> If you like that patch, you'll probably also like
> the ones I sent in on Friday -- messages with the
> title
> "[PATCH] TC4: TomcatBlock on Avalon 3.1a1"..
I'm -1 on applying the Avalon patch in the 4.0 tree.
The rationale is :
- Avalon isn't ready yet. It's still in alpha stage, and I fear th
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Someone who needs only jasper can take the utils and jasper package.
> ( duplicating some of the classes in 2 package may have negative impact on
> class loading - it may throw "Sealing" exceptions )
My apologize for my intervention
Thanks for the replies. I epxerimented with this by
1. keeping the timeout to 4 minutes
2. accessing the server 2-1/2 minutes after the start
3. Accessing it again after 2-1/2 more minutes,
but my session expired by then.
>>After a request is finished, lastAccessedTime should be
>>updated to =
I am using Flash to make a https request to a servlet. Flash seems to send
the request and it gets to the servlet, but it hangs when reading/getting
the response. It works fine when getting a text file containing the same
info over https. Therefore two questions:
1. This is how I create the re
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >
> > While playing with Sam Ruby's gump I noticed that
the
> > CatalinaBlock is out of sync with Avalon. Not sure
if
> > staying right up-to-date is critical but here's
the
> > patch anyway.
>
>
> Until Avalon ships, tracking to the current APIs i
rubys 01/02/10 20:14:28
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaBlock.java
Log:
Keep up with the latest Avalon changes
Submitted by: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -5
jakarta-t
rubys 01/02/10 20:13:04
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaBlock.java
Log:
Keep up with the latest Avalon changes
Submitted by: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
costin 01/02/11 20:07:01
Modified:src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JasperMangler.java
Log:
Resolved the (common) "//" problem ( URIs with double slashes ).
( a more generic fix later, this solves a problem with some existing webapps)
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
[X] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and my
reason is:
Larry Isaacs
costin 01/02/11 19:26:38
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup Tomcat.java
Log:
Added the "sandbox" option - otherwise it's hard to start tomcat
with security manager if java -jar is used to start.
After M1 I'll propose the change of the scripts, there are quite a few
costin 01/02/11 19:25:05
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util StringManager.java
Log:
Bug fix - if the localized bundle is not found, use US.
( I just installed a RO-localized linux, and tomcat didn't start )
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +13 -5
jakarta-tom
Marc Saegesser wrote:
>
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and my
>
NOTE: I sent the following question to jsp-spec-comments but I'm going to
post it here as well to get some additional discussion.
This question came up from my review of open Bugzilla reports against Tocmat
3.2.1 in preparation for the 3.2.2 release. The bug report can be found at
http://nagoy
Jon,
No, it's not in the release plan. Henri had proposed it at the end of last
week (in an email, not in a plan). We need to discuss it on the list, but,
unless someone convinces me otherwise, I don't support it -- there has been
work done on the native portions of 3.3 which is not just bug fi
I keep getting these in my inbox. Anyone else getting these?
- r
> -Original Message-
> From:
> Sent: None
> Subject:
>
>
> by femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail
> vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com> for <
> [X] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and my
> reason is:
-Dan
--
Dan Milstein // [EMAIL PROTECT
> <- Please return this portion with your vote ->
>
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1 I am against thi
Marc Saegesser wrote:
> [...]
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and
>
> > This adds another dependency between jasper and tomcat.util ( the first is
> > tomcat.util.log, now tomcat.util.compat ). Since both packages are completely
> > standalone and can be bundled with jasper, I don't think it'll be a problem.
>
> Comments:
>
> I don't personally see a problem
> Maybe a good idea would be to change the build scripts to package the
> jasper.jar file with *everything* it needs to run
> standalone...even if it
> means duplicating a couple .class files.
>
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
on 2/11/01 11:27 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This adds another dependency between jasper and tomcat.util ( the first is
> tomcat.util.log, now tomcat.util.compat ). Since both packages are completely
> standalone and can be bundled with jasper, I don't think it'll be a pr
on 2/11/01 7:21 AM, "Marc Saegesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my
> reason is:
-jon
-
on 2/11/01 7:54 AM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could help port of latest native mod_jk stuff from TC 3.3,
> if everybody agrees. So we could have both apache 1.3 and 2.0
> connectors, and be at the same level between TC 3.2.2/3.3
Is that in the release plan?
-jon
--
If you c
costin 01/02/11 11:27:32
Modified:src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime JspWriterImpl.java
Log:
Fix the System.getProperty("line.separator") problem in JspWriter.
( it was causing most of the failures in the nightly tests for sandboxed
tomcat ).
This adds another dependency
> <- Please return this portion with your vote ->
>
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [ ] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1 I am against this plan bei
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my
> reason is:
I'll
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help
[ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and my
reason is:
+1
I could help port of latest native mod_jk stu
> Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan Ballot:
>
> [X] +1 I am in favor of this plan and will help
> [ ] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
> [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan
> [ ] -1 I am against this plan being executed, and my
> reason is:
>
>
This is the vote for the Tomcat 3.2.2 Release Plan. This vote is to accept
the release plan document as it is currently written. It is not the vote to
release Tomcat 3.2.2.
The release plan can be found at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-tomcat/Attic/R
ELEASE-PLA
Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 12:52 PM 2/10/2001 -0800
>This was discussed by the expert group for servlet 2.3, and Kief's
>understanding is what we came up with. In addition, that is what Section 7.6
>says in 2.3 PFD (emphasis is added):
>
>The getLastAccessedTime method of the
30 matches
Mail list logo
