Hello,
I followed a life with qmail install but then found this qmail toaster
site and decided it would be easier to follow than to continue
installing vpopmail and everything else with no guide. I had the life
with qmail install working but tried to remove every file that was
associated with it.
That sounds interesting
Would you mind sharing you code changes to the rest of us please?
Kim
> Hi,
>
> I've installed Bill's toaster to Dual opteron, GENTOO linux, 64bit
> environment.
>
> Everything without problem (jut needed to change 2 lines of his code ;-)
>
> Roman
>
> Carlos J. Muentes n
hello again,
the last issue i posted i got past. I had to restart my server. I think
some service wasn't runing or it had something to do with the inittab.
Anyways following the toaster page i got to the courier imap part.
First i didnt have gmake but i just created a link to make.
Here's the re
Ill make a bet that you are having the same problem that im having.
There is something about having 2 different libraries because not
everything for the 64 bit linux's are compiled for 32 bit and 64 bit
processors. So you have 2 different libraries and it causes problems
sometimes. I am not very go
Hi @all we run qmail from shupp.org
Everythink works fine accept for one minor problem.
If an
E-Mail is send to an user it directly apears in the Maildir
folder.
This
works fine and very fast, BUT if we now try to receive this
E-Mail
it
takes 5 min. Although telnet to localhost on port 11
Sven Jansen wrote:
Hi @all we run qmail from shupp.org
Everythink works fine accept for one minor problem.
If an E-Mail is send to an user it directly apears in the Maildir folder.
This works fine and very fast, BUT if we now try to receive this E-Mail
it takes 5 min. Although telnet to localh
thx a lot.
Yesterday, I setup ntpdate on mailserver, but forgot configure ntpdate on
our NFS-Server
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Sven Jansen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2005 15:08
An: toaster@shupp.org
Betreff: Re: