Yes, it is right. >> >>Consider: >>H: A, B >> >>In that case, getHeader() has to return "A, B" since it is not known if >>this header is comma separated, as per the spec definition. >> > > > Ah. That's where we'r

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread Steve Downey
On Sunday 18 August 2002 08:39 am, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Steve Downey wrote: > > On Saturday 17 August 2002 01:40 pm, Remy Maucherat wrote: > >>Steve Downey wrote: > > > > > > > >>>The real problem, for the servlet spec implementation, is that not just > >>>getHeaders() is affected. getHeader()

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11798] - use of response.flushBuffer in .jsp script results in unterminated HTTP response/ browser hangs

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Watchdog aggregation of headers may be incorrect

2002-08-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Steve Downey wrote: > On Saturday 17 August 2002 01:40 pm, Remy Maucherat wrote: > >>Steve Downey wrote: > > > >>>The real problem, for the servlet spec implementation, is that not just >>>getHeaders() is affected. getHeader() must be also. getHeader, if there >>>are multiple values, needs to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11802] - jsp:include causes an error when working directly from war

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11802] New: - jsp:include causes an error when working directly from war

2002-08-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b