Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread Claas Langbehn
> Will you we considering including FuzzyOcr [1] to combat graphics spam in your toaster? > Have you used it? I am using dspam (dspam.nuclearelephant.com) and this type of spam is nearly always in my SPAM folder. And that, even though it does not look at the embedded graphics. :) claas

Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread eero
On la 24.3.2007 11:16, Claas Langbehn wrote: >> Will you we considering including FuzzyOcr [1] to combat graphics >> > spam in your toaster? >> Have you used it? >> > > I am using dspam (dspam.nuclearelephant.com) and this type of spam is > nearly always in my SPAM folder. And that, even though it

Re: [toaster] fuzzyocr

2007-03-24 Thread Claas Langbehn
DSPAM is intresting, but really lack of documentation is pain in the ass. And it's very effective. There is a README, there is a Wiki on the website and I also wrote a short toaster for it: http://www.rootdir.de/qmail/ Claas

[toaster] Unsubscription request

2007-03-24 Thread David
unsubscribe

Re: [toaster] updated toaster patch

2007-03-24 Thread Bill Shupp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, after i figured out why simscan didn't run ripmime (as usual > permissions) i tested domainkayes and it doesn't work. > > Now the real question is, i did it properly ? > > I followed the libdomainkeys website instructions but the messages do not > get signed. > >

Re: [toaster] updated toaster patch

2007-03-24 Thread Bill Shupp
Bill Shupp wrote: > I'll test signing later when I have some time to set it up. Signing works just fine as well: DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=merchbox.com; b=qx+1bc1baPy6zBt2CYUIXMpTpoN3307dqQIzJ/8F++3h5hf+xpj92dGGqchxq79S6w733qBSTRN1qv0OGNMtphJ3XGmmy3tKxiUNLc