Abel Lucano wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Bill Shupp wrote:
Yeah, this is a an odd problem with qmail-smtpd is not aware of the
available ciphers in openssl. I have yet to figure out what causes
this.. however, the fix is easy. Setup a static cipher list:
openssl ciphers > /var/qmail/control/tlsse
http://shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.3b1.patch.bz2
- - Lastly, I have updated the greylisting patch to add the relayclient
check before running qmail-envelope-scanner. The update patch is
located here:
http://shupp.org/patches/greylisting-20050423.patch
If you have time, please help test, and r
Hello Bill,
Saturday, April 23, 2005, 9:46:03 PM, you wrote:
> I have upgraded a few items:
Great!
> - - The toaster is now 0.7.10 due to vpopmail and ripmime updates.
I was wondering. Do you have previous versions of the toaster
so I could diff around it and see exactly what changed ?
> http:/
Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
- - The toaster is now 0.7.10 due to vpopmail and ripmime updates.
I was wondering. Do you have previous versions of the toaster
so I could diff around it and see exactly what changed ?
No, I don't. But you can just check out the ChangeLog, that's what it's
for.
http://sh
Bill Shupp wrote:
Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
Do people really use greylisting?
Some people do. I only use it for backup mx systems, as the reports of
problems in primary mx systems has been too high for what my customers
will put up with.
Hi,
Bill was my patch for the greylisting problem where sm
Bill Shupp wrote:
Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
Do people really use greylisting?
Some people do. I only use it for backup mx systems, as the reports of
problems in primary mx systems has been too high for what my customers
will put up with.
Hi,
Never Mind, I see I did send it.
As to Maciej question
Hello Bill,
Saturday, April 23, 2005, 11:57:24 PM, you wrote:
> Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
>> I was wondering. Do you have previous versions of the toaster
>> so I could diff around it and see exactly what changed ?
> No, I don't. But you can just check out the ChangeLog, that's what it's
> for.
W
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Bill was my patch for the greylisting problem where smtp-auth is used
included ? (I'm not even sure I submitted to the list now). Basically
it would not allow clients who had used smtp auth to send mail to send
mail, giving a 421 try-again later error (as is normal wi
Bill Shupp wrote:
I did add the relayclient definition,
but did NOT move the call to envelope_scanner below the chkuser code, as
Sorry, the above should read "I did add the relayclient *check*", not "I
did add the relayclient *definition*". Duh. Perhaps it's time for one
of the a Lion Red's
Rick Macdougall wrote:
As to Maciej question, yes quite a few people use the greylist patch. We
do with about 200 domains, and my personal spam has dropped from 200 a
day to 4 or 5 a week.
There are problems with
1 - Old NT exchange servers (some banks still use them), you need to
white list th
10 matches
Mail list logo
