On Feb 20, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Bill Shupp wrote:
Interesting, thanks for the info. I might have had the same problem.
I need to upgrade courier-imap soon, and I'll try getting FAM support
working this time.
Well, enabling portmap wasn't enough apparently. Courier stopped
accepting connections a
It's been almost a year since I installed my last toaster and I see that
Bill is now using simscan and clamav instead of qmail-scanner. What do you
all think about simscan? - have you seen a substantial reduction in server
load and cpu load?
I would love some opinions - we have four mailservers
Question.
I have been running a toaster setup for some time. I -love- it. Cheers
and Kudos to all who have created such great software.
I do however have a question about messages that seem to be bogging my
mail queue.
I have -strict- relay controls in place...and only allow mail relaying
fro
Chris Moody wrote:
Question.
I have been running a toaster setup for some time. I -love- it.
Cheers and Kudos to all who have created such great software.
I do however have a question about messages that seem to be bogging my
mail queue.
I have -strict- relay controls in place...and only allow
On Feb 21, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
I have a pretty low-throughput system, but it shows 2332 messages
sitting in the queue. They are all to bogus addressesfrom bogus
addressesand go nowhere.
If they are for bogus local addresses, running the chkuser patch (as
you mentioned i
On Feb 21, 2005, at 8:25 PM, Jeff Koch wrote:
It's been almost a year since I installed my last toaster and I see
that Bill is now using simscan and clamav instead of qmail-scanner.
What do you all think about simscan? - have you seen a substantial
reduction in server load and cpu load?
I would
Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 21, 2005, at 9:03 PM, Chris Moody wrote:
I have a pretty low-throughput system, but it shows 2332 messages
sitting in the queue. They are all to bogus addressesfrom bogus
addressesand go nowhere.
If they are for bogus local addresses, running the chkuser patch
Jeff Koch wrote:
It's been almost a year since I installed my last toaster and I see that
Bill is now using simscan and clamav instead of qmail-scanner. What do
you all think about simscan? - have you seen a substantial reduction in
server load and cpu load?
I would love some opinions - we have
In some guides, there are some cpu optimizations to qmail:
like: (vi conf-cc) and change line cc -O2 to read like
-O2 -march=i686 -funroll-loops
This might give some speedup?
--
Eero
