[toaster] netqmail-1.05-solt1.patch

Hello, This is a readme.txt file about a patch I created that I apply on top netqmail-1.05 + qmail-toaster-0.7 for qmail servers set up according to the shupp's toaster. Shupp's toaster users may apply the following patch. Should apply cleanly. Version 1 CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2) DESCRIPTION

Re: [toaster] patch problem (Solved)

List wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: List wrote: There's an unnecessary line break... around like 15.. I'll get the patch fixed tomorrow, and post to the list when it's fixed. I have updated the patch.. please try this one: http://shupp.org/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2 Hi Bill, It it works fla

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster. I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux due to the way linux handles fsyncs. I did some searching and found that if I in

Re: [toaster] patch problem

Tom Collins wrote: On Jan 24, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Bill Shupp wrote: Tom Collins: I think this is a result of using the qmail-maildir++.patch from the vpopmail contrib directory.. it has the line break as well. You might want to update that in cvs. Are you sure it wasn't a problem in the downloa

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Bill Shupp wrote: Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster. I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux due to the way linux handles fsyncs. I did some searching and

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

On 1/25/2005 3:31 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Bill Shupp wrote: Adam Woodbeck wrote: I've been running Matt Simerson's FreeBSD qmail toaster for several years now and I'm getting ready to build a linux toaster.  I've been warned of queue problems when running qmail under linux

Re[2]: [toaster] Syncdir

Hello Adam, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 12:52:27 AM, you wrote: > Here is the description of the issue I found: > "Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is > unreliable under Linux because it assumes that link() is a > synchronous operation. This is not the case with EXT2 and Rei

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

Adam Woodbeck wrote: Here is the description of the issue I found: "Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux because it assumes that link() is a synchronous operation. This is not the case with EXT2 and ReiserFS. So you have to apply this patch

Re: [toaster] Syncdir

On 1/25/2005 7:16 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hello Adam, Wednesday, January 26, 2005, 12:52:27 AM, you wrote: Here is the description of the issue I found: "Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux because it assumes tha