I just set up a new toaster for my work mail server, and I'm having a
problem I've never encountered before. ALL local delivery is failing.
Here's the log messages:
@40004193a0f03b14234c starting delivery 91: msg 1807312 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40004193a0f03b144a5c status: local 1/10
Ahem. I should google a little more before posting. Excuse the panic, I
found the problem. I'd accidentally deleted the .qmail-default. Replaced
it, and everything is working fine.
--
Matthew Walker
Kydance Hosting & Consulting
http://www.kydance.net
Relating to the new toaster I set up, I've noticed some odd behavior with
the banner when you connect to SMTP. Also, commands seem to be somewhat
limited on remote connections. For example...
Local Test:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] squirrelmail]# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localh
Matthew Walker wrote:
Relating to the new toaster I set up, I've noticed some odd behavior with
the banner when you connect to SMTP. Also, commands seem to be somewhat
limited on remote connections. For example...
Local Test:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] squirrelmail]# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Ahmet YAZICI said:
> Matthew Walker wrote:
>
>>Relating to the new toaster I set up, I've noticed some odd behavior with
>>the banner when you connect to SMTP. Also, commands seem to be somewhat
>>limited on remote connections. For example...
>>
>>Local Test:
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] squirrelmail]#
Your isp may be redirecting port 25 bound traffic to it's own servers. Most
of the larger ones do this. When I setup a toaster for my last employer,
everything worked great inside the office network but when people brought
their laptops home a good 75% of them could not send emails. I figured ou
trevor said:
> Your isp may be redirecting port 25 bound traffic to it's own servers.
> Most
> of the larger ones do this. When I setup a toaster for my last employer,
> everything worked great inside the office network but when people brought
> their laptops home a good 75% of them could not sen
On Nov 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
Now... Remote Test:
arsenic ~ # telnet mail.thebraingarden.com 25
Trying 209.90.91.5...
Connected to user-5.pl107658.fiber.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 *
Can you watch the network with a packet sniffer like Etherea
Tom Collins said:
> On Nov 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> Now... Remote Test:
>>
>> arsenic ~ # telnet mail.thebraingarden.com 25
>> Trying 209.90.91.5...
>> Connected to user-5.pl107658.fiber.net.
>> Escape character is '^]'.
>> 220 *
>
> Can you watch
On Thursday 11 November 2004 16:39, Matthew Walker wrote:
> Tom Collins said:
> > On Nov 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
> >> Now... Remote Test:
> >>
> >> arsenic ~ # telnet mail.thebraingarden.com 25
> >> Trying 209.90.91.5...
> >> Connected to user-5.pl107658.fiber.net.
> >> Escape c
Dave Weiner said:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 16:39, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> Tom Collins said:
>> > On Nov 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>> >> Now... Remote Test:
>> >>
>> >> arsenic ~ # telnet mail.thebraingarden.com 25
>> >> Trying 209.90.91.5...
>> >> Connected to user-5.pl107
On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:23, Matthew Walker wrote:
> > Is there a Cisco PIX or a F5 Big IP on your network somewhere? The last
> > time
> > I saw a hello message like that it was either the PIX or the Big IP
> > proxying
> > the smtp connection. I think it was the Big IP
>
> After asking
Matthew Walker said:
>
> Dave Weiner said:
>> On Thursday 11 November 2004 16:39, Matthew Walker wrote:
>>> Tom Collins said:
>>> > On Nov 11, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>>> >> Now... Remote Test:
>>> >>
>>> >> arsenic ~ # telnet mail.thebraingarden.com 25
>>> >> Trying 209.90.91.5...
On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:28, Matthew Walker wrote:
> Thanks for all the help everyone! I just found the solution on google. For
> the archives, I just need to get this command issued on the PIX:
>
> no fixup protocol smtp 25
I told ya it was a simple config option! :)
Dave
14 matches
Mail list logo