[toaster] [mail-toaster] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). Short table of changes (more detailed changes in http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/changelog.html) * corrected some bugs on MySQL checking (problem was only with so

Re: [toaster] [mail-toaster] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > > Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). > > Short table of changes (more detailed changes in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/changelog.html) > > * corrected some bugs on

Re: [toaster] [mail-toaster] chkuser version 2.0.9 released

At 17.07 21/03/2007, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > > Version 2.0.9 of chkuser has been released (see > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/). > > Short table of changes (more detailed changes in > http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/download/changelog.html) >

[toaster] spam throttle

Is anyone using feature successfully? If so, how have you dealt with the lack of garbage collection? (The directories/files it creates can fill up all available inodes on a system). I'm asking because I'm considering removing it from the toaster patch, I don't use it anymore. Regards, Bill

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

Bill: i'm using it, and have a cron that deletes the directory every night: 0 4 * * * rm -rf /var/qmail/spam/* regards, *Ingo Claro F.* Gerente de Operaciones NetRed S.A. Certificado ISO 9001:2000 Bill Shupp escri

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

Ingo Claro wrote: > Bill: > i'm using it, and have a cron that deletes the directory every night: > 0 4 * * * rm -rf /var/qmail/spam/* Well, that'll certainly work. What settings are you using, and have you found it to help reduce mail abuse? Thanks, Bill

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

Bill Shupp wrote: Is anyone using feature successfully? If so, how have you dealt with the lack of garbage collection? (The directories/files it creates can fill up all available inodes on a system). I'm asking because I'm considering removing it from the toaster patch, I don't use it anymore.

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

# by default, turn throttling on :/32:1000::1:8::: # netred 192.168.1.0/24:ok:0:0:0 . and I repeat the last line for my servers also. It helps slow down spammers. regards, *Ingo Claro F.* Gerente de Operaciones NetRed S.A.

[toaster] Receiving SPAM via secondary MXes

Hello guys 'n' girls, I am receiving a lot of spam from my secondary MXes. I can even say that 99.9% of the mails I receive from my MXes is SPAM. As long as I am deleting mails to not existing users, it's okay. But when I am bouncing the mails, I am probably getting bounces back again. Which

Re: [toaster] Receiving SPAM via secondary MXes

Claas Langbehn wrote: > Hello guys 'n' girls, > > I am receiving a lot of spam from my secondary MXes. I can even say that > 99.9% of the mails I receive from my MXes is SPAM. As long as I am > deleting mails to not existing users, it's okay. But when I am bouncing > the mails, I am probably getti

Re: [toaster] Receiving SPAM via secondary MXes

Bill Shupp wrote: Tighten security on the backup MX machines. Use more RBLs, and try greylisting. That's what I do. Unfortunately, I have no control over the backup MX servers. I thought maybe there would be a way to treat mails from MX servers different. e.g. Don't bounce mails if deliver

Re: [toaster] spam throttle

What do you use in place of spam-throttle? On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 10:35 -0700, Bill Shupp wrote: > Is anyone using feature successfully? If so, how have you dealt with > the lack of garbage collection? (The directories/files it creates can > fill up all available inodes on a system). I'm asking