Re: [toaster] clamav-0.88.1

On 05/04/2006 Bob Hutchinson wrote: One of the toaster patches failed: (0.87) I'm running the toaster with clamav from Debian volatile (0.88) with no patches and everything seems fine - can someone tell me what the patches do? I dont run with custom error messages setup on qmail either as I

Re: [toaster] Submitting spam to Bayesian filter from SquirrelMail

Bob Hutchinson wrote: > On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > > Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > > The squirrelmail spam-button plugin works for me. > > > > .. > > > > > This will allow your customers to train spamassassin. > > > > > > Wether they will or not is another matter ;-(

Re: [toaster] LogWatch and MultiLog

Bob Hutchinson wrote: > On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > > People with CentOS and RedHat get LogWatch installed by default. > > Unfortunately, out of the box LogWatch does not grok MultiLog files at all. > > More recent versions of Logwatch do support qmail running with Mul

Re: [toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder

Bob Hutchinson wrote: > On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > > I would like to sort my spam tagged email into a separate spam folder > > automatically. I've seen lots of different ways to do that, or varying > > complexity, on the 'Net. > > > > Is there an easy way, that works

Re: [toaster] LogWatch and MultiLog

On Thursday 06 Apr 2006 13:00, Nikki Locke wrote: > Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > > > People with CentOS and RedHat get LogWatch installed by default. > > > Unfortunately, out of the box LogWatch does not grok MultiLog files at > > > all. > > > > Mor

Re: [toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder

On Thursday 06 Apr 2006 13:00, Nikki Locke wrote: > Bob Hutchinson wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 Apr 2006 19:55, Nikki Locke wrote: > > > I would like to sort my spam tagged email into a separate spam folder > > > automatically. I've seen lots of different ways to do that, or varying > > > complexity,

Re: [toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder

Thanks, Bob. I'm still ever so slightly confused, as I seem to have both /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake AND /usr/lib/courier-imap/bin/maildirmake, and I'm not sure which one I'm supposed to use. It occurred to me to ask myself what version of courier-imap I had, so my fingers (which sometimes hav

[toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

Hello all: when I activate spamassassin for a domain the mails get corrupted, I only get this: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 3833 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2006 04:09:06 - Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 3826, pid: 3830, t: 0.0193s

Re: [toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

Ingo Claro wrote: > Hello all: > > when I activate spamassassin for a domain the mails get corrupted, I > only get this: > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 3833 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2006 04:09:06 - > Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid:

Re: [toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill Shupp wrote: > Ingo Claro wrote: >> Hello all: >> >> when I activate spamassassin for a domain the mails get corrupted, I >> only get this: >> >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Received: (qmail 3833 invoked

Re: [toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

Got this: @40004436092c0e078b8c CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:> remote <[192.168.1.105]:unknown:192.168.1.105> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : found existing recipient @40004436092c0f04c7ac simscan: cdb looking up @40004436092c0f50e024 simscan: cdb fo

Re: [toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

ok, I'll check, I'm using pure simscan, no maildrop. atte, *Ingo Claro F.* Gerente de Operaciones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+56-2) 43 00 155 Kiril Todorov escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill Shupp wrote: Ingo Clar

Re: [toaster] Sorting spam mail into a separate folder

On Thursday 06 Apr 2006 16:30, Nikki Locke wrote: > Thanks, Bob. > > I'm still ever so slightly confused, as I seem to have both > /var/qmail/bin/maildirmake AND /usr/lib/courier-imap/bin/maildirmake, and > I'm not sure which one I'm supposed to use. > > It occurred to me to ask myself what versio

Re: [toaster] problems with spamassassin 3.1.1

Found the problem!! > @40004436092c206c3584 simscan: calling /usr/local/bin/spamc spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] the spamc binary is in: /usr/bin/spamc regards, *Ingo Claro F.* Gerente de Operaciones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+56-2) 43 00 155