DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8339] New: - Request.getInputStream() has no data

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Bill Barker wrote: > Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:16:40 -0700 > From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence > > > > > Now, m

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Request.java

2002-04-20 Thread billbarker
billbarker02/04/20 22:56:11 Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Request.java Log: Make get/setAttribute final here. The API is such that you should expect problems with overriding these. Now it will fail at compile time if you try. Revision ChangesPath 1.114

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat33 Ajp14Interceptor.java

2002-04-20 Thread billbarker
billbarker02/04/20 22:51:20 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat33 Ajp14Interceptor.java Log: Removing the get/setAttribute overloads. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +20 -15 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat33/Ajp14Interceptor.java Index:

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Bill Barker
> > Now, maybe I'm alone thinking this, but I would be happy if you omitted > stuff like "F**K", "S**T" or anything related from the emails you post on > this list. You probably are. :-) As you can see below, you are also grossly mis-representing what Pier actually wrote (by implying that he vio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8332] - missing mod_jk source for apache2.0 or all mod_jk sources

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors gump.xml

2002-04-20 Thread larryi
larryi 02/04/20 20:41:03 Modified:.gump.xml Log: Since later projects try to build J-T-C util with jsse, ensure the gump project does so as well. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/gump.xml Index: gump.xml ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8318] - class not found for: org.apache.cocoon.servlet.CocoonServlet

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8097] - Tomcat 4.0x can not be shut down if RMI registry is running

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7809] - content type directive that in included jsp files take no effects

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7787] - JSPs don't write cookies except with specific IP address

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7656] - Webapplications deployed using PUT don't survive a tomcat restart

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7640] - JDBC connection and transaction related

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7078] - Session created in https not valid for http

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6670] - AuthenticatorBase uses StandardContext

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8336] - BSOD

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8336] - BSOD

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8337] New: - BSOD Appears when accessing JSP or Servlet through Apache connector

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PATCH] TagCache writers fix

2002-04-20 Thread Bart Locanthi
The attached patch fixes a problem where tomcat is unable to find writer methods in user-defined tags. The problem appears in at least SUN jdk's 1.3 and 1.4 - I haven't looked at the IBM jdk. The original code is simply broken - it looks for all writers and somehow disqualifies legitimate one

Re: patch for tomcat rc script in RPM

2002-04-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Hi, Please note that : * the /etc/init.d used in tomcat rpms right now intentionnaly moved all variable definitions to /etc/tomcat3/conf/tomcat3.conf, so people could redefine them in a configuration file rpm would not replace after each upd

[third version] new dtomcat3

2002-04-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Ok, I think I've finished with the obvious fixes today:) Here it comes... -- Nicolas Mailhot #!/bin/sh # # $Id: tomcat.sh,v 1.32 2002/01/31 03:58:13 larryi Exp $ # Shell script to start and stop the server # There are other, simpler commands to startup the runner. The two #

RE: [JPackage-devel] RE: Duplicate code in dtomcat

2002-04-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Sorry for being a bit too fast -> Same script with some obvious cleanups Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot #!/bin/sh # # $Id: tomcat.sh,v 1.32 2002/01/31 03:58:13 larryi Exp $ # Shell script to start and stop the server # There are other, simpler commands to startup the runner. The two # comment

RE: [JPackage-devel] RE: Duplicate code in dtomcat

2002-04-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Hi, I've fixed my new dtomcat3 ; I won't say I've tested everything but it seems to work and is already (IMHO) much saner than the old one. Anyway not having an if-then-else running half the script will certainly make it much easier to maintain. I've axed the help for fe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8336] New: - BSOD

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Apache 2.0 + warpConnection: redirect for does not work

2002-04-20 Thread Cavan Morris
I'm running apache 2.0 over tomcat 4.0.2 with mod_webapp. I have a virtual host set up for my domain in apache and SSL configured on port 443 for that host. I have the standalone tomcat server on port 8080 as well. All of those thing seem to work fine. The problem is with the following and

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_logger_apache2.c

2002-04-20 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/20 15:57:16 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_map.c jk/native2/include jk_service.h jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_logger_apache2.c Log: * Cometic fixes less warnings * Some function definition fixes for win32 * ifdef not needed for win32 fi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c

2002-04-20 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/20 15:53:43 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_apr_socket.c Log: * Fxing some Unix sockets code without ifdef Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_channel_apr_socket.c Index: jk_channel_apr_socket

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp

2002-04-20 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/20 15:51:52 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi isapi.dsp Log: * Fixed Isapi release build Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +8 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/isapi.dsp Index: isapi.dsp ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk build.properties.sample

2002-04-20 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/20 15:51:10 Modified:jk/native2 build.xml jk build.properties.sample Log: * Fixed IIS ant build * Added Miscrosoft SDK properties for includes and libs Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +19 -14jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/bui

So, Google uses Tomcat and Apache SOAP...

2002-04-20 Thread Paulo Gaspar
http://www.beblogging.com/blog/20020417-221452 Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Christopher K. St. John
Remy Maucherat wrote: > > It has been developed separately (by you alone), with > zero input from the Tomcat community > Good grief Remy, it _was_ discussed on tomcat-dev, as a quick search of the archives will show. You're spouting complete BS here, and I wish you wouldn't. You're also obvio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8332] New: - missing mod_jk source for apache2.0 or all mod_jk sources

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8331] New: - When using mod_webapp apache 2.0.35 fails to start

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-4.0

2002-04-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: deploy-static: deploy:

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > But what you are doing is a fork by all definitions that > > I know. > > > > It's an alternative implementation of some of the Catalina > interfaces, but it's clearly not a fork. I'm using this as a > working definition: A fork refers to what you do in a revisio

Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence

2002-04-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The only problem I see, is NOT discussing MinTC issues on tomcat-dev - > > I wholeheartedly agree with this. MinTC issues are not discussed around > here, while I would love to follow its development (darn, not enough time?). > > Actually, I do ca

Re: [PATCH] possible speed enhancement to JspServlet.java

2002-04-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
> I'm new to this list (and the jasper code), so please let me know if I've > submitted this incorrectly. > I was doing some profiling of the server side environment that I work on > and noticed that quite a bit of time was being used in the JSP engine. After > further investigation I noticed that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8328] New: - webdav with User Directories do not work

2002-04-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu