Eero Volotinen wrote:
There is some _benefits_, but I still recommed more cpu/memory power
instead of it...
Can you elaborate on this? I've found simscan to be significantly
faster and easier to manage than qmail-scanner. The load on my machines
have reached an all time low due to simscan...
Well, last night we switched one of our larger mailservers from
qmail-scanner/fsavd to simscan/clamd and the improvement was dramatic. CPU
usage fell from an average of 60% to less than 10% and the load average
dropped from 3.00 to 4.00 down to .80 to 1.40. We would always have 4 or 5
Perl proc
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
I'm not running SMTP auth. All my SMTP is controlled specifically via
tcp.smtp or relay-ctrl managed ip addresses. The strange thing is
that these messages do not seem to deliver...just sit in my queue and
build up over time.
They will eventuall
