On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 03:19:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Vicent, Forrest,
>
> Thanks for the patch & review.
>
> Could you summarize and/or expand a bit :-) ?
The changes I made affect two uses of the concept of Character encodings:
1 what's being sent to the browser (ie in Jsp
I've been asked to provide more information, so here is combination of
the two messages I posted with some more commentary and attachments.
It pertains to Tomcat-3.2.1 and looks to be the same in 3.2.2.b4. I'm
running Apache 1.3.17 on Win 2K Professional. I'm also using mod_jk
I have some cli
Vicent, Forrest,
Thanks for the patch & review.
Could you summarize and/or expand a bit :-) ?
Also, does anyone played with the various browsers ? Is any browser
sending the charset encoding ? What format ?
I know that some browsers are encoding the URL with the same charset that
is used in
> Well, first it shouldn't be just plain "uri":
>
>
> /myPRlibrary
> /WEB-INF/tlds/PRlibrary_1_4.tld
>
Are you referring to an entry in the web.xml file?
I was asking about having multiple Tag Library Descriptors in a JAR.
According the the JSP 1.2 pfd anything in the META-INF directory with t
+0 (I don't think I'll have time to do any support), but way to go Marc!!!
-Dan
Marc Saegesser wrote:
>
> The latest beta cycle for Tomcat 3.2.2 has completed with no new bugs
> identified. As the release manager I propose that we release the tomcat_32
> branch as Tomcat 3.2.2. Please indicat
David,
A detailed bug report w/ test case is *great*, but it would also be very,
very helpful if you could specify:
1) What version of Tomcat you are running (precisely)
2) What web server you are running, and its version
3) Your OS
-Dan
DAK wrote:
>
> I finally got out from under some work a
Hi,
I've got a terible headache... It happens all the time I try to touch the
bugs related with encodings - any of them...
I'm sure you already know ( but I just found out ) what
"surrogate" characters are. I know that UTF is _not_ 16 bits, but I had no
idea it is 21 bits ( as opposed to UCS - 3
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Jayson Falkner wrote:
> I assume it does. If so what is the correct way to use this functionality? I
> have been having little luck trying and can't find the answer documented.
>
> Here is a little insight on what I was attempting. The JAR has all of the
> class files in their
I assume it does. If so what is the correct way to use this functionality? I
have been having little luck trying and can't find the answer documented.
Here is a little insight on what I was attempting. The JAR has all of the
class files in their correct directories along with a TLD in the META-IN
I finally got out from under some work and was able to make some test
code. I'm attaching the client and servlet code.
The code transfers a couple parameters, then a binary file (I was using
a .jar). If you call the client with
"BinTestClient localhost something.jar b", it uses byte-by-byte rea
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 12:40:04PM -0700, Forrest R. Girouard wrote:
>
> It is my understanding that '8859_1' is an alias for a Java encoding
> which maps to the 'ISO-8859-1' character set. The Java encoding and
> the character set name are not always the same.
>
> Furthermore, while it's not
11 matches
Mail list logo
