On Mar 28, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
Has anyone tried ezmlm-idx-0.435? Specifically, does it work with
qmailadmin nicely?
I didn't know it had been released. I can try to take a look at it (at
least do a diff from the 0.42? version to see what's different).
I'm investigating this aft
Tom Collins wrote:
I thought it was intentional that ezmlm stripped out the received
headers leading up to the receipt of the message. I guess that it could
make it difficult to track down spam that way...
Well, they are not stripped completely as far as I can tell - only the
hostname or IP sec
Hi Bill,
I think the following code should be changed, otherwise smtp auth and
pop-before-smtp clients will not be able to send email when using the
greylisting patch.
New code (works)
if (flagbarfspf) { err_spf(); return; }
switch (chkuser_realrcpt (&mailfrom, &addr)) {
case CHKUSER
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi Bill,
I think the following code should be changed, otherwise smtp auth and
pop-before-smtp clients will not be able to send email when using the
greylisting patch.
Looks ok to me. I'll get that applied this week..
Thanks,
Bill
