RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development

2001-05-05 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
+1 I think that to have a jakarta-tomcat-sandbox makes sense too... Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 4 de mayo de 2001 19:18 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories f

Re: Problems building the Mod_jk.so

2001-05-05 Thread kevin seguin
if no one else has one available, i can build one on solaris 2.6, which is upward compatible with solaris 2.7. i just can do it right now. if needed, email me later to remind me... -kevin. Nancy Patricia Espinel Pérez wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > We're tring to build the mod_jk.so on solaris 7 but

Re: ajp12, ajp13, mod_webapp, and http protocols

2001-05-05 Thread cmanolache
Hi, On Sat, 5 May 2001, Xilei Wang wrote: > 1. I know ajp protocol was originally introduced by > by mod_jserv to communicate with JServ. But what I > was wondering is, why at that time, a new protocol, > ajpxx was introduced rather using the existing http > protocol. It is felt that a binary

Problems building the Mod_jk.so

2001-05-05 Thread Nancy Patricia Espinel Pérez
Hi Tim, We're tring to build the mod_jk.so on solaris 7 but, we have the following error: cc -DEAPI -DMOD_PERL -DUSE_EXPAT -O -G -Kpic -I/usr/apache/include -I../jk -I/us r/java/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris -DSOLARIS -c mod_jk.c /usr/ucb/cc: language optional software package not insta

RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development

2001-05-05 Thread Marc Saegesser
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] New Repositories for Collaborative Development > > > Over the last few weeks, there has been a lot of discussion on > col

Re: ajp12, ajp13, mod_webapp, and http protocols

2001-05-05 Thread Xilei Wang
Thanks for your reply! I am not an expert either. ;-) Here is my simple thought after seeing your reply: 1. I know ajp protocol was originally introduced by by mod_jserv to communicate with JServ. But what I was wondering is, why at that time, a new protocol, ajpxx was introduced rather using

Re: ajp12, ajp13, mod_webapp, and http protocols

2001-05-05 Thread cmanolache
On Sat, 5 May 2001, kevin seguin wrote: > i believe the original reason why mod_jserv and ajp were introduced was > for connecting the apache web server to the old JServ servlet > container. when tomcat showed up, mod_jserv was used for it too. i > think mod_jk, which added support for more web

Re: Tomcat 3.2.2 beta 4 (insecure default settings)

2001-05-05 Thread Andrey Kartashov
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:58:17PM -0400, Andrey Kartashov wrote: [skpd] > > Let's be prudent here. The standard configuration must avoid > > security hole. Many users will have tomcat in front and we > > must avoid someone outside shutdown their TC boxes. > > Let me clarify this:) I don't ask

Re: ajp12, ajp13, mod_webapp, and http protocols

2001-05-05 Thread Wolle
Hello, in the documentation of the ajp13 Protocol is something written, that ajp13 provides the isSecure Methode on Servlets for SSL, but I have tested it with ajp12, and the isSecure Methode works,too. Greetings, Wolle kevin seguin wrote: > i'm not the expert on these things, but i'll try to a

Re: ajp12, ajp13, mod_webapp, and http protocols

2001-05-05 Thread kevin seguin
i'm not the expert on these things, but i'll try to answer your questions as best i can. i'm sure if i say something that is blatantly wrong, i will be corrected ;) the information here is pretty much what i've figured out for myself using tomcat over the last year or so... > > I am using mod_

Re: [PROPOSAL Tomcat 4.x] Cluster

2001-05-05 Thread Kief Morris
Bip, thanks for kick-starting this discussion, sorry I've taken a while to look at it. >> One thing I haven't figured out is this. Say I replicate a >> Session to another machine and succefully install it in the manger, if >> I connect to that machine and tries to resume that session it doesn't