Re: [toaster] Greylisting for toaster-0.8.2

2005-12-02 Thread Th. Salditt
Hi Bill, can you give me a small installation paper for the greylisting patch ? Is there something to change in the patch something like FILE? Thanks a lot. Thomas

Re: [toaster] Greylisting for toaster-0.8.2

2005-12-02 Thread Mick
> The current greylisting patch applies successfully over the 0.8 toaster > patch. > > Regards, > > Bill > Thanks a lot. I will try it. Regards, Mick

Re: [toaster] Greylisting for toaster-0.8.2

2005-12-02 Thread Bill Shupp
Th. Salditt wrote: Hi Bill, can you give me a small installation paper for the greylisting patch ? Is there something to change in the patch something like FILE? Read http://shupp.org for info on the patch. It covers which patches are available, and how to setup the mysql schema. If you ne

[toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks

2005-12-02 Thread Marcus Williams
Hi - Using the current toaster I'd like to bounce messages heading for unknown users _after_ a spam/virus check. That way I can set up the system not to bounce virus or spam messages just bin them. Currently chkusr is returning no such user errors and bouncing straight away. I realise this wi

Re: [toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks

2005-12-02 Thread Shane
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:52 +, Marcus Williams wrote: > Hi - > > Using the current toaster I'd like to bounce messages heading for > unknown users _after_ a spam/virus check. That way I can set up the > system not to bounce virus or spam messages just bin them. Currently > chkusr is returni

Re: [toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks

2005-12-02 Thread Marcus Williams
On 02/12/2005 Shane wrote: Why would you want to accept the message and them process it? Keep using chkuser to reject at the smtp level for "no such users" and setup simscan to query spamassassin / clamav and also reject virus/spam at the smtp level as well. This way the responsibility is back

Re: [toaster] Bounce after virus/spam checks

2005-12-02 Thread Shane
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 17:04 +, Marcus Williams wrote: > On 02/12/2005 Shane wrote: > > Why would you want to accept the message and them process it? Keep > > using > > chkuser to reject at the smtp level for "no such users" and setup > > simscan to query spamassassin / clamav and also reject v