Re: [toaster] Latest installer for Bill Shup Toaster

2007-03-10 Thread Ahmet YAZICI
SKT/MIS/ROZI wrote: Currently i have simscan 1.3.1 which i get from rpm at qmailtoaster site. Can i applied this patch? Currently i have problem with qmailtoaster from qmailtoaster.com (Double email) I just want to reformat again and try your install. I'm using Centos here. I also heard about

Re: [toaster] CRLF - LF - Exchange

2007-03-10 Thread Maciej Sołtysiak
Bill wrote: I don't like the idea of patching qmail to compensate for broken MTAs. For those folks that need it, either use fixcrio, or apply the patch yourself (which is trivial to do so). So I will not commit it to my toaster patch. Bill, Isn't that against the "be liberal in what you accept;

[toaster] Spam Service / Solution (slightly off topic)

2007-03-10 Thread Maxwell
Hi, I thought I'd query the list about anti-spam services. Does anybody have any recommendations? The spam assassin, rules du jour, etc just isn't cutting it. I've seen services like ems.netriplex.com , mxlogic.com , appriver , but have always had mixed results. Does anyone have any good advic

Re: [toaster] Spam Service / Solution (slightly off topic)

2007-03-10 Thread Claas Langbehn
Check out http://dspam.nuclearelephant.com :)

Re: [toaster] CRLF - LF - Exchange

2007-03-10 Thread Bill Shupp
Maciej Sołtysiak wrote: > Bill, Isn't that against the "be liberal in what you accept; be > conservative in what you send" > thing ? It's all about interoperability, not eye-poking in broken MTAs' > users. > Good software/setup should be resilient against any input. I feel that the days of "be li

[toaster] QmailAdmin and Qmail behind proxy

2007-03-10 Thread SKT/MIS/ROZI
hi all, I have a big problem here. Can i install the qmailadmin on different server? Letsay my email server is at 192.168.0.11 ip and my qmailadmin is on 192.168.0.12 ip? Is it have a way to let them communicate? Regards Rozi