Don't forget read/delivery receipts have a null ("<>") mail from.
Tonino
Satish Alwani ha scritto:
Hi,
I have a scenario where i have a submission port/ip, where users can
relay through and doesnt do any RBL checks as such. However, what i
have noticed is that if the user authenticates, he c
Hi,
I have a scenario where i have a submission port/ip, where users can
relay through and doesnt do any RBL checks as such. However, what i have
noticed is that if the user authenticates, he can then send a message
with any from address.
Is there a way to limit them such that at the very le
So, can you tell me what further steps need to be taken to impliment domain
keys if I installed the toaster per the instructions yesterday?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Bill Shupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:36 AM, Dennis Erickson wrote:
>
> I found this is one of the ar
SYMPTOMS/ISSUE:
1. Occassionaly cannot send mail through mail client over smtp to the
server. If you wait 10-15 minutes it will typically work again.
2. NEVER an issue if sending from within a browser.
3. After reboot server wont allow email clients to send email. After 20
minutes or so it
if its taking time to load up. something tells me its your spamd/clamd
check your logs when you restart next time. /var/log/qmail/current (as
per LWQ installation)
if you see any of those permerrors and such, then theres a good chance
its clamd. The old versions USED to take a while to start up
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:39:41 -0600, John Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I saw other threads on the LAN trace reject message, and tried what they
> had to say, but they made no difference. Overall, the system looks
> healthy, and I can't tell why it does this. I thought I might have been
> ru
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:39:41 -0600, John Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I saw other threads on the LAN trace reject message, and tried what they
had to say, but they made no difference. Overall, the system looks
healthy, and I can't tell why it does this.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:40:31 -0600, John Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I will test that out along with the other
> gentleman's suggestion on clam (for the reboot issue); however, I don't
> know how to disable simscan (doesn't appear to be a normal /etc/init.d
> service
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:40:31 -0600, John Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I will test that out along with the other
gentleman's suggestion on clam (for the reboot issue); however, I don't
know how to disable simscan (doesn't appear to
